Merge branch 'main' into fix/dead-assertion-probe-test

Lint the bash inside the workflows, not only the bash in files

.github/workflows/build.yml

@@ -81,7 +81,11 @@ jobs:
 
       - name: Verify the released artifacts
         run: |
-          APK=$(ls app/build/outputs/apk/release/*.apk | head -1)
+          # A glob, not `ls | head`: the glob is already here, and parsing ls is what
+          # SC2012 is about. Gradle's names have no spaces today, which is exactly the
+          # kind of assumption that holds until it does not.
+          apks=(app/build/outputs/apk/release/*.apk)
+          APK="${apks[0]}"
           # A release that shipped one ABI, or lost 16 KB alignment, would install
           # fine on a test device and fail for users or at Play submission. Both are
           # cheap to check and expensive to discover later.

.github/workflows/status_check.yml

@@ -182,6 +182,23 @@ jobs:
           docker run --rm "$SHELLCHECK" --version
           git ls-files -z '*.sh' | xargs -0 -r docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/mnt" "$SHELLCHECK"
 
+      # actionlint closes the half shellcheck cannot see. The step above reads .sh files;
+      # a good deal of this repo's bash lives in inline `run:` blocks instead -- the release
+      # verification here, the emulator setup and teardown in this file and in
+      # api37-debug.yml. actionlint parses each workflow and runs shellcheck over every
+      # `run:`, on top of its own checks for expression syntax, `needs:` references, matrix
+      # keys and action input names.
+      #
+      # Pinned by digest for the same reason shellcheck is, and with a second reason of its
+      # own: actionlint's documented install is `bash <(curl -s .../download-actionlint.bash)`
+      # off a moving branch, which would sit badly in a repo that pins every action by SHA.
+      - name: actionlint
+        env:
+          ACTIONLINT: rhysd/actionlint@sha256:9d36088643581e728c969f35141f88139fec77280b2be23c1f66f8e40e1025e7
+        run: |
+          docker run --rm "$ACTIONLINT" -version
+          docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/repo" -w /repo "$ACTIONLINT" -color
+
       # `!cancelled()` rather than a plain sequence: a shellcheck failure above must not
       # cost the ktlint/detekt/lint lists. Same reason this step passes --continue -- one
       # round trip should produce every list, not stop at the first.

CLAUDE.md

@@ -185,11 +185,12 @@ install for code that can never run — and on API 37 the full APK does not fit
   `podman run --rm -v "$PWD:/mnt:z" docker.io/koalaman/shellcheck@sha256:61862eba... <files>`
   (the digest is in `status_check.yml`; there is no shellcheck system package on this host).
 
-  **It does not cover inline `run:` blocks in the workflows**, and a good deal of this repo's bash
-  lives there. `actionlint` does cover them — it runs shellcheck over each `run:` — and reports one
-  pre-existing `info` finding in `build.yml`. It is not wired in because every action here is
-  pinned by SHA, and actionlint's usual installer is a `curl | bash` off a moving branch; doing it
-  properly means pinning a container digest. Tracked separately rather than bolted on.
+  **`actionlint` covers the half shellcheck cannot see** — the inline `run:` blocks, where a good
+  deal of this repo's bash lives. It runs shellcheck over each `run:` plus its own checks on
+  expression syntax, `needs:` references, matrix keys and action inputs. It sits in the same job,
+  **pinned by digest** for the reason above and one of its own: its documented installer is a
+  `curl | bash` off a moving branch, which does not belong in a repo that pins every action by SHA.
+  Locally: `podman run --rm -v "$PWD:/repo:z" -w /repo docker.io/rhysd/actionlint@sha256:9d360886... -color`.
 
 ## Dependency versions
 

app/src/test/java/org/libremediaconverter/convert/ConversionViewModelProbeFailureTest.kt

@@ -140,10 +140,16 @@ class ConversionViewModelProbeFailureTest {
     private fun pickedProbe(): InputProbe? {
         val viewModel = ConversionViewModel(app, Dispatchers.Unconfined)
         viewModel.onInputPicked(INPUT)
+        // The predicate is the guard, and it is the only one needed. It requires `Ready`, so a
+        // pick that ended in `Failed` never satisfies it and `awaitState` fails on its timeout
+        // naming what it was waiting for -- "Ready with a probe" -- which says more than a
+        // separate assertion could. A `ready as? ConversionState.Failed` check used to sit here
+        // and was dead: `Ready` and `Failed` are sibling subtypes of one sealed interface, so
+        // the cast was always null and the assertNull could never fire. Measured, not assumed --
+        // flipping it to assertNotNull failed all three callers of this helper.
         val ready = awaitState(viewModel.state, "Ready with a probe") {
             it is ConversionState.Ready && it.input.probe != null
         }
-        assertNull("nothing here should reach a terminal failure", (ready as? ConversionState.Failed))
         return (ready as ConversionState.Ready).input.probe
     }