B3 (#175 ): pin the AAC arm every ordinary conversion takes

audioArgs has six arms. Five are named codecs with tests; AAC arrives through the `else`, so nothing named it -- neither "aac" nor "192k" appeared anywhere in FFmpegCommandBuilderTest. It is the audio MP4 and M4A get, which is to say the audio the picker offers first and most conversions produce. Both halves are asserted, and the bitrate is the half worth arguing for: an -b:a that quietly changed would fail nothing, look wrong in no command line, and surface only as files that sound different from the ones the app produced last month. Both mutations confirmed red -- 192k -> 128k and aac -> libfdk_aac. Asserted through MP4_H264 and M4A_AAC rather than one of them, so an AAC arm added above the `else` later has to keep answering the same way for both. **Deliberately not added here: an ENCODABLE_AUDIO-vs-audioArgs agreement test**, the obvious companion to VideoCodecMimeAgreementTest. It would freeze the answer to F1, which is open: ContainerCapabilities.kt:84 says "nothing here emits a Vorbis encoder" and FFmpegCommandBuilder.kt:188 does. docs/coverage-read-findings.md says in terms that the tempting fix there locks in the wrong answer and that the decision comes first. This is the AAC arm only. 563 -> 564 JVM tests, 0 failures. No production code changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
B2 (#174 ): read what the progress notification actually says
2026-09-01 21:50:31 -05:00 · 2026-09-01 21:48:36 -05:00 · 2026-09-01 21:45:43 -05:00 · 2026-09-01 21:42:27 -05:00 · 2026-09-01 21:37:45 -05:00 · 2026-09-01 21:31:21 -05:00
24 changed files with 2173 additions and 143 deletions
@@ -130,9 +130,9 @@ install for code that can never run — and on API 37 the full APK does not fit
 - The `model` package is excluded from `ReturnCount` and `CyclomaticComplexMethod` only. It is the
  decision layer, where one branch is one documented user-visible outcome and the metric counts
  answers rather than complexity. Every other rule still applies there.
- **Coverage is reported, not gated** — **87.1% of lines (2025/2324), 69.1% of branches
-  (974/1410)**, measured 2026-08-27 with `./gradlew :app:jacocoTestReport`, against 502 JVM tests
-  in 71 classes.
+- **Coverage is reported, not gated** — **88.9% of lines (2087/2348), 75.4% of branches
+  (1011/1340)**, measured 2026-08-29 with `./gradlew :app:jacocoTestReport`, against 546 JVM tests
+  in 76 classes.

  **Every figure this file carried before 2026-08-24 was an artifact, roughly half the real one.**
  Robolectric loads classes through its own sandbox classloader with no source location, JaCoCo
@@ -159,6 +159,21 @@ install for code that can never run — and on API 37 the full APK does not fit
  chooses a branch the suite had never taken. Line coverage barely notices; branch coverage is the
  whole point.

+  Then #153's five children on 2026-08-29 — 87.1% -> 88.9% line, 69.1% -> **75.4%** branch, 502 ->
+  546 tests.
+
+  **That last branch figure moved for two reasons, and only one of them is new tests.** The
+  numerator rose 974 -> 1011; the denominator *fell* 1410 -> 1340. Both are the seam work. Pulling
+  a `when` out of a lambda inside a `collect` deletes the coroutine state machine's synthesized
+  branches around it, and what is left is a plain function whose branches a test can choose:
+  `ConversionViewModel$observe$1$1` went from carrying the whole mapping to 6 branches, while the
+  extracted `ConversionViewModelKt` covers 41 of 42 and `JoinViewModelKt` 38 of 39. So a seam is
+  worth more than the tests it enables — it also stops the measurement counting scaffolding.
+
+  Be careful quoting a branch move on its own for that reason. A percentage that rises because the
+  denominator shrank is not the same claim as one that rises because more branches are tested, and
+  this entry has a history of explaining its own numbers wrongly.
+
  And **re-measure before quoting**: this entry was once written quoting 81.4%, measured four hours
  earlier, and was already three points stale by the time it was ready to merge.
 - **Testable code is not done until it is tested.** If a piece is unit testable, it gets unit
@@ -182,6 +197,32 @@ install for code that can never run — and on API 37 the full APK does not fit

 - `kotlin.code.style=official`. Gradle stays Kotlin DSL.

+- **A stacked PR does not merge with `gh pr merge`, and `MERGED` is not proof it reached `main`.**
+  Two separate traps, both measured on 2026-08-27 while landing #144-#151.
+
+  `gh pr merge` uses the GraphQL mutation, which refuses a stacked PR outright: *"This pull request
+  is part of a stack and must be merged using the asynchronous merge REST API."* So does
+  `PUT .../pulls/{n}/merge`. The one that works is
+  `gh api -X PUT repos/OWNER/REPO/pulls/N/merge-async -f merge_method=merge`, which returns a uuid
+  to poll at `.../merge-async/{uuid}` until `status` is `merged` or `failed`.
+
+  **The second trap is worse, because nothing looks wrong.** GitHub retargets a stacked PR's base
+  to `main` when the PR below it merges, but *asynchronously*. Merge a stack faster than that
+  settles — five PRs about thirty seconds apart, in the case that found this — and each one merges
+  into its own base branch, which has itself already been merged and left behind. Every call
+  returns `status: merged` and every one is true. `gh pr list --state open` comes back empty, every
+  PR shows `MERGED`, and **none of the content is on `main`**.
+
+  What caught it was a coverage re-measure reading two points lower than the same tree had measured
+  an hour earlier; a fresh `git pull` changed nothing, which is what turned it into a question.
+  `git merge-base --is-ancestor <merge-sha> origin/main` answers it in one line. Do that after
+  merging a stack, or merge one at a time and re-read `baseRefName` between. #160 is what the
+  recovery cost.
+
+  The auto-retarget belongs to the stacking feature specifically. A PR opened with a plain
+  `gh pr create --base some-branch` does **not** retarget when that branch merges — it is left
+  pointing at a dead base and has to be moved by hand.
+
 - **File one-off issues with `tools/github/file-issue.sh`, not `gh issue create`.** `gh issue
  create` does not touch the project board, so the issue exists, carries its labels, and is
  invisible in the Kanban — indistinguishable from never having been filed. Measured 2026-08-24:
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import android.util.Log
 import androidx.lifecycle.AndroidViewModel
 import androidx.lifecycle.viewModelScope
 import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.Data
 import androidx.work.WorkInfo
 import androidx.work.WorkManager
 import kotlinx.coroutines.CoroutineDispatcher
@@ -71,6 +72,119 @@ data class InputFile(
    val probe: InputProbe? = null,
 )

