Compare commits

...
Author SHA1 Message Date
JMR-devandClaude Opus 5 eded47d666 B1 (#173): tell the rail from the bottom bar, and the Convert tab from the Join tab
Two assertion gaps, not coverage gaps, which is why they lasted. AppRootRestorationTest
already drives AppRoot at Compact and Expanded, so JaCoCo is green on useRail -- but it
asserts only that the selected tab survives recreation, through a stub `content`
composable. Nothing anywhere queried for a rail or a bar, and nothing composed the real
screens. Measured before this file existed:

  - transposing the NavigationRail and NavigationBar bodies passed the entire suite
  - transposing Content's two arms passed it too

A tablet showing phone chrome, or the Convert tab opening the Join screen, and 546 tests
with nothing to say about either. AppRoot's own KDoc is why that matters more than it
looks: from targetSdk 37 the app is resized and rotated whether or not it is ready, so the
width class is not a preference.

WindowWidthSizeClass.Medium appears in no test in either source set today. useRail is
`!= Compact`, so Medium takes the rail; narrowing it to `== Expanded` is one character and
breaks every tablet and unfolded foldable. That mutation is red now, and it is red only
because of the Medium test -- the Compact and Expanded ones both survive it.

Two things this needed:

**createAndroidComposeRule rather than createComposeRule.** Rendering AppRoot with its
default content reaches ConverterScreen's `viewModel = viewModel()`, which needs a
ViewModelStoreOwner. It works because both ViewModels are
`@JvmOverloads constructor(app: Application, ...)` so AndroidViewModelFactory can build
them, and because ui-test-manifest's debugImplementation entry already puts a
ComponentActivity in the merged manifest the unit tests build against -- which
app/build.gradle.kts says in terms. Checked with a throwaway spike before the ticket was
filed, rather than discovered here.

**Two tags, applied inside main.** The only production change: TestTags.Shell, set on the
rail and the bar. There is no other way to tell the two apart -- both render the same two
destinations with the same labels and the same selection state, so any assertion writable
without them is satisfied by either layout. In TestTags and applied by the shell rather
than handed down by the test, for the reason that file's KDoc gives: a tag the test
supplies proves only that the test set it. TagTableUniquenessTest covers the new group.

564 -> 568 JVM tests, 0 failures.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 21:54:50 -05:00
JMR-devandClaude Opus 5 b41341a1cb B3 (#175): pin the AAC arm every ordinary conversion takes
audioArgs has six arms. Five are named codecs with tests; AAC arrives through the `else`,
so nothing named it -- neither "aac" nor "192k" appeared anywhere in
FFmpegCommandBuilderTest. It is the audio MP4 and M4A get, which is to say the audio the
picker offers first and most conversions produce.

Both halves are asserted, and the bitrate is the half worth arguing for: an -b:a that
quietly changed would fail nothing, look wrong in no command line, and surface only as
files that sound different from the ones the app produced last month. Both mutations
confirmed red -- 192k -> 128k and aac -> libfdk_aac.

Asserted through MP4_H264 and M4A_AAC rather than one of them, so an AAC arm added above
the `else` later has to keep answering the same way for both.

**Deliberately not added here: an ENCODABLE_AUDIO-vs-audioArgs agreement test**, the
obvious companion to VideoCodecMimeAgreementTest. It would freeze the answer to F1, which
is open: ContainerCapabilities.kt:84 says "nothing here emits a Vorbis encoder" and
FFmpegCommandBuilder.kt:188 does. docs/coverage-read-findings.md says in terms that the
tempting fix there locks in the wrong answer and that the decision comes first. This is
the AAC arm only.

563 -> 564 JVM tests, 0 failures. No production code changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 21:50:31 -05:00
JMR-devandClaude Opus 5 0f842243b5 B2 (#174): read what the progress notification actually says
An assertion gap rather than a coverage one, which is the reason it survived. JaCoCo is
green on build()'s `if (indeterminate)` because ProgressNotificationTest drives it through
a real worker -- but that test reads the notification id and EXTRA_PROGRESS and nothing
else. Nothing had ever read the text. Swapping the two branches passed the whole suite;
so did replacing the caller's title with a constant. Both are red now.

What it costs to get wrong is small and permanent: a conversion four minutes in still
saying "Preparing", or one that has not started reporting yet claiming 0%. Neither is a
crash, and nothing else here would have found it.

Nothing in the suite had constructed ConversionNotifications directly, and the reason
turned out to be mechanical rather than an oversight: build() reaches
WorkManager.getInstance for the Cancel action's PendingIntent, so the notification cannot
be built without one. installTestWorkManager in setUp is the whole fixture, and the KDoc
records the coupling so the next person does not rediscover it.

areEnabled() in the same file is deliberately still untested. It has no caller anywhere in
app/src/main, so a test would assert that a function nobody calls returns what the platform
told it -- and would imply the app handles the disabled-notification case, which it does
not. That is F5 in docs/coverage-read-findings.md, and it asks for a decision rather than a
test.

561 -> 563 JVM tests, 0 failures. No production code changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 21:48:36 -05:00
JMR-devandClaude Opus 5 2fbc957119 A5 (#171): fire the muxer guard that repairs "MP4 for everything", which had never fired
Media3Muxers' KDoc names the defect this guards -- "the router claimed five containers
while the engine silently wrote MP4 for all of them" -- and the repair itself was
untested: Media3Engine$buildTransformer$3, the requireNotNull message lambda, was four
lines and four branches at 0%. Nothing had ever driven a plan whose container Media3
cannot mux, and factoryFor answers null for fourteen of them.

Weakening it does not crash. The wrong output is a playable file with the wrong
container, which is why a test rather than a bug report is what would catch it.

Same harness and the same two disciplines as Media3EngineEmptyCompositionTest, which is
the sibling this joins: assert the plan really is the one the test needs before driving
the engine, and rule out CancellationException so an unresumed continuation cannot read
as a pass. Three premises are asserted here rather than assumed -- that the plan is still
WebM by the time the engine sees it, that Media3 really has no muxer for WebM, and that
neither track was dropped, since the empty-composition refusal fires earlier and is a
different test's subject.

The assertion is on the exception type *and* its message, and the ticket predicted why:
replacing requireNotNull with `?: DefaultMuxer.Factory()` does not make the export
succeed, it lets it run on and fail some other way. Measured -- that mutation fails the
type assertion, so the guard is genuinely what this test is holding, and the message
assertion stands behind it.

560 -> 561 JVM tests, 0 failures. No production code changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 21:45:43 -05:00
JMR-devandClaude Opus 5 a645442acc A2 + A3 (#168, #169): the hardware fallback, the cancellation that must not take it, and the name a job may not have
runMedia3OrFallBack was eleven lines at 0% and isCancellation had never been called by any
JVM test -- ci=0, not merely a missed branch. The seam to reach it has existed the whole
time: ConversionDependencies.hardware, which no unit test had ever set. What kept the path
cold is that every worker test uses EnginePreference.FORCE_SOFTWARE, which never enters
the function, and the probe defaults to UNPARSEABLE, which PERMISSIVE.canDecode refuses --
so even AUTO would have routed straight to FFmpeg for a reason no assertion mentioned.
Both are now stated in setUp rather than inherited.

Four behaviours, each with the mutation that proves it:

  hardware failure falls back to software    delete the fallback call
  ... on a *clean* staging file              delete staged.delete() before it
  cancellation is rethrown, not fallen back  delete `if (isCancellation(e)) throw e`
  engine.close() runs either way             empty the finally block
  the display-name fallback (#169)           change "input" to anything else

All five confirmed red, then restored.

The cancellation one is the reason this ticket was first in the group. runMedia3OrFallBack
catches Throwable, so without that re-throw a user cancelling a hardware transcode has the
app quietly start a *second* conversion in software -- the one thing cancelling is for.
ForcedFailureTest covers the failure half on a device and does not cover this half at all.

The clean-staging assertion is made where it is observable rather than by reading the
file: the software fake records whether the output existed when it was entered, so a
missing delete shows up as FFmpeg finding a half-written hardware output at the path it is
about to write.

556 -> 560 JVM tests, 0 failures. No production code changed.
ConversionWorker: 22 -> 9 missed lines, 14 -> 7 missed branches.
Line 2090/2348 -> 2103/2348; branch 1022/1340 -> 1029/1340.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 21:42:27 -05:00
JMR-devandClaude Opus 5 5761faced6 A4 (#170): join the two halves of an unreadable join clip, and record why the catch arm stays device-only
The ticket asked for two things. One of them is not reachable from the JVM, and saying
so is most of the value here.

**probeForConcat's catch arm cannot be provoked on this runtime.** Robolectric's
MediaExtractor never throws from setDataSource -- measured across four input shapes: an
unregistered content:// authority, a missing file://, a file of garbage bytes, and an
http:// URL. All four returned normally with trackCount = 0. So a failed read arrives as
an empty track list rather than as an exception and reaches the same
ConcatInput(null, null, 0, 0, 0) by the other road. The catch stays covered only by
ConcatEngineTest on a device. The test file says this rather than implying the arm is
handled.

**What is reachable, and was genuinely missing, is the span.** Both halves were already
covered and neither reached the other: MediaProbeTrackWalkTest pins what concatInputFrom
makes of a track list, ConcatPlannerTest's `an unknown codec is not treated as a match`
pins what the planner does with a hand-built ConcatInput(video = null). The planner's
safety rests on the probe really producing that shape, and the hand-built fixture would
go on passing if it stopped.

Measured rather than claimed: mutating concatInputFrom's initial `video` to a non-null
placeholder leaves ConcatPlannerTest green and turns this red. Dropping the planner's
video null guard turns both red -- so that half was already held, and this file does not
claim credit for it.

The coupling itself is worth writing down: ConcatPlanner guards video against a null codec
and audio not at all, and that asymmetry is correct rather than an oversight --
MediaProbe.shortName returns a non-null String, so a null audioCodec means the track is
absent and two clips with no audio really do match, while a null videoCodec means absent
*or* unreadable. The audio check is safe because the video guard fires first on a clip
nothing could read. Nothing held that.

555 -> 556 JVM tests, 0 failures. No production code changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 21:37:45 -05:00
9 changed files with 656 additions and 2 deletions
@@ -24,9 +24,11 @@ import androidx.compose.runtime.saveable.Saver
import androidx.compose.runtime.saveable.rememberSaveable
import androidx.compose.runtime.setValue
import androidx.compose.ui.Modifier
import androidx.compose.ui.platform.testTag
import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConverterScreen
import org.libremediaconverter.join.JoinScreen
import org.libremediaconverter.ui.TestTags
import org.libremediaconverter.ui.theme.LibreMediaConverterTheme
/**
@@ -114,7 +116,7 @@ internal fun AppRoot(
if (useRail) {
Row(modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize()) {
NavigationRail {
NavigationRail(modifier = Modifier.testTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL)) {
Destination.entries.forEach { item ->
NavigationRailItem(
selected = destination == item,
@@ -132,7 +134,7 @@ internal fun AppRoot(
Scaffold(
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize(),
bottomBar = {
NavigationBar {
NavigationBar(modifier = Modifier.testTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR)) {
Destination.entries.forEach { item ->
NavigationBarItem(
selected = destination == item,
@@ -56,6 +56,20 @@ object TestTags {
*/
const val RETRY_SAVE: String = "action.retrySave"
/**
* The adaptive shell around both screens -- `AppRoot`'s two layouts.
*
* Named because there is no other way to tell them apart from a test. Both render the same two
* destinations with the same labels and the same selection state, so every assertion that could
* be written without these tags is satisfied by either layout, and transposing the two bodies
* passed the whole suite. Exactly one of the two exists at a time, which is what makes
* `assertExists` / `assertDoesNotExist` on this pair a statement about the width class.
*/
object Shell {
const val NAVIGATION_RAIL: String = "shell.navigationRail"
const val NAVIGATION_BAR: String = "shell.navigationBar"
}
/** `ConverterScreen`. */
object Converter {
const val CHOOSE_FILE: String = "converter.chooseFile"
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
package org.libremediaconverter
import androidx.activity.ComponentActivity
import androidx.compose.material3.windowsizeclass.WindowWidthSizeClass
import androidx.compose.ui.test.junit4.v2.createAndroidComposeRule
import androidx.compose.ui.test.onNodeWithTag
import androidx.compose.ui.test.onNodeWithText
import androidx.compose.ui.test.performClick
import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
import androidx.work.Data
import org.junit.After
import org.junit.Before
import org.junit.Rule
import org.junit.Test
import org.junit.runner.RunWith
import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConversionDependencies
import org.libremediaconverter.convert.installTestWorkManager
import org.libremediaconverter.model.InputProbe
import org.libremediaconverter.ui.TestTags
import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
/**
* Which navigation affordance the shell actually renders, and which screen it actually shows.
*
* Assertion gaps rather than coverage gaps, both of them, and that is why they lasted.
* `AppRootRestorationTest` already drives `AppRoot` at `Compact` and `Expanded`, so JaCoCo is green
* on `useRail` -- but it asserts only that the *selected tab* survives recreation, through a stub
* `content` composable. Nothing anywhere queried for a rail or a bar, and nothing rendered the real
* screens. Two consequences, both measured before this file existed:
*
* - **Transposing the `NavigationRail` and `NavigationBar` bodies passed the entire suite.**
* - **Transposing `Content`'s two arms passed it too** -- a tablet showing the phone chrome, or the
* Convert tab opening the Join screen, and 546 tests with nothing to say about either.
*
* `AppRoot`'s own KDoc is why this matters more than it looks: from targetSdk 37 the app is resized
* and rotated whether or not it is ready, so the width class is not a preference, it is whatever
* the system hands over.
*
* ## Two things this needed that the rest of the suite does not
*
* **`createAndroidComposeRule`, not `createComposeRule`.** Rendering `AppRoot` with its *default*
* content reaches `ConverterScreen`'s `viewModel = viewModel()`, which needs a
* `ViewModelStoreOwner`; the plain rule supplies none. It works because both ViewModels are
* `@JvmOverloads constructor(app: Application, …)`, so `AndroidViewModelFactory` can build them,
* and because `app/build.gradle.kts` already puts `ui-test-manifest`'s `ComponentActivity` in the
* merged manifest the unit tests build against -- which that file says in terms.
*
* **Tags on the two bars.** They are in `TestTags`, applied inside `main`, for the reason that
* file's KDoc gives: a tag the test hands down proves only that the test set it.
*/
@UnstableApi
@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
class AdaptiveShellTest {
@get:Rule
val composeRule = createAndroidComposeRule<ComponentActivity>()
@Before
fun setUp() {
val app = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
installTestWorkManager(app, Data.EMPTY)
// The real screens are composed here, so their ViewModels are real too. Neither test is
// about probing or publishing; left alone they would reach the FFprobe loader and this
// machine's codec list, and decide things no assertion mentions.
ConversionDependencies.probe = { _, _ -> InputProbe() }
}
@After
fun tearDown() {
ConversionDependencies.reset()
}
@Test
fun `a phone gets the bottom bar and a tablet gets the rail`() {
setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Compact)
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR).assertExists()
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL).assertDoesNotExist()
}
@Test
fun `an expanded window gets the rail`() {
setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Expanded)
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL).assertExists()
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR).assertDoesNotExist()
}
/**
* The width class no test had ever passed.
*
* `useRail` is `!= Compact`, so Medium takes the rail with Expanded. Narrowing it to
* `== Expanded` is a one-character change that breaks every tablet and unfolded foldable and
* nothing else -- and until this test, nothing in either source set used `Medium` at all.
*/
@Test
fun `a medium window is a rail window, not a phone`() {
setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Medium)
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL).assertExists()
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR).assertDoesNotExist()
}
/**
* The mapping every other test stubs out: which screen each destination actually opens.
*
* Matched on each screen's own "choose a file" affordance rather than on a title, because those
* tags are applied by the screens themselves -- so this fails if the destinations are
* transposed, and it fails for the right reason.
*/
@Test
fun `Convert opens the converter and Join opens the join screen`() {
setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Compact)
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Converter.CHOOSE_FILE).assertExists()
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Join.CHOOSE_FILES).assertDoesNotExist()
composeRule.onNodeWithText(Destination.JOIN.label).performClick()
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Join.CHOOSE_FILES).assertExists()
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Converter.CHOOSE_FILE).assertDoesNotExist()
}
/** [AppRoot] with its real content, which is the half nothing else composes. */
private fun setShell(width: WindowWidthSizeClass) {
composeRule.setContent { AppRoot(width) }
}
}
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
package org.libremediaconverter.convert
import android.net.Uri
import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
import kotlinx.coroutines.runBlocking
import kotlinx.coroutines.withTimeout
import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
import org.junit.Assert.assertFalse
import org.junit.Assert.assertNotEquals
import org.junit.Assert.assertNull
import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
import org.junit.Test
import org.junit.runner.RunWith
import org.libremediaconverter.model.AudioCodec
import org.libremediaconverter.model.AudioPlan
import org.libremediaconverter.model.Container
import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConversionRequest
import org.libremediaconverter.model.CopyPlanner
import org.libremediaconverter.model.InputProbe
import org.libremediaconverter.model.OutputSpec
import org.libremediaconverter.model.VideoCodec
import org.libremediaconverter.model.VideoPlan
import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
import java.io.File
import java.util.concurrent.CancellationException
/**
* A job that reached Media3 with a container Media3 cannot mux.
*
* [Media3Muxers]' own KDoc names the defect this guards: *"the router claimed five containers while
* the engine silently wrote MP4 for all of them."* `factoryFor` answers null for fourteen of the
* app's containers, and `buildTransformer` turns that null into a failed job rather than letting
* `Transformer` fall back to its default muxer.
*
* The guard had never fired. `Media3Engine$buildTransformer$3` -- the `requireNotNull` message
* lambda -- was four lines and four branches at 0%, which is to say the entire repair for a defect
* the codebase went to the trouble of writing down was untested. Weakening it would restore that
* bug silently, because the wrong output is a *playable file with the wrong container*, not a crash.
*
* Same harness and same two disciplines as [Media3EngineEmptyCompositionTest]: assert the plan
* really is the one the test needs before driving the engine, and rule out
* `CancellationException` so an unresumed continuation cannot read as a pass.
*/
@UnstableApi
@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
class Media3MuxerGuardTest {
@Test
fun `a container Media3 cannot mux fails the job rather than silently writing MP4`() {
val context = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
val engine = Media3Engine(context)
val request = ConversionRequest(
spec = OutputSpec(Container.WEBM, VideoCodec.VP9, AudioCodec.OPUS),
probe = InputProbe(videoCodec = "h264", audioCodec = "aac", container = Container.MP4),
)
// The premise, asserted rather than assumed -- three separate ways this test could pass
// over a path it never entered.
val plan = CopyPlanner.plan(request.spec, request.probe)
assertEquals("the plan has to still be WebM by the time the engine sees it", Container.WEBM, plan.container)
assertNull("...and Media3 really has no muxer for it", Media3Muxers.factoryFor(plan.container))
// Not the empty-composition refusal, which fires earlier and is a different test's subject.
assertNotEquals(VideoPlan.Drop, plan.video)
assertNotEquals(AudioPlan.Drop, plan.audio)
val failure = try {
runCatching {
runBlocking {
withTimeout(TIMEOUT_MS) {
engine.transcode(Uri.parse("file:///dev/null"), File(context.cacheDir, "guard.webm"), request) {
}
}
}
}.exceptionOrNull()
} finally {
engine.close()
}
assertFalse(
"the continuation was never resumed -- the refusal escaped instead of failing the job: $failure",
failure is CancellationException,
)
// Type *and* message, and the message half is the load-bearing one. Replacing the
// requireNotNull with a fallback factory does not make the export succeed here: it lets it
// run on and fail some other way, which a bare type assertion would happily accept.
assertTrue("expected the muxer guard to refuse the job, got $failure", failure is IllegalArgumentException)
assertTrue(
"the refusal has to name the container it could not mux, got: ${failure?.message}",
failure?.message.orEmpty().contains("cannot mux") &&
failure?.message.orEmpty().contains(Container.WEBM.name),
)
}
private companion object {
/** Nothing is decoded or muxed on this path -- the guard refuses before any of that. */
const val TIMEOUT_MS = 10_000L
}
}
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
package org.libremediaconverter.convert
import android.net.Uri
import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
import org.junit.Assert.assertNull
import org.junit.Test
import org.junit.runner.RunWith
import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConcatPlanner
import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConcatStrategy
import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
/**
* A clip in a join that nothing could read, from the probe all the way to the strategy.
*
* Both halves of this are covered already, and separately: `MediaProbeTrackWalkTest` pins what
* `concatInputFrom` makes of a track list, and `ConcatPlannerTest`'s
* `an unknown codec is not treated as a match` pins what the planner does with a hand-built
* `ConcatInput(video = null)`. **Nothing spanned the two**, and the span is the load-bearing part:
* the planner's safety rests on the probe really producing that shape, and the hand-built fixture
* would go on passing if it stopped.
*
* Measured rather than asserted: mutating `concatInputFrom`'s initial `video` to a non-null
* placeholder leaves `ConcatPlannerTest` green and turns this red.
*
* ## The asymmetry this protects
*
* `ConcatPlanner` guards its video check against a null codec (`ConcatStrategy.kt:51`) and its
* audio check not at all (`:54`). **That is correct, not an oversight.** `MediaProbe.shortName`
* returns a non-null `String`, so in `concatInputFrom` a null `audioCodec` means the track is
* *absent* — and two clips with no audio genuinely do match. A null `videoCodec` carries both
* meanings, absent or unreadable, which is why only that one is guarded.
*
* So the audio check is safe *because* the video guard fires first on a clip nothing could read.
* Nothing wrote that coupling down and nothing held it.
*
* ## What this deliberately does not cover
*
* `probeForConcat`'s `catch` arm (`MediaProbe.kt:300-302`). It is **not reachable on the JVM**:
* Robolectric's `MediaExtractor` never throws from `setDataSource`, measured across an
* unregistered `content://` authority, a missing `file://`, a file of garbage bytes and an `http://`
* URL — all four returned normally with `trackCount = 0`. So the failure arrives here as an empty
* track list rather than as an exception, which reaches the same `ConcatInput(null, null, 0, 0, 0)`
* by the other road. The catch stays device-only, and this file does not pretend otherwise.
*/
@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
class UnreadableJoinInputTest {
@Test
fun `a clip nothing could read probes as unknown, and an unknown clip is re-encoded`() {
val unreadable = MediaProbe.probeForConcat(RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication(), UNREADABLE)
assertNull("an unreadable clip proves nothing about its video codec", unreadable.videoCodec)
assertNull("nor about its audio codec", unreadable.audioCodec)
assertEquals("nor about its dimensions", 0, unreadable.width)
assertEquals(0, unreadable.height)
assertEquals(0, unreadable.frameRate)
assertEquals(
"a clip nothing could read is not evidence of a match with anything",
ConcatStrategy.REENCODE,
ConcatPlanner.plan(listOf(unreadable, unreadable)),
)
}
private companion object {
/** `content://` so the probe takes the SAF branch a real pick takes. Nothing answers it. */
val UNREADABLE: Uri = Uri.parse("content://test/vanished.mp4")
}
}
@@ -166,6 +166,30 @@ class FFmpegCommandBuilderTest {
assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.OPUS), "-c:a", "libopus")
}
/**
* The arm most conversions actually take, and the only one in `audioArgs` with no test.
*
* `flac wav and opus select the right encoders` above covers the three named arms; MP3 has its
* own. AAC arrives through the `else`, so nothing named it and nothing pinned either half of
* what it emits -- neither `aac` nor `192k` appeared anywhere in this file. Both are shipped
* defaults: MP4 and M4A are the formats the picker offers first, so this is the audio
* every ordinary conversion gets.
*
* The bitrate is asserted as well as the encoder because it is the half a refactor is likelier
* to lose. An `-b:a` that quietly changed would not fail anything, would not look wrong in a
* command line, and would show up only as files that sound different from the ones the app
* produced last month.
*/
@Test
fun `aac is the default encoder, at the bitrate the app ships`() {
assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.MP4_H264), "-c:a", "aac")
assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.MP4_H264), "-b:a", "192k")
// Through the `else` rather than through a named arm, so an AAC branch added above it later
// has to keep answering the same way.
assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.M4A_AAC), "-c:a", "aac")
assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.M4A_AAC), "-b:a", "192k")
}
@Test
fun `audio only formats never carry a video encoder`() {
listOf(OutputFormat.MP3, OutputFormat.FLAC, OutputFormat.WAV, OutputFormat.OPUS)
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ class TagTableUniquenessTest {
fun `every tag constant has its own value`() {
val tags = tagsIn(
TestTags::class.java,
TestTags.Shell::class.java,
TestTags.Converter::class.java,
TestTags.Join::class.java,
)
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
package org.libremediaconverter.work
import android.app.Application
import android.net.Uri
import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
import androidx.work.Data
import androidx.work.ListenableWorker
import androidx.work.testing.TestListenableWorkerBuilder
import kotlinx.coroutines.CancellationException
import kotlinx.coroutines.runBlocking
import org.junit.After
import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
import org.junit.Assert.assertFalse
import org.junit.Assert.assertThrows
import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
import org.junit.Before
import org.junit.Test
import org.junit.runner.RunWith
import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConversionDependencies
import org.libremediaconverter.convert.HardwareTranscoder
import org.libremediaconverter.convert.SoftwareTranscoder
import org.libremediaconverter.convert.installTestWorkManager
import org.libremediaconverter.model.Container
import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConversionRequest
import org.libremediaconverter.model.DeviceCodecs
import org.libremediaconverter.model.EnginePreference
import org.libremediaconverter.model.InputProbe
import org.libremediaconverter.model.OutputFormat
import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
import java.io.File
import java.util.UUID
/**
* What happens when the hardware engine does not finish the job.
*
* `runMedia3OrFallBack` was eleven lines at 0% on the JVM and `isCancellation` had never been
* called by any unit test at all. Its own KDoc calls the fallback the protection against vendor
* hardware encoders that "cannot be tested for correctness", so it is the branch most likely to
* matter on a device nobody here owns — and it was reachable the whole time through
* `ConversionDependencies.hardware`, which no unit test had ever used.
*
* The sharp one is cancellation. `runMedia3OrFallBack` catches `Throwable`, so without the
* `isCancellation` re-throw a user cancelling a hardware transcode would have the app quietly
* start a *second* conversion in software — the one thing cancelling is supposed to prevent.
*
* `ForcedFailureTest` covers the failure half on a device. It does not cover the cancellation half,
* and this host cannot run it either way.
*/
@UnstableApi
@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
class HardwareFallbackTest {
private lateinit var app: Application
private lateinit var hardware: RecordingHardwareTranscoder
private lateinit var software: RecordingSoftwareTranscoder
@Before
fun setUp() {
app = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
hardware = RecordingHardwareTranscoder()
software = RecordingSoftwareTranscoder()
ConversionDependencies.publisher = { AlwaysRoomPublisher(app) }
ConversionDependencies.hardware = { hardware }
ConversionDependencies.software = { software }
// A probe with real codecs, not the default: `InputProbe()` reports UNPARSEABLE, which
// PERMISSIVE.canDecode refuses, and the router would send every job here straight to
// FFmpeg without any of these tests mentioning why.
ConversionDependencies.probe = { _, _ -> H264_SOURCE }
ConversionDependencies.deviceCodecs = { DeviceCodecs.PERMISSIVE }
installTestWorkManager(app, Data.EMPTY)
}
@After
fun tearDown() {
ConversionDependencies.reset()
}
@Test
fun `a hardware failure runs the job again in software, on a clean staging file`() {
hardware.failWith = { error("the vendor encoder produced nothing usable") }
val result = runBlocking { worker().doWork() }
assertTrue("the job should still succeed, got $result", result is ListenableWorker.Result.Success)
assertEquals("the hardware engine gets exactly one attempt", 1, hardware.attempts)
assertEquals("and the job then goes to software", 1, software.attempts)
// The `staged.delete()` between the two, asserted where it is observable: FFmpeg must not
// find a half-written hardware output sitting at the path it is about to write.
assertFalse(
"the partial hardware output must be gone before FFmpeg starts",
software.outputExistedOnEntry,
)
assertEquals("the hardware engine is closed either way", 1, hardware.closes)
}
@Test
fun `a cancelled hardware transcode is not quietly retried in software`() {
hardware.failWith = { throw CancellationException("the user pressed Cancel") }
assertThrows(CancellationException::class.java) { runBlocking { worker().doWork() } }
assertEquals("the hardware engine ran", 1, hardware.attempts)
assertEquals(
"cancelling must not start a second conversion -- that is the whole point of cancelling",
0,
software.attempts,
)
assertEquals("and the engine is still closed on the way out", 1, hardware.closes)
}
@Test
fun `a hardware transcode that works never reaches the software engine`() {
val result = runBlocking { worker().doWork() }
assertTrue("got $result", result is ListenableWorker.Result.Success)
assertEquals(1, hardware.attempts)
assertEquals("the fallback is a fallback, not a second pass", 0, software.attempts)
assertEquals(1, hardware.closes)
}
/**
* #169: the display-name fallback, which reaches further than the notification title.
*
* `inputData.getString(KEY_DISPLAY_NAME) ?: "input"` had never taken its right-hand side. The
* value is not only the foreground notification's title: it feeds `outputNameFor`, so it is
* also the filename offered in the user's save dialog. A job enqueued by an older build, or
* built by hand, carries no such key.
*/
@Test
fun `a job that names no input file still suggests an output name`() {
val result = runBlocking { worker(displayName = null).doWork() }
assertTrue("got $result", result is ListenableWorker.Result.Success)
val suggested = (result as ListenableWorker.Result.Success)
.outputData.getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_SUGGESTED_NAME)
assertTrue(
"expected a name built from the fallback, got $suggested",
suggested.orEmpty().startsWith("input"),
)
}
private fun worker(displayName: String? = DISPLAY_NAME): ConversionWorker {
val spec = OutputFormat.MP4_H265.spec
val entries = buildMap<String, Any> {
put(ConversionWorker.KEY_INPUT_URI, INPUT.toString())
displayName?.let { put(ConversionWorker.KEY_DISPLAY_NAME, it) }
put(ConversionWorker.KEY_SIZE_BYTES, INPUT_BYTES)
put(ConversionWorker.KEY_CONTAINER, spec.container.name)
put(ConversionWorker.KEY_VIDEO_CODEC, spec.videoCodec.name)
put(ConversionWorker.KEY_AUDIO_CODEC, spec.audioCodec.name)
// AUTO rather than FORCE_SOFTWARE, which is what every other worker test uses and is
// exactly why this path had no coverage: forcing software never enters the function.
put(ConversionWorker.KEY_ENGINE_PREFERENCE, EnginePreference.AUTO.name)
}
return TestListenableWorkerBuilder<ConversionWorker>(
context = app,
inputData = Data.Builder().putAll(entries).build(),
runAttemptCount = 0,
).setId(JOB_ID).build()
}
private companion object {
val INPUT: Uri = Uri.parse("file:///tmp/holiday.mp4")
const val DISPLAY_NAME = "holiday.mp4"
const val INPUT_BYTES = 1024L
val JOB_ID: UUID = UUID.fromString("00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000009")
val H264_SOURCE = InputProbe(
videoCodec = "h264",
audioCodec = "aac",
container = Container.MP4,
durationMs = 1_000,
)
}
}
/**
* A hardware engine that writes something before it fails, and remembers being closed.
*
* Writing first is the point, exactly as it is for `PartialThenFailingTranscoder`: an engine that
* only threw would let a missing `staged.delete()` pass unnoticed.
*/
@UnstableApi
private class RecordingHardwareTranscoder : HardwareTranscoder {
var attempts = 0
var closes = 0
var failWith: (() -> Unit)? = null
override suspend fun transcode(input: Uri, output: File, request: ConversionRequest, onProgress: (Int) -> Unit) {
attempts++
output.writeBytes(ByteArray(PARTIAL_BYTES))
failWith?.invoke()
}
override fun close() {
closes++
}
private companion object {
const val PARTIAL_BYTES = 2048
}
}
/** The software engine, recording whether the hardware attempt's leftovers were cleared first. */
private class RecordingSoftwareTranscoder : SoftwareTranscoder {
var attempts = 0
var outputExistedOnEntry = false
override suspend fun run(
request: ConversionRequest,
inputPath: String,
output: File,
durationMs: Long,
onProgress: (Int) -> Unit,
) {
attempts++
outputExistedOnEntry = output.exists()
output.writeBytes(ByteArray(OUTPUT_BYTES))
}
private companion object {
const val OUTPUT_BYTES = 512
}
}
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
package org.libremediaconverter.work
import android.app.Notification
import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
import androidx.work.Data
import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
import org.junit.Assert.assertNotEquals
import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
import org.junit.Before
import org.junit.Test
import org.junit.runner.RunWith
import org.libremediaconverter.convert.installTestWorkManager
import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
import java.util.UUID
/**
* The two things a progress notification can say, and that they are not the same thing.
*
* An assertion gap rather than a coverage one, and the distinction is the reason this file exists.
* JaCoCo is green on `build`'s `if (indeterminate)`, because `ProgressNotificationTest` drives it
* through a real worker -- but that test reads only the notification id and
* `Notification.EXTRA_PROGRESS`. **Nothing had ever read the text.** Swapping the two branches, or
* collapsing them into one string, passed the entire suite.
*
* What it costs to get wrong is small and constant: a conversion that has been running for four
* minutes still saying "Preparing", or one that has not started reporting yet claiming 0%. Neither
* is a crash, and neither would be found by anything else here -- which is exactly the kind of
* thing that survives for a long time.
*
* Nothing else in the suite constructs [ConversionNotifications] directly.
*/
@UnstableApi
@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
class NotificationProgressTextTest {
/**
* `build` reaches `WorkManager.getInstance` for the Cancel action's PendingIntent, so the
* notification cannot be built at all without one. That coupling is why nothing had ever
* constructed this class directly and read what it produced.
*/
@Before
fun setUp() {
installTestWorkManager(RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication(), Data.EMPTY)
}
@Test
fun `an indeterminate notification says something different from a measured one`() {
val context = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
val notifications = ConversionNotifications(context)
val preparing = notifications.build(JOB_ID, TITLE, percent = 0, indeterminate = true).text()
val measured = notifications.build(JOB_ID, TITLE, percent = 42, indeterminate = false).text()
assertNotEquals(
"the two states have to read differently, or the text says nothing at all",
preparing,
measured,
)
assertTrue(
"a measured notification has to carry its percentage, got \"$measured\"",
measured.contains("42"),
)
assertTrue(
"an indeterminate one must not invent one, got \"$preparing\"",
!preparing.contains("42") && !preparing.contains("0"),
)
}
/**
* The title is the caller's, not the builder's -- it is the file the user picked, and it is what
* tells two simultaneous conversions apart in the shade.
*/
@Test
fun `the notification is titled with the file it is converting`() {
val context = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
val built = ConversionNotifications(context).build(JOB_ID, TITLE, percent = 10)
assertEquals(TITLE, built.extras.getString(Notification.EXTRA_TITLE))
}
private fun Notification.text(): String = extras.getString(Notification.EXTRA_TEXT).orEmpty()
private companion object {
const val TITLE = "holiday.mp4"
val JOB_ID: UUID = UUID.fromString("00000000-0000-4000-8000-00000000000a")
}
}