+/**
+ * One update about a running conversion, as WorkManager last reported it.
+ *
+ * Only the fields [conversionStateFrom] reads — the same shape, and for the same reason, as
+ * `JobSnapshot` beside `Reattachment.choose`: the rule stays testable on the JVM because nothing
+ * in it needs a `WorkInfo`, which a test cannot readily build.
+ *
+ * [outputData] stays a `Data` rather than being unpacked into five nullable strings. It is what a
+ * test already builds with `workDataOf` everywhere in this suite, so unpacking would move the same
+ * reads without making anything easier to drive.
+ */
+internal data class ConversionUpdate(
+    val state: WorkInfo.State,
+    val progressPercent: Int,
+    val runAttemptCount: Int,
+    val outputData: Data,
+)
+
+/**
+ * What the screen should show, given what WorkManager last said about the job.
+ *
+ * ## Why this is a function rather than the body of a `collect`
+ *
+ * It was the body of one. `workManager` is built in the constructor from `WorkManager.getInstance`,
+ * `observe` is private, and nothing could hand either a chosen `WorkInfo` — so every arm below ran
+ * only when a real worker happened to produce it. A real worker produces a terminal state with
+ * well-formed output, which meant six of these arms had never been chosen by any test: the progress
+ * read, both sides of the retry check, a success with no file, a failure with nothing to say, and
+ * the two that map to a state the user cannot otherwise reach.
+ *
+ * That is the argument #141 made for `MediaProbe`'s track walk, against `WorkManager` instead of a
+ * media fixture, and it takes the same answer: the branch matrix is a pure function, and what is
+ * left needing the framework — the flow, the null check, the ownership check — is the thin edge.
+ *
+ * ## What is deliberately *not* in here
+ *
+ * The ownership check stays at the call site. Its comment is explicit that it guards the file
+ * ownership the `SUCCEEDED` arm takes, not merely the assignment, so moving it inside would change
+ * what it protects. And this function takes no responsibility for the staged file: it returns the
+ * state, and the caller reads the file off it. A pure function that deletes files is not a seam.
+ *
+ * @param cancelled where a cancellation lands, which differs for a reattached job — see [observe].
+ * @param fallbackSpec the current settings, read only when finished work predates the worker
+ *   reporting its own name and MIME type.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+internal fun conversionStateFrom(
+    update: ConversionUpdate,
+    input: InputFile,
+    cancelled: ConversionState,
+    fallbackSpec: OutputSpec,
+): ConversionState = when (update.state) {
+    WorkInfo.State.RUNNING -> ConversionState.Converting(input, update.progressPercent)
+
+    // ENQUEUED after a run means a retry is pending. Either the six-hour foreground budget ran out
+    // mid-job, or the system refused to let the job start again while the app was in the background
+    // — the second being the likelier of the two, since it needs only a process restart. Nothing
+    // here can tell them apart, and nothing needs to: the answer is the same.
+    WorkInfo.State.ENQUEUED ->
+        if (update.runAttemptCount > 0) {
+            ConversionState.Waiting(input)
+        } else {
+            ConversionState.Converting(input, 0)
+        }
+
+    WorkInfo.State.SUCCEEDED -> convertedFrom(update.outputData, input, fallbackSpec)
+
+    // A worker that dies before it can report anything leaves no output data at all — a
+    // foreground-service start refused after a process restart is one way — and an exception's
+    // message can be an empty string. Both would read as a failure with nothing said, so blank
+    // falls back like missing does.
+    WorkInfo.State.FAILED -> ConversionState.Failed(
+        update.outputData.getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_ERROR)
+            ?.takeIf { it.isNotBlank() }
+            ?: ConversionWorker.GENERIC_FAILURE_MESSAGE,
+    )
+
+    WorkInfo.State.CANCELLED -> cancelled
+    WorkInfo.State.BLOCKED -> ConversionState.Converting(input, 0)
+}
+
+/**
+ * The `SUCCEEDED` arm, which is the only one that reads more than one field.
+ *
+ * Split out so [conversionStateFrom] stays a table of one line per state. A success with no output
+ * path is a failure: the job said it finished and named nothing, and there is no file to offer.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+private fun convertedFrom(outputData: Data, input: InputFile, fallbackSpec: OutputSpec): ConversionState {
+    val path = outputData.getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH)
+        ?: return ConversionState.Failed(SUCCEEDED_WITHOUT_A_FILE_MESSAGE)
+    return ConversionState.Converted(
+        input = input,
+        staged = File(path),
+        engineUsed = outputData.getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_ENGINE_USED).orEmpty(),
+        routeReason = outputData.getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_ROUTE_REASON).orEmpty(),
+        // Work enqueued before the worker reported this carries nothing, and WorkManager keeps
+        // finished work for about a week -- so this branch is ordinary for a few days rather than a
+        // corner. It is the old derivation, kept because it is the same guess the app already made
+        // and there is genuinely nothing better available for such a job. New work never reaches it.
+        suggestedName = outputData.getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_SUGGESTED_NAME)
+            ?.takeIf { it.isNotBlank() }
+            ?: ConversionWorker.outputNameFor(input.displayName, fallbackSpec),
+        mimeType = outputData.getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_MIME_TYPE)
+            ?.takeIf { it.isNotBlank() }
+            ?: fallbackSpec.mimeType,
+    )
+}
+
+/** A job that reported success and named no file. There is nothing to offer the user to save. */
+internal const val SUCCEEDED_WITHOUT_A_FILE_MESSAGE: String =
+    "Conversion reported success but produced no file."
+
 sealed interface ConversionState {
    data object Idle : ConversionState
    data class Ready(val input: InputFile) : ConversionState
@@ -442,75 +556,24 @@ class ConversionViewModel @JvmOverloads constructor(
                // that either. The state and `pendingStaged` are meant to refer to the same file
                // or to no file, and this is where that stays true.
                if (!ownership.stillHeldBy(token)) return@collect
-                _state.value = when (info.state) {
-                    WorkInfo.State.RUNNING -> ConversionState.Converting(
-                        input,
-                        info.progress.getInt(ConversionWorker.KEY_PROGRESS, 0),
-                    )
-
-                    // ENQUEUED after a run means a retry is pending. Either the six-hour
-                    // foreground budget ran out mid-job, or the system refused to let the job
-                    // start again while the app was in the background — the second being the
-                    // likelier of the two, since it needs only a process restart. Nothing here
-                    // can tell them apart, and nothing needs to: the answer is the same.
-                    WorkInfo.State.ENQUEUED ->
-                        if (info.runAttemptCount > 0) {
-                            ConversionState.Waiting(input)
-                        } else {
-                            ConversionState.Converting(input, 0)
-                        }
-
-                    WorkInfo.State.SUCCEEDED -> {
-                        val path = info.outputData.getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH)
-                        if (path == null) {
-                            ConversionState.Failed("Conversion reported success but produced no file.")
-                        } else {
-                            val staged = File(path)
-                            // Take responsibility for the file at the same moment the state
-                            // starts referring to it, so the two cannot disagree.
-                            pendingStaged = staged
-                            ConversionState.Converted(
-                                input = input,
-                                staged = staged,
-                                engineUsed = info.outputData
-                                    .getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_ENGINE_USED).orEmpty(),
-                                routeReason = info.outputData
-                                    .getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_ROUTE_REASON).orEmpty(),
-                                suggestedName = info.outputData
-                                    .getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_SUGGESTED_NAME)
-                                    ?.takeIf { it.isNotBlank() }
-                                    // Work enqueued before the worker reported this carries
-                                    // nothing, and WorkManager keeps finished work for about a
-                                    // week -- so this branch is ordinary for a few days rather
-                                    // than a corner. It is the old derivation, kept because it is
-                                    // the same guess the app already made and there is genuinely
-                                    // nothing better available for such a job. New work never
-                                    // reaches it.
-                                    ?: ConversionWorker.outputNameFor(
-                                        input.displayName,
-                                        _settings.value.spec,
-                                    ),
-                                mimeType = info.outputData
-                                    .getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_MIME_TYPE)
-                                    ?.takeIf { it.isNotBlank() }
-                                    ?: _settings.value.spec.mimeType,
-                            )
-                        }
-                    }
-
-                    // A worker that dies before it can report anything leaves no output data at
-                    // all — a foreground-service start refused after a process restart is one
-                    // way — and an exception's message can be an empty string. Both would read
-                    // as a failure with nothing said, so blank falls back like missing does.
-                    WorkInfo.State.FAILED -> ConversionState.Failed(
-                        info.outputData.getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_ERROR)
-                            ?.takeIf { it.isNotBlank() }
-                            ?: "Conversion failed.",
-                    )
-
-                    WorkInfo.State.CANCELLED -> cancelled
-                    WorkInfo.State.BLOCKED -> ConversionState.Converting(input, 0)
-                }
+                val next = conversionStateFrom(
+                    ConversionUpdate(
+                        state = info.state,
+                        progressPercent = info.progress.getInt(ConversionWorker.KEY_PROGRESS, 0),
+                        runAttemptCount = info.runAttemptCount,
+                        outputData = info.outputData,
+                    ),
+                    input = input,
+                    cancelled = cancelled,
+                    fallbackSpec = _settings.value.spec,
+                )
+                // Take responsibility for the file at the same moment the state starts referring
+                // to it, so the two cannot disagree. Read off the result rather than assigned
+                // inside the mapping: `Converted` is the only state that carries a staged file, so
+                // "the state and `pendingStaged` refer to the same file or to no file" is now the
+                // shape of the code rather than a rule two branches have to keep.
+                if (next is ConversionState.Converted) pendingStaged = next.staged
+                _state.value = next
            }
        }
    }
@@ -565,7 +628,7 @@ class ConversionViewModel @JvmOverloads constructor(
                // than a fresh handle for the second failure's sake: a retry that fails again
                // lands back here still carrying the file, not on a bare Failed that would take
                // the offer away.
-                _state.value = ConversionState.Failed(e.message ?: "Could not save the file.", pending)
+                _state.value = ConversionState.Failed(e.message ?: SAVE_FAILED_MESSAGE, pending)
            }
        }
    }
@@ -94,24 +94,61 @@ fun ConverterScreen(modifier: Modifier = Modifier, viewModel: ConversionViewMode
        state = state,
        settings = settings,
        validation = validation,
-        actions = ConverterActions(
+        actions = converterActions(
+            viewModel = viewModel,
            onPickInput = { pickInput.launch(arrayOf("*/*")) },
-            onPreset = viewModel::setPreset,
-            onContainer = viewModel::setContainer,
-            onVideoCodec = viewModel::setVideoCodec,
-            onAudioCodec = viewModel::setAudioCodec,
-            onSuggestion = viewModel::applySuggestion,
-            onQuality = viewModel::setQuality,
-            onEnginePreference = viewModel::setEnginePreference,
            onConvert = { requestNotifications.launch(Manifest.permission.POST_NOTIFICATIONS) },
-            onCancel = viewModel::cancel,
            onSave = { suggestedName -> chooseDestination.launch(suggestedName) },
-            onReset = viewModel::reset,
        ),
        modifier = modifier,
    )
 }

+/**
+ * Which of the ViewModel's methods each affordance on the screen calls.
+ *
+ * ## Why this is a function rather than an argument list
+ *
+ * It was an argument list, inside [ConverterScreen], which no test reached: `ConverterScreenContent`
+ * builds its own [ConverterActions], so every test in the suite drove the stateless inner and none
+ * of them ever saw the wiring.
+ *
+ * Most of the list is safe without a test, and saying so is more useful than pretending otherwise:
+ * `onContainer`, `onVideoCodec`, `onAudioCodec`, `onPreset`, `onSuggestion`, `onQuality` and
+ * `onEnginePreference` each take a distinct type, so binding one to another's setter does not
+ * compile. Verified rather than assumed — swapping `onVideoCodec` and `onAudioCodec` fails with
+ * *"Inapplicable candidate(s): fun setAudioCodec(codec: AudioCodec)"*.
+ *
+ * **[ConverterActions.onCancel] and [ConverterActions.onReset] are the exception.** Both are
+ * `() -> Unit`, so swapping them compiles silently — also verified — and ships a Cancel button that
+ * throws the conversion away and a Start-over button that leaves it on screen. That pair is what
+ * `ConverterWiringTest` exists for.
+ *
+ * The three launcher-backed actions stay parameters: they need an `ActivityResultLauncher`, which
+ * is the part that genuinely needs the composition, and keeping them out means the rest can be
+ * checked without one.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+internal fun converterActions(
+    viewModel: ConversionViewModel,
+    onPickInput: () -> Unit,
+    onConvert: () -> Unit,
+    onSave: (suggestedName: String) -> Unit,
+): ConverterActions = ConverterActions(
+    onPickInput = onPickInput,
+    onPreset = viewModel::setPreset,
+    onContainer = viewModel::setContainer,
+    onVideoCodec = viewModel::setVideoCodec,
+    onAudioCodec = viewModel::setAudioCodec,
+    onSuggestion = viewModel::applySuggestion,
+    onQuality = viewModel::setQuality,
+    onEnginePreference = viewModel::setEnginePreference,
+    onConvert = onConvert,
+    onCancel = viewModel::cancel,
+    onSave = onSave,
+    onReset = viewModel::reset,
+)
+
 /**
 * Everything [ConverterScreenContent] can ask for, in one value.
 *
@@ -24,6 +24,20 @@ const val STAGED_FILE_GONE_MESSAGE: String =
    "The finished file is no longer in the cache, so there is nothing left to save. " +
        "Start over to make it again."

+/**
+ * What to tell the user when the copy into their chosen destination did not finish.
+ *
+ * A fallback, not the usual message: `publish` throws with a real reason most of the time — the
+ * volume filled, the provider revoked the grant — and that reason is better than this. This is for
+ * the exception that arrives with nothing to say, which would otherwise reach the screen as an
+ * empty failure.
+ *
+ * Kept next to [STAGED_FILE_GONE_MESSAGE] for exactly the reason that one names: **both ViewModels
+ * need it**, and saving is what it is about. It was written out twice before — `ConversionViewModel`
+ * and `JoinViewModel` each carried their own copy of the literal, agreeing by coincidence.
+ */
+const val SAVE_FAILED_MESSAGE: String = "Could not save the file."
+
 /**
 * A staged file that is still there to be saved, and everything the save dialog needs to offer it.
 *
@@ -56,17 +56,38 @@ fun JoinScreen(modifier: Modifier = Modifier, viewModel: JoinViewModel = viewMod

    JoinScreenContent(
        state = state,
-        actions = JoinActions(
+        actions = joinActions(
+            viewModel = viewModel,
            onPickInputs = { pickInputs.launch(arrayOf("video/*")) },
-            onJoin = viewModel::join,
-            onCancel = viewModel::cancel,
            onSave = { suggestedName -> chooseDestination.launch(suggestedName) },
-            onReset = viewModel::reset,
        ),
        modifier = modifier,
    )
 }

+/**
+ * Which of the ViewModel's methods each affordance on the join screen calls.
+ *
+ * The join-side twin of `converterActions`, and the transposition risk here is worse: **three**
+ * `() -> Unit` bindings rather than two. `onJoin`, `onCancel` and `onReset` are mutually
+ * interchangeable as far as the compiler is concerned, so a Join button that cancels, or a Cancel
+ * button that starts the job, is a swap nothing but a test would catch.
+ *
+ * See `converterActions` for why the launcher-backed actions stay parameters.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+internal fun joinActions(
+    viewModel: JoinViewModel,
+    onPickInputs: () -> Unit,
+    onSave: (suggestedName: String) -> Unit,
+): JoinActions = JoinActions(
+    onPickInputs = onPickInputs,
+    onJoin = viewModel::join,
+    onCancel = viewModel::cancel,
+    onSave = onSave,
+    onReset = viewModel::reset,
+)
+
 /**
 * Everything [JoinScreenContent] can ask for, in one value.
 *
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ import android.net.Uri
 import androidx.lifecycle.AndroidViewModel
 import androidx.lifecycle.viewModelScope
 import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.Data
 import androidx.work.WorkInfo
 import androidx.work.WorkManager
 import kotlinx.coroutines.CoroutineDispatcher
@@ -19,6 +20,7 @@ import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConversionDependencies
 import org.libremediaconverter.convert.InputFile
 import org.libremediaconverter.convert.InputQuery
 import org.libremediaconverter.convert.PendingSave
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.SAVE_FAILED_MESSAGE
 import org.libremediaconverter.convert.STAGED_FILE_GONE_MESSAGE
 import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ScreenOwnership
 import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConcatStrategy
@@ -29,6 +31,108 @@ import org.libremediaconverter.work.jobSnapshots
 import java.io.File
 import java.util.UUID

+/**
+ * One update about a running join, as WorkManager last reported it.
+ *
+ * The join-side twin of `ConversionUpdate`, and deliberately the same shape: this pair of seams is
+ * one refactor done twice, and letting them diverge would make the two flows harder to compare than
+ * the duplication costs. There is no `progressPercent` here because `ConcatWorker` publishes none —
+ * a join is indeterminate.
+ */
+internal data class JoinUpdate(val state: WorkInfo.State, val runAttemptCount: Int, val outputData: Data)
+
+/**
+ * What the join screen should show, given what WorkManager last said about the job.
+ *
+ * The join-side twin of `conversionStateFrom`, extracted for the same reason and with the same two
+ * exclusions: the ownership check stays at the call site, and this takes no responsibility for the
+ * staged file. See that function's KDoc for the argument in full.
+ *
+ * Five arms had never been chosen by any test before this was cut out, because a real `ConcatWorker`
+ * only ever produces a terminal state with well-formed output.
+ *
+ * @param cancelled where a cancellation lands, which differs for a reattached job — see [observe].
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+internal fun joinStateFrom(update: JoinUpdate, inputs: List<InputFile>, cancelled: JoinState): JoinState =
+    when (update.state) {
+        // BLOCKED is a job waiting on a prerequisite, which the user has nothing to do about and
+        // nothing useful to be told about. It reads as "starting", like a fresh ENQUEUED.
+        WorkInfo.State.RUNNING, WorkInfo.State.BLOCKED -> JoinState.Joining(inputs)
+
+        // ENQUEUED after a run means a retry is pending -- the same rule, and the same reasoning, as
+        // the convert side. See `conversionStateFrom`.
+        WorkInfo.State.ENQUEUED ->
+            if (update.runAttemptCount > 0) {
+                JoinState.Waiting(inputs)
+            } else {
+                JoinState.Joining(inputs)
+            }
+
+        WorkInfo.State.SUCCEEDED -> joinedFrom(update.outputData)
+
+        // A worker that dies before it can report anything leaves no output data at all, and an
+        // exception's message can be an empty string. Both would read as a failure with nothing said,
+        // so blank falls back like missing does.
+        WorkInfo.State.FAILED -> JoinState.Failed(
+            update.outputData.getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_ERROR)
+                ?.takeIf { it.isNotBlank() }
+                ?: ConcatWorker.GENERIC_FAILURE_MESSAGE,
+        )
+
+        WorkInfo.State.CANCELLED -> cancelled
+    }
+
+/**
+ * The `SUCCEEDED` arm. A join that reported success and named no file has nothing to offer.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+private fun joinedFrom(outputData: Data): JoinState {
+    val path = outputData.getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH)
+        ?: return JoinState.Failed(JOINED_WITHOUT_A_FILE_MESSAGE)
+    return JoinState.Joined(
+        staged = File(path),
+        strategy = strategyFrom(outputData.getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_STRATEGY)),
+        // A join enqueued before the worker reported these carries neither, and the fallback is
+        // the format such a job really used -- ConcatWorker.request has always defaulted to it,
+        // and the join screen has never offered a choice.
+        suggestedName = outputData.getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_SUGGESTED_NAME)
+            ?.takeIf { it.isNotBlank() }
+            ?: ConcatWorker.outputNameFor(ConcatWorker.DEFAULT_FORMAT),
+        mimeType = outputData.getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_MIME_TYPE)
+            ?.takeIf { it.isNotBlank() }
+            ?: ConcatWorker.DEFAULT_FORMAT.mimeType,
+    )
+}
+
+/**
+ * The strategy a finished join reported, or [ConcatStrategy.REENCODE] when it named none.
+ *
+ * **Looked up rather than `valueOf`, and that is a fix rather than a style choice.** `valueOf`
+ * throws `IllegalArgumentException` on a name this build does not define, and this runs inside a
+ * `viewModelScope` collect with no handler -- so the throw does not become a `Failed` state, it
+ * takes the process down.
+ *
+ * Reachable for the reason `WorkerEnumFallbackTest` and `JobTags` are both written on: WorkManager
+ * keeps finished work for about a week, so a downgrade or a rollback hands this build a job
+ * enqueued by another one. `ConcatWorker` writes `result.strategy.name` into the output `Data`, so
+ * a build that added a third strategy would leave this one crashing on its own completed joins.
+ *
+ * `ConcatWorker.kt` already made exactly this change for `KEY_FORMAT`, and says why in as many
+ * words: *"Looked up rather than `valueOf` … a format name this build does not define used to throw
+ * past the catch."* The same read on this side had not been changed with it.
+ *
+ * REENCODE is the safe default rather than an arbitrary one: it is the answer for inputs that do
+ * not match, so a job whose strategy cannot be read is described as the more conservative of the
+ * two rather than being claimed as a lossless stream copy.
+ */
+private fun strategyFrom(name: String?): ConcatStrategy =
+    ConcatStrategy.entries.firstOrNull { it.name == name } ?: ConcatStrategy.REENCODE
+
+/** A join that reported success and named no file. There is nothing to offer the user to save. */
+internal const val JOINED_WITHOUT_A_FILE_MESSAGE: String =
+    "Joining reported success but produced no file."
+
 sealed interface JoinState {
    data object Idle : JoinState
    data class Ready(val inputs: List<InputFile>) : JoinState
@@ -194,7 +298,7 @@ class JoinViewModel @JvmOverloads constructor(
    fun onInputsPicked(uris: List<Uri>) {
        val token = ownership.claim()
        if (uris.size < 2) {
-            _state.value = JoinState.Failed("Pick at least two files to join.")
+            _state.value = JoinState.Failed(ConcatWorker.TOO_FEW_INPUTS_MESSAGE)
            return
        }
        viewModelScope.launch {
@@ -250,56 +354,19 @@ class JoinViewModel @JvmOverloads constructor(
                // takes ownership of the staged file, and a superseded observation must not do
                // that either.
                if (!ownership.stillHeldBy(token)) return@collect
-                _state.value = when (info.state) {
-                    WorkInfo.State.RUNNING, WorkInfo.State.BLOCKED -> JoinState.Joining(inputs)
-                    WorkInfo.State.ENQUEUED ->
-                        if (info.runAttemptCount > 0) {
-                            JoinState.Waiting(inputs)
-                        } else {
-                            JoinState.Joining(inputs)
-                        }
-
-                    WorkInfo.State.SUCCEEDED -> {
-                        val path = info.outputData.getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH)
-                        val strategy = info.outputData.getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_STRATEGY)
-                            ?.let(ConcatStrategy::valueOf) ?: ConcatStrategy.REENCODE
-                        if (path == null) {
-                            JoinState.Failed("Joining reported success but produced no file.")
-                        } else {
-                            val staged = File(path)
-                            // Take responsibility for the file at the same moment the state
-                            // starts referring to it, so the two cannot disagree.
-                            pendingStaged = staged
-                            JoinState.Joined(
-                                staged = staged,
-                                strategy = strategy,
-                                // A join enqueued before the worker reported these carries
-                                // neither, and the fallback is the format such a job really
-                                // used -- ConcatWorker.request has always defaulted to it, and
-                                // the join screen has never offered a choice.
-                                suggestedName = info.outputData
-                                    .getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_SUGGESTED_NAME)
-                                    ?.takeIf { it.isNotBlank() }
-                                    ?: ConcatWorker.outputNameFor(ConcatWorker.DEFAULT_FORMAT),
-                                mimeType = info.outputData
-                                    .getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_MIME_TYPE)
-                                    ?.takeIf { it.isNotBlank() }
-                                    ?: ConcatWorker.DEFAULT_FORMAT.mimeType,
-                            )
-                        }
-                    }
-
-                    // A worker that dies before it can report anything leaves no output data at
-                    // all, and an exception's message can be an empty string. Both would read as
-                    // a failure with nothing said, so blank falls back like missing does.
-                    WorkInfo.State.FAILED -> JoinState.Failed(
-                        info.outputData.getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_ERROR)
-                            ?.takeIf { it.isNotBlank() }
-                            ?: "Joining failed.",
-                    )
-
-                    WorkInfo.State.CANCELLED -> cancelled
-                }
+                val next = joinStateFrom(
+                    JoinUpdate(
+                        state = info.state,
+                        runAttemptCount = info.runAttemptCount,
+                        outputData = info.outputData,
+                    ),
+                    inputs = inputs,
+                    cancelled = cancelled,
+                )
+                // Read off the result rather than assigned inside the mapping -- see the same
+                // three lines in ConversionViewModel for why that is the better half of the swap.
+                if (next is JoinState.Joined) pendingStaged = next.staged
+                _state.value = next
            }
        }
    }
@@ -346,7 +413,7 @@ class JoinViewModel @JvmOverloads constructor(
                // than leaving "Start over" -- which deletes it -- as the only thing on offer.
                // Passing `pending` rather than rebuilding it is what keeps a retry that fails
                // again on a carrying Failed instead of a bare one.
-                _state.value = JoinState.Failed(e.message ?: "Could not save the file.", pending)
+                _state.value = JoinState.Failed(e.message ?: SAVE_FAILED_MESSAGE, pending)
            }
        }
    }
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ class ConcatWorker(context: Context, params: WorkerParameters) : CoroutineWorker
        val uris = inputData.getStringArray(KEY_INPUT_URIS)?.map(Uri::parse)
            ?: return Result.failure(workDataOf(KEY_ERROR to "No input files."))
        if (uris.size < 2) {
-            return Result.failure(workDataOf(KEY_ERROR to "Pick at least two files to join."))
+            return Result.failure(workDataOf(KEY_ERROR to TOO_FEW_INPUTS_MESSAGE))
        }
        // Absent, not zero, when the picker could not size every input -- see the same read in
        // ConversionWorker and InputQuery for why the two are no longer one number.
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ class ConcatWorker(context: Context, params: WorkerParameters) : CoroutineWorker
                }
                FailureOutcome.FAIL -> {
                    Log.e(TAG, "Joining failed.", e)
-                    Result.failure(workDataOf(KEY_ERROR to (e.message ?: "Joining failed.")))
+                    Result.failure(workDataOf(KEY_ERROR to (e.message ?: GENERIC_FAILURE_MESSAGE)))
                }
            }
        }
@@ -137,6 +137,34 @@ class ConcatWorker(context: Context, params: WorkerParameters) : CoroutineWorker
    )

    companion object {
+        /**
+         * What the user is told when a join arrives with fewer than two inputs.
+         *
+         * Shared with `JoinViewModel`, which refuses the same condition one layer up so the picker
+         * can answer without enqueueing anything. Two copies of this sentence existed before, and
+         * only the one here was pinned by a test (#139) — so the wording could drift on the screen
+         * without a single test noticing, for one message the user sees from one condition.
+         *
+         * Here rather than in the ViewModel because the rule is the worker's: `request(...)` takes
+         * a `List<Uri>` and checks nothing about its length, so this is the guard that always runs.
+         */
+        const val TOO_FEW_INPUTS_MESSAGE: String = "Pick at least two files to join."
+
+        /**
+         * The last resort when a join fails and the exception says nothing.
+         *
+         * Shared with `JoinViewModel`, whose `FAILED` arm falls back to the same sentence when the
+         * output `Data` carries no error at all — a worker killed before it could write one. The two
+         * are a chain rather than a coincidence: this is what the worker puts *in* `KEY_ERROR`, and
+         * that is what the ViewModel says when `KEY_ERROR` never arrived. The user cannot tell the
+         * two apart and should not have to, so they are one sentence.
+         *
+         * The `Log.e` above deliberately keeps its own literal. A log line has a different audience
+         * and carries the exception with it; coupling it to the user-facing wording would mean
+         * rewording the screen to change a log.
+         */
+        const val GENERIC_FAILURE_MESSAGE: String = "Joining failed."
+
        const val KEY_INPUT_URIS = "input_uris"
        const val KEY_TOTAL_BYTES = "total_bytes"
        const val KEY_FORMAT = "format"
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ class ConversionWorker(context: Context, params: WorkerParameters) : CoroutineWo
            }
            FailureOutcome.FAIL -> {
                Log.e(TAG, "Conversion failed.", cause)
-                Result.failure(workDataOf(KEY_ERROR to (cause.message ?: "Conversion failed.")))
+                Result.failure(workDataOf(KEY_ERROR to (cause.message ?: GENERIC_FAILURE_MESSAGE)))
            }
        }

@@ -352,6 +352,20 @@ class ConversionWorker(context: Context, params: WorkerParameters) : CoroutineWo
    )

    companion object {
+        /**
+         * The last resort when a conversion fails and the exception says nothing.
+         *
+         * Shared with `ConversionViewModel`, whose `FAILED` arm falls back to the same sentence when
+         * the output `Data` carries no error — a worker killed before it could write one, which a
+         * refused foreground start after a process restart produces. The two are a chain rather than
+         * a coincidence: this is what goes *into* `KEY_ERROR`, and that is what is said when
+         * `KEY_ERROR` never arrived. The user cannot tell those apart and should not have to.
+         *
+         * See [ConcatWorker.GENERIC_FAILURE_MESSAGE] for the join-side twin, and the note there
+         * about why the neighbouring `Log.e` keeps its own literal.
+         */
+        const val GENERIC_FAILURE_MESSAGE: String = "Conversion failed."
+
        const val KEY_INPUT_URI = "input_uri"
        const val KEY_DISPLAY_NAME = "display_name"
        const val KEY_SIZE_BYTES = "size_bytes"
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ import org.junit.Assert.assertNull
 import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
 import org.junit.Test
 import org.libremediaconverter.model.CodecNames
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.InputProbe
 import org.libremediaconverter.model.VideoCodec

 /**
@@ -133,6 +134,38 @@ class CodecVocabularyTest {
     * landed, a device with no HEVC decoder answered true for `x265` and Media3 was handed a job it
     * could not do; now the router sends it to FFmpeg without spending the attempt.
     */
+    /**
+     * The sentinel is not just another unknown name, and the difference is the whole guard.
+     *
+     * `canDecode` ends `?: true` -- a name neither table knows keeps the permissive answer, because
+     * the app would rather try than refuse a file it might handle. `InputProbe.UNPARSEABLE` has to
+     * be the exception: the platform has *already* failed to parse the input, so there is nothing
+     * for a decoder to be permissive about, and waving it through spends a Media3 attempt on a job
+     * that cannot start.
+     *
+     * The `cinepak` line is what makes the sentinel line mean something. Without it, deleting the
+     * early return leaves this test green -- both names would fall through to the same `?: true`.
+     * The pair is the assertion.
+     *
+     * `DeviceCodecs.PERMISSIVE` carries the same rule and `ConversionRouterTest` pins its routing
+     * consequence. This is the implementation that runs on a device.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `the unparseable sentinel is refused even where an unknown name is waved through`() {
+        val everything = AndroidDeviceCodecs.forTesting(
+            encoders = emptySet(),
+            decoders = setOf("video/avc", "video/hevc"),
+        )
+        assertFalse(
+            "the platform could not parse this input, so there is nothing to decode with",
+            everything.canDecode(InputProbe.UNPARSEABLE),
+        )
+        assertTrue(
+            "a merely unknown name still keeps the permissive answer",
+            everything.canDecode("cinepak"),
+        )
+    }
+
    @Test
    fun `a device without the decoder now says so for the aliases it used to wave through`() {
        val hevcOnly = AndroidDeviceCodecs.forTesting(encoders = emptySet(), decoders = setOf("video/hevc"))
@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.convert
+
+import android.net.Uri
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.Data
+import androidx.work.WorkInfo
+import androidx.work.workDataOf
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.OutputFormat
+import org.libremediaconverter.work.ConversionWorker
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+
+/**
+ * Every answer [conversionStateFrom] can give, chosen rather than stumbled into.
+ *
+ * ## What this revises
+ *
+ * The mapping is not cold code and never was: `ConversionViewModel$observe$1$1` reported 28 covered
+ * lines before this file existed, because every test that drives a real worker runs it. What no
+ * test did was **choose which arm it took**. A real worker reaches a terminal state with
+ * well-formed output, so `SUCCEEDED`-with-a-path and `FAILED`-with-a-message were the only arms any
+ * test had ever produced — the other six ran never.
+ *
+ * A `grep` for `WorkInfo.State.` across the JVM suite makes that look untrue: all six constants are
+ * there. They are in `ReattachmentTest`, driven into **`Reattachment.choose`** — a different
+ * function that encodes the same enqueued-means-retry rule. So that rule had a test in one of its
+ * two homes, and the copy the user's screen reads had none.
+ *
+ * ## Why the seam, and why these assertions
+ *
+ * `WorkManager.getInstance` is called in the ViewModel's constructor and `observe` is private, so
+ * nothing could hand this a chosen `WorkInfo`. Cutting the `when` out as a pure function over
+ * [ConversionUpdate] is the answer #141 took for `MediaProbe`, and `JobSnapshot` beside
+ * `Reattachment.choose` is the same shape again.
+ *
+ * The assertions are on the whole state, not on its type. `Converting(input, 40)` and
+ * `Converting(input, 0)` are both `Converting`, and a mapping that dropped the progress read would
+ * pass any test that only asked which class came back.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class ConversionStateMappingTest {
+
+    // --- running ------------------------------------------------------------
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a running job reports the progress it published`() {
+        // The percent is read from `progress`, not from `outputData`, and not from the settings.
+        // A mapping that returned Converting(input, 0) for every RUNNING would leave the bar
+        // pinned at zero for the whole conversion.
+        val state = map(WorkInfo.State.RUNNING, progress = 40)
+
+        assertEquals(ConversionState.Converting(INPUT, 40), state)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a running job with no published progress reports zero rather than failing`() {
+        // getInt's default. A worker that has started but not yet called setProgress is ordinary,
+        // and must not read as an error.
+        val state = map(WorkInfo.State.RUNNING, progress = null)
+
+        assertEquals(ConversionState.Converting(INPUT, 0), state)
+    }
+
+    // --- enqueued: the rule that had a test only in its other home ----------
+
+    @Test
+    fun `an enqueued job that has already run is waiting to retry`() {
+        val state = map(WorkInfo.State.ENQUEUED, runAttemptCount = 1)
+
+        assertEquals(
+            "an ENQUEUED after a run is a pending retry, which the user is told about",
+            ConversionState.Waiting(INPUT),
+            state,
+        )
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `an enqueued job that has never run is simply starting`() {
+        // The other side, and the reason the test above is not enough on its own: a mapping that
+        // ignored runAttemptCount and always answered Waiting would pass that one and fail this.
+        val state = map(WorkInfo.State.ENQUEUED, runAttemptCount = 0)
+
+        assertEquals(ConversionState.Converting(INPUT, 0), state)
+    }
+
+    // --- succeeded ----------------------------------------------------------
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a success that named no file is a failure, not an empty success`() {
+        // The job said it finished and named nothing. There is no file to offer, so `Converted`
+        // would put a Save button over a path that does not exist.
+        val state = map(WorkInfo.State.SUCCEEDED, data = Data.EMPTY)
+
+        assertEquals(ConversionState.Failed(SUCCEEDED_WITHOUT_A_FILE_MESSAGE), state)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a success carries the worker's own name and type, not the current settings`() {
+        val state = map(
+            WorkInfo.State.SUCCEEDED,
+            data = workDataOf(
+                ConversionWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH to "/cache/conversions/out.mkv",
+                ConversionWorker.KEY_SUGGESTED_NAME to "holiday.mkv",
+                ConversionWorker.KEY_MIME_TYPE to "video/x-matroska",
+                ConversionWorker.KEY_ENGINE_USED to "FFMPEG",
+                ConversionWorker.KEY_ROUTE_REASON to "container needs FFmpeg",
+            ),
+        )
+
+        val converted = state as ConversionState.Converted
+        assertEquals("holiday.mkv", converted.suggestedName)
+        assertEquals("video/x-matroska", converted.mimeType)
+        assertEquals("FFMPEG", converted.engineUsed)
+        assertEquals("container needs FFmpeg", converted.routeReason)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a success from older work falls back to the current settings for name and type`() {
+        // WorkManager keeps finished work about a week, so a job enqueued before the worker
+        // reported these is ordinary for a few days rather than a corner case.
+        val state = map(
+            WorkInfo.State.SUCCEEDED,
+            data = workDataOf(ConversionWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH to "/cache/conversions/out.mp4"),
+        )
+
+        val converted = state as ConversionState.Converted
+        assertEquals(FALLBACK_SPEC.mimeType, converted.mimeType)
+        assertEquals(
+            ConversionWorker.outputNameFor(INPUT.displayName, FALLBACK_SPEC),
+            converted.suggestedName,
+        )
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a blank name or type falls back the same way a missing one does`() {
+        // A blank string is not an answer. Without takeIf, the save dialog opens named "" and
+        // registered for a MIME type of "", which no provider will accept.
+        val state = map(
+            WorkInfo.State.SUCCEEDED,
+            data = workDataOf(
+                ConversionWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH to "/cache/conversions/out.mp4",
+                ConversionWorker.KEY_SUGGESTED_NAME to "",
+                ConversionWorker.KEY_MIME_TYPE to "   ",
+            ),
+        )
+
+        val converted = state as ConversionState.Converted
+        assertEquals(FALLBACK_SPEC.mimeType, converted.mimeType)
+        assertEquals(
+            ConversionWorker.outputNameFor(INPUT.displayName, FALLBACK_SPEC),
+            converted.suggestedName,
+        )
+    }
+
+    // --- failed -------------------------------------------------------------
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a failure carries the reason the worker gave`() {
+        val state = map(
+            WorkInfo.State.FAILED,
+            data = workDataOf(ConversionWorker.KEY_ERROR to "Not enough free space to convert."),
+        )
+
+        assertEquals(ConversionState.Failed("Not enough free space to convert."), state)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a failure with nothing said still says something`() {
+        // A worker killed before it could write output data leaves none at all -- a refused
+        // foreground start after a process restart is one way. Failed("") would render as a blank
+        // error card.
+        val state = map(WorkInfo.State.FAILED, data = Data.EMPTY)
+
+        assertEquals(ConversionState.Failed(ConversionWorker.GENERIC_FAILURE_MESSAGE), state)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a failure whose message is blank falls back like a missing one`() {
+        val state = map(
+            WorkInfo.State.FAILED,
+            data = workDataOf(ConversionWorker.KEY_ERROR to "   "),
+        )
+
+        assertEquals(ConversionState.Failed(ConversionWorker.GENERIC_FAILURE_MESSAGE), state)
+    }
+
+    // --- cancelled and blocked ---------------------------------------------
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a cancellation lands wherever the caller said it should`() {
+        // Not a fixed state: a conversion started here goes back to Ready with the picked file,
+        // while one picked up by reattach goes to Idle, because the URI that job holds belongs to
+        // a process that no longer exists. `observe`'s KDoc is where that distinction is set.
+        val toReady = map(WorkInfo.State.CANCELLED, cancelled = ConversionState.Ready(INPUT))
+        val toIdle = map(WorkInfo.State.CANCELLED, cancelled = ConversionState.Idle)
+
+        assertEquals(ConversionState.Ready(INPUT), toReady)
+        assertEquals(ConversionState.Idle, toIdle)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a blocked job looks like one that is starting`() {
+        // BLOCKED is a job waiting on a prerequisite. There is nothing useful to say about it that
+        // differs from "starting", and inventing a state for it would put a word on screen the
+        // user cannot act on.
+        val state = map(WorkInfo.State.BLOCKED)
+
+        assertEquals(ConversionState.Converting(INPUT, 0), state)
+    }
+
+    private fun map(
+        state: WorkInfo.State,
+        progress: Int? = null,
+        runAttemptCount: Int = 0,
+        data: Data = Data.EMPTY,
+        cancelled: ConversionState = ConversionState.Ready(INPUT),
+    ): ConversionState = conversionStateFrom(
+        ConversionUpdate(
+            state = state,
+            // Modelled on the call site, which reads `getInt(KEY_PROGRESS, 0)` -- so "no progress
+            // published" is the default reaching the mapping, not a null it has to handle.
+            progressPercent = progress ?: 0,
+            runAttemptCount = runAttemptCount,
+            outputData = data,
+        ),
+        input = INPUT,
+        cancelled = cancelled,
+        fallbackSpec = FALLBACK_SPEC,
+    )
+
+    private companion object {
+        val INPUT = InputFile(Uri.parse("content://test/holiday.mov"), "holiday.mov", 4096L)
+        val FALLBACK_SPEC = OutputFormat.MP4_H265.spec
+    }
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.convert
+
+import android.net.Uri
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import kotlinx.coroutines.runBlocking
+import kotlinx.coroutines.withTimeout
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertFalse
+import org.junit.Assert.assertNotEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertNull
+import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.AudioCodec
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.AudioPlan
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.Container
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConversionRequest
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.CopyPlanner
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.InputProbe
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.OutputSpec
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.VideoCodec
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.VideoPlan
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+import java.io.File
+import java.util.concurrent.CancellationException
+
+/**
+ * A job that reached Media3 with a container Media3 cannot mux.
+ *
+ * [Media3Muxers]' own KDoc names the defect this guards: *"the router claimed five containers while
+ * the engine silently wrote MP4 for all of them."* `factoryFor` answers null for fourteen of the
+ * app's containers, and `buildTransformer` turns that null into a failed job rather than letting
+ * `Transformer` fall back to its default muxer.
+ *
+ * The guard had never fired. `Media3Engine$buildTransformer$3` -- the `requireNotNull` message
+ * lambda -- was four lines and four branches at 0%, which is to say the entire repair for a defect
+ * the codebase went to the trouble of writing down was untested. Weakening it would restore that
+ * bug silently, because the wrong output is a *playable file with the wrong container*, not a crash.
+ *
+ * Same harness and same two disciplines as [Media3EngineEmptyCompositionTest]: assert the plan
+ * really is the one the test needs before driving the engine, and rule out
+ * `CancellationException` so an unresumed continuation cannot read as a pass.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class Media3MuxerGuardTest {
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a container Media3 cannot mux fails the job rather than silently writing MP4`() {
+        val context = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+        val engine = Media3Engine(context)
+        val request = ConversionRequest(
+            spec = OutputSpec(Container.WEBM, VideoCodec.VP9, AudioCodec.OPUS),
+            probe = InputProbe(videoCodec = "h264", audioCodec = "aac", container = Container.MP4),
+        )
+
+        // The premise, asserted rather than assumed -- three separate ways this test could pass
+        // over a path it never entered.
+        val plan = CopyPlanner.plan(request.spec, request.probe)
+        assertEquals("the plan has to still be WebM by the time the engine sees it", Container.WEBM, plan.container)
+        assertNull("...and Media3 really has no muxer for it", Media3Muxers.factoryFor(plan.container))
+        // Not the empty-composition refusal, which fires earlier and is a different test's subject.
+        assertNotEquals(VideoPlan.Drop, plan.video)
+        assertNotEquals(AudioPlan.Drop, plan.audio)
+
+        val failure = try {
+            runCatching {
+                runBlocking {
+                    withTimeout(TIMEOUT_MS) {
+                        engine.transcode(Uri.parse("file:///dev/null"), File(context.cacheDir, "guard.webm"), request) {
+                        }
+                    }
+                }
+            }.exceptionOrNull()
+        } finally {
+            engine.close()
+        }
+
+        assertFalse(
+            "the continuation was never resumed -- the refusal escaped instead of failing the job: $failure",
+            failure is CancellationException,
+        )
+        // Type *and* message, and the message half is the load-bearing one. Replacing the
+        // requireNotNull with a fallback factory does not make the export succeed here: it lets it
+        // run on and fail some other way, which a bare type assertion would happily accept.
+        assertTrue("expected the muxer guard to refuse the job, got $failure", failure is IllegalArgumentException)
+        assertTrue(
+            "the refusal has to name the container it could not mux, got: ${failure?.message}",
+            failure?.message.orEmpty().contains("cannot mux") &&
+                failure?.message.orEmpty().contains(Container.WEBM.name),
+        )
+    }
+
+    private companion object {
+        /** Nothing is decoded or muxed on this path -- the guard refuses before any of that. */
+        const val TIMEOUT_MS = 10_000L
+    }
+}
@@ -232,6 +232,12 @@ class OutputPublisherPublishTest {
            RowShape.NO_SIZE_COLUMN to "a cursor with no SIZE column",
            RowShape.NULL_SIZE to "a cursor whose SIZE cell is null",
            RowShape.NO_ROWS to "a cursor holding no rows",
+            // The third case the KDoc names -- "a resolver call that throws" -- and the one the
+            // list was missing. It reaches `?: false` through `runCatching` rather than through a
+            // cursor answer, so it is the only one of the four that proves the catch is load
+            // bearing: a provider that revokes its grant between the picker and the write must not
+            // have its document deleted on the way out.
+            RowShape.QUERY_THROWS to "a provider that throws out of query",
        ).forEach { (shape, description) ->
            FakeSafProvider.deleteRequests.clear()
            FakeSafProvider.backingFile(documentUri).writeBytes(ByteArray(0))
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.convert
+
+import android.app.Application
+import android.net.Uri
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.Data
+import androidx.work.workDataOf
+import org.junit.After
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertNotEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
+import org.junit.Before
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.join.JoinState
+import org.libremediaconverter.join.JoinViewModel
+import org.libremediaconverter.join.joinActions
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.AudioCodec
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.Container
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.EnginePreference
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.OutputFormat
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.QualityTier
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.VideoCodec
+import org.libremediaconverter.work.ConcatWorker
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+
+/**
+ * That each affordance is wired to the ViewModel method it is named after.
+ *
+ * ## What this covers that no other test can
+ *
+ * `ConverterScreenContentTest`, `ConverterStateAffordancesTest` and `JoinScreenContentTest` all
+ * drive the **stateless** content composables, which build their own `ConverterActions`. So the
+ * wiring — the list of `viewModel::` references the stateful outer hands down — was seen by nothing
+ * in the suite.
+ *
+ * ## The hazard is narrower than "seventeen bindings", and this says so
+ *
+ * #156 was filed claiming a transposition of any two bindings would survive the suite. That is not
+ * true, and it was worth checking rather than testing on the assumption:
+ *
+ * | swap | result |
+ * |---|---|
+ * | `onVideoCodec` ↔ `onAudioCodec` | **rejected by the compiler** |
+ * | `onCancel` ↔ `onReset` | **compiles** |
+ *
+ * Every typed binding — container, both codecs, preset, suggestion, quality, engine preference —
+ * takes a distinct parameter type, so the compiler is already the test. Writing assertions for
+ * those would be theatre.
+ *
+ * **The `() -> Unit` bindings are the real gap**, because they are interchangeable to the compiler:
+ * two on the converter screen (`onCancel`, `onReset`) and three on the join screen (`onJoin`,
+ * `onCancel`, `onReset`). A Cancel that discards the finished file, or a Join that cancels, is a
+ * one-character mistake that ships.
+ *
+ * ## How they are told apart
+ *
+ * By effect, not by a recording double. `reset()` sets the state to `Idle`; `cancel()` with no
+ * active job leaves it alone (`ConversionViewModel.cancel` is `activeWorkId?.let(...)`, and
+ * `SettingsEditsTest` pins that). Driving each from a non-`Idle` state is therefore enough to say
+ * which one ran.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class ScreenWiringTest {
+
+    private lateinit var app: Application
+
+    @Before
+    fun setUp() {
+        app = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+        ConversionDependencies.publisher = { RecordingPublisher(app) }
+        ConversionDependencies.probe = { _, _ -> org.libremediaconverter.model.InputProbe() }
+    }
+
+    @After
+    fun tearDown() {
+        ConversionDependencies.reset()
+    }
+
+    // --- the converter screen ----------------------------------------------
+
+    @Test
+    fun `Start over resets, and Cancel does not`() {
+        // The transposition that compiles. If onReset were bound to cancel, this stays on Ready.
+        installTestWorkManager(app, Data.EMPTY)
+        val pick = ParkedPickDispatcher()
+        val viewModel = ConversionViewModel(app, pickDispatcher = pick)
+        val actions = converterActions(viewModel, onPickInput = {}, onConvert = {}, onSave = {})
+        viewModel.onInputPicked(INPUT_URI)
+        pick.runAll()
+        assertNotEquals(
+            "the fixture needs a non-Idle state or neither action is observable",
+            ConversionState.Idle,
+            viewModel.state.value,
+        )
+
+        actions.onReset()
+
+        assertEquals(ConversionState.Idle, viewModel.state.value)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `Cancel leaves the picked file on screen`() {
+        // The other half. Without it, a wiring with BOTH actions bound to reset passes the test
+        // above -- and that is exactly what a copy-paste of the wrong line produces.
+        installTestWorkManager(app, Data.EMPTY)
+        val pick = ParkedPickDispatcher()
+        val viewModel = ConversionViewModel(app, pickDispatcher = pick)
+        val actions = converterActions(viewModel, onPickInput = {}, onConvert = {}, onSave = {})
+        viewModel.onInputPicked(INPUT_URI)
+        pick.runAll()
+        val before = viewModel.state.value
+
+        actions.onCancel()
+
+        assertEquals(
+            "Cancel must not throw away the pick the way Start over does",
+            before,
+            viewModel.state.value,
+        )
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `each settings affordance reaches the setting it is named after`() {
+        // The typed bindings. The compiler already rejects a transposition among these, so this is
+        // not that assertion -- it is the cheaper one that each is bound to *something*, and that a
+        // binding dropped to `{}` during an edit would be caught.
+        installTestWorkManager(app, Data.EMPTY)
+        val pick = ParkedPickDispatcher()
+        val viewModel = ConversionViewModel(app, pickDispatcher = pick)
+        val actions = converterActions(viewModel, onPickInput = {}, onConvert = {}, onSave = {})
+
+        actions.onPreset(OutputFormat.WEBM_VP9)
+        assertEquals(OutputFormat.WEBM_VP9.spec, viewModel.settings.value.spec)
+
+        actions.onContainer(Container.MKV)
+        assertEquals(Container.MKV, viewModel.settings.value.spec.container)
+
+        actions.onVideoCodec(VideoCodec.H264)
+        assertEquals(VideoCodec.H264, viewModel.settings.value.spec.videoCodec)
+
+        actions.onAudioCodec(AudioCodec.FLAC)
+        assertEquals(AudioCodec.FLAC, viewModel.settings.value.spec.audioCodec)
+
+        actions.onQuality(QualityTier.BEST)
+        assertEquals(QualityTier.BEST, viewModel.settings.value.quality)
+
+        actions.onEnginePreference(EnginePreference.FORCE_SOFTWARE)
+        assertEquals(EnginePreference.FORCE_SOFTWARE, viewModel.settings.value.enginePreference)
+
+        actions.onSuggestion(OutputFormat.MP4_H264.spec)
+        assertEquals(OutputFormat.MP4_H264.spec, viewModel.settings.value.spec)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `the launcher-backed actions are the ones the screen supplies`() {
+        // Not wired to the ViewModel at all, deliberately -- they need an ActivityResultLauncher.
+        // Asserted so that a later edit routing one of them at the ViewModel is noticed.
+        installTestWorkManager(app, Data.EMPTY)
+        val pick = ParkedPickDispatcher()
+        val viewModel = ConversionViewModel(app, pickDispatcher = pick)
+        val called = mutableListOf<String>()
+        val actions = converterActions(
+            viewModel,
+            onPickInput = { called += "pick" },
+            onConvert = { called += "convert" },
+            onSave = { called += "save:$it" },
+        )
+
+        actions.onPickInput()
+        actions.onConvert()
+        actions.onSave("holiday.mp4")
+
+        assertEquals(listOf("pick", "convert", "save:holiday.mp4"), called)
+    }
+
+    // --- the join screen, where three are interchangeable -------------------
+
+    @Test
+    fun `Start over resets the join, and Cancel does not`() {
+        installTestWorkManager(app, workDataOf(ConcatWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH to "/dev/null"))
+        val pick = ParkedPickDispatcher()
+        val viewModel = JoinViewModel(app, pickDispatcher = pick)
+        val actions = joinActions(viewModel, onPickInputs = {}, onSave = {})
+        viewModel.onInputsPicked(TWO_INPUTS)
+        pick.runAll()
+        assertTrue(
+            "the fixture needs a non-Idle state: ${viewModel.state.value}",
+            viewModel.state.value !is JoinState.Idle,
+        )
+
+        actions.onReset()
+
+        assertEquals(JoinState.Idle, viewModel.state.value)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `Cancel leaves the picked files on screen`() {
+        installTestWorkManager(app, workDataOf(ConcatWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH to "/dev/null"))
+        val pick = ParkedPickDispatcher()
+        val viewModel = JoinViewModel(app, pickDispatcher = pick)
+        val actions = joinActions(viewModel, onPickInputs = {}, onSave = {})
+        viewModel.onInputsPicked(TWO_INPUTS)
+        pick.runAll()
+        val before = viewModel.state.value
+
+        actions.onCancel()
+
+        assertEquals(before, viewModel.state.value)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `Join starts the job rather than cancelling or resetting it`() {
+        // The third of the join screen's interchangeable trio, and the one whose transposition is
+        // worst: a Join button bound to cancel does nothing at all, which reads as a dead button.
+        installTestWorkManager(app, workDataOf(ConcatWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH to "/dev/null"))
+        val pick = ParkedPickDispatcher()
+        val viewModel = JoinViewModel(app, pickDispatcher = pick)
+        val actions = joinActions(viewModel, onPickInputs = {}, onSave = {})
+        viewModel.onInputsPicked(TWO_INPUTS)
+        pick.runAll()
+
+        actions.onJoin()
+
+        assertTrue(
+            "Join must leave Ready for a running state, not sit still and not go Idle: " +
+                "${viewModel.state.value}",
+            viewModel.state.value is JoinState.Joining || viewModel.state.value is JoinState.Joined,
+        )
+    }
+
+    private companion object {
+        val INPUT_URI: Uri = Uri.parse("content://test/holiday.mov")
+        val TWO_INPUTS = listOf(
+            Uri.parse("content://test/a.mp4"),
+            Uri.parse("content://test/b.mp4"),
+        )
+    }
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.convert
+
+import android.app.Application
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.Data
+import org.junit.After
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertNotEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertNull
+import org.junit.Before
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.AudioCodec
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.Container
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.EnginePreference
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.OutputFormat
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.QualityTier
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.VideoCodec
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+
+/**
+ * The seven one-line edits the settings sheet makes, and what each one leaves alone.
+ *
+ * ## Why these needed a file of their own
+ *
+ * `setPreset` was covered. The six beside it — `setContainer`, `setVideoCodec`, `setAudioCodec`,
+ * `applySuggestion`, `setQuality`, `setEnginePreference` — and `cancel()` had **no coverage at
+ * all**, which is the tell: they are reachable from the JVM suite by exactly the route `setPreset`
+ * already takes, and nothing had asked.
+ *
+ * ## What is actually being asserted
+ *
+ * Not "the setter sets something". Each of these copies into a nested `OutputSpec`, so the failure
+ * worth catching is **a setter that writes the right value into the wrong field, or that rebuilds
+ * the spec and silently discards the other two**. So every test here asserts the field it changed
+ * *and* that the rest of the spec survived — a `setContainer` implemented as
+ * `it.copy(spec = OutputFormat.MP4_H265.spec.copy(container = container))` would pass a test that
+ * only checked the container.
+ *
+ * `ConverterScreenContentTest` cannot cover this: it builds `ConverterActions` itself and never
+ * touches the ViewModel. That the *screen* calls these is #156's, and neither implies the other.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class SettingsEditsTest {
+
+    private lateinit var app: Application
+    private lateinit var viewModel: ConversionViewModel
+
+    @Before
+    fun setUp() {
+        app = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+        installTestWorkManager(app, Data.EMPTY)
+        viewModel = ConversionViewModel(app)
+    }
+
+    @After
+    fun tearDown() {
+        ConversionDependencies.reset()
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `choosing a preset replaces the whole spec`() {
+        viewModel.setPreset(OutputFormat.WEBM_VP9)
+
+        assertEquals(OutputFormat.WEBM_VP9.spec, viewModel.settings.value.spec)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `changing the container leaves both codecs alone`() {
+        // Moved off the default spec first, and that is load-bearing rather than tidiness. The
+        // default IS `OutputFormat.MP4_H265.spec`, so a `setContainer` that rebuilt the spec from
+        // that preset instead of from the current one produced an identical answer and the
+        // mutation went green. Editing the codecs away from the default first is what makes
+        // "the other two survived" an assertion rather than a coincidence.
+        viewModel.setPreset(OutputFormat.WEBM_VP9)
+        val before = viewModel.settings.value.spec
+
+        viewModel.setContainer(Container.MKV)
+
+        val after = viewModel.settings.value.spec
+        assertEquals(Container.MKV, after.container)
+        assertEquals("the video codec is not the container's to change", before.videoCodec, after.videoCodec)
+        assertEquals("the audio codec is not the container's to change", before.audioCodec, after.audioCodec)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `changing the video codec leaves the container and the audio codec alone`() {
+        // The transposition this guards against is real: setVideoCodec and setAudioCodec take
+        // different enum types, but a copy(...) naming the wrong field compiles wherever the types
+        // happen to line up, and the picker would silently set the other one.
+        val before = viewModel.settings.value.spec
+
+        viewModel.setVideoCodec(VideoCodec.VP9)
+
+        val after = viewModel.settings.value.spec
+        assertEquals(VideoCodec.VP9, after.videoCodec)
+        assertEquals(before.container, after.container)
+        assertEquals(before.audioCodec, after.audioCodec)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `changing the audio codec leaves the container and the video codec alone`() {
+        val before = viewModel.settings.value.spec
+
+        viewModel.setAudioCodec(AudioCodec.OPUS)
+
+        val after = viewModel.settings.value.spec
+        assertEquals(AudioCodec.OPUS, after.audioCodec)
+        assertEquals(before.container, after.container)
+        assertEquals(before.videoCodec, after.videoCodec)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `applying a suggestion replaces the spec without disturbing quality or engine`() {
+        // A suggestion comes from ContainerCapabilities when the current spec is invalid, so it is
+        // a whole spec by construction. What it must not do is reset the two settings beside it.
+        viewModel.setQuality(QualityTier.BEST)
+        viewModel.setEnginePreference(EnginePreference.FORCE_SOFTWARE)
+
+        viewModel.applySuggestion(OutputFormat.MKV_H264.spec)
+
+        val settings = viewModel.settings.value
+        assertEquals(OutputFormat.MKV_H264.spec, settings.spec)
+        assertEquals(QualityTier.BEST, settings.quality)
+        assertEquals(EnginePreference.FORCE_SOFTWARE, settings.enginePreference)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `changing the quality leaves the spec and the engine preference alone`() {
+        // Both neighbours are moved off their defaults first. Asserting against AUTO -- which is
+        // what `ConversionSettings` starts with -- let a `setQuality` that also reset the engine
+        // preference to AUTO pass, because the reset and the survival looked identical.
+        viewModel.setPreset(OutputFormat.WEBM_VP9)
+        viewModel.setEnginePreference(EnginePreference.FORCE_SOFTWARE)
+        val before = viewModel.settings.value.spec
+
+        viewModel.setQuality(QualityTier.BEST)
+
+        val settings = viewModel.settings.value
+        assertEquals(QualityTier.BEST, settings.quality)
+        assertEquals(before, settings.spec)
+        assertEquals(
+            "quality is not the engine preference's to change",
+            EnginePreference.FORCE_SOFTWARE,
+            settings.enginePreference,
+        )
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `changing the engine preference leaves the spec and the quality alone`() {
+        // Off the defaults for the same reason as the test above: QualityTier.FAST is the starting
+        // value, so asserting it here would have been satisfied by a reset as readily as by a
+        // survival.
+        viewModel.setPreset(OutputFormat.WEBM_VP9)
+        viewModel.setQuality(QualityTier.BEST)
+        val before = viewModel.settings.value.spec
+
+        viewModel.setEnginePreference(EnginePreference.FORCE_SOFTWARE)
+
+        val settings = viewModel.settings.value
+        assertEquals(EnginePreference.FORCE_SOFTWARE, settings.enginePreference)
+        assertEquals(before, settings.spec)
+        assertEquals(
+            "the engine preference is not the quality's to change",
+            QualityTier.BEST,
+            settings.quality,
+        )
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `editing past every preset leaves no matching preset`() {
+        // `matchingPreset` is what the settings sheet reads to decide whether to show a preset as
+        // selected or to say "Custom". Editing one field of a preset must drop it out of the list
+        // rather than leaving the old one highlighted.
+        viewModel.setPreset(OutputFormat.MP4_H265)
+        assertEquals(OutputFormat.MP4_H265, viewModel.settings.value.matchingPreset)
+
+        viewModel.setAudioCodec(AudioCodec.FLAC)
+
+        assertNull(
+            "an edited spec is no longer any preset, and the sheet says Custom",
+            viewModel.settings.value.matchingPreset,
+        )
+        assertNotEquals(OutputFormat.MP4_H265.spec, viewModel.settings.value.spec)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `cancelling with no active job does nothing rather than throwing`() {
+        // `activeWorkId?.let(...)` -- the null side. A user can reach Cancel through a state that
+        // has already finished, and taking the app down for it would be worse than doing nothing.
+        viewModel.cancel()
+
+        assertEquals(ConversionState.Idle, viewModel.state.value)
+    }
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.convert
+
+import android.net.Uri
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertNull
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConcatPlanner
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConcatStrategy
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+
+/**
+ * A clip in a join that nothing could read, from the probe all the way to the strategy.
+ *
+ * Both halves of this are covered already, and separately: `MediaProbeTrackWalkTest` pins what
+ * `concatInputFrom` makes of a track list, and `ConcatPlannerTest`'s
+ * `an unknown codec is not treated as a match` pins what the planner does with a hand-built
+ * `ConcatInput(video = null)`. **Nothing spanned the two**, and the span is the load-bearing part:
+ * the planner's safety rests on the probe really producing that shape, and the hand-built fixture
+ * would go on passing if it stopped.
+ *
+ * Measured rather than asserted: mutating `concatInputFrom`'s initial `video` to a non-null
+ * placeholder leaves `ConcatPlannerTest` green and turns this red.
+ *
+ * ## The asymmetry this protects
+ *
+ * `ConcatPlanner` guards its video check against a null codec (`ConcatStrategy.kt:51`) and its
+ * audio check not at all (`:54`). **That is correct, not an oversight.** `MediaProbe.shortName`
+ * returns a non-null `String`, so in `concatInputFrom` a null `audioCodec` means the track is
+ * *absent* — and two clips with no audio genuinely do match. A null `videoCodec` carries both
+ * meanings, absent or unreadable, which is why only that one is guarded.
+ *
+ * So the audio check is safe *because* the video guard fires first on a clip nothing could read.
+ * Nothing wrote that coupling down and nothing held it.
+ *
+ * ## What this deliberately does not cover
+ *
+ * `probeForConcat`'s `catch` arm (`MediaProbe.kt:300-302`). It is **not reachable on the JVM**:
+ * Robolectric's `MediaExtractor` never throws from `setDataSource`, measured across an
+ * unregistered `content://` authority, a missing `file://`, a file of garbage bytes and an `http://`
+ * URL — all four returned normally with `trackCount = 0`. So the failure arrives here as an empty
+ * track list rather than as an exception, which reaches the same `ConcatInput(null, null, 0, 0, 0)`
+ * by the other road. The catch stays device-only, and this file does not pretend otherwise.
+ */
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class UnreadableJoinInputTest {
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a clip nothing could read probes as unknown, and an unknown clip is re-encoded`() {
+        val unreadable = MediaProbe.probeForConcat(RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication(), UNREADABLE)
+
+        assertNull("an unreadable clip proves nothing about its video codec", unreadable.videoCodec)
+        assertNull("nor about its audio codec", unreadable.audioCodec)
+        assertEquals("nor about its dimensions", 0, unreadable.width)
+        assertEquals(0, unreadable.height)
+        assertEquals(0, unreadable.frameRate)
+
+        assertEquals(
+            "a clip nothing could read is not evidence of a match with anything",
+            ConcatStrategy.REENCODE,
+            ConcatPlanner.plan(listOf(unreadable, unreadable)),
+        )
+    }
+
+    private companion object {
+        /** `content://` so the probe takes the SAF branch a real pick takes. Nothing answers it. */
+        val UNREADABLE: Uri = Uri.parse("content://test/vanished.mp4")
+    }
+}
@@ -166,6 +166,30 @@ class FFmpegCommandBuilderTest {
        assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.OPUS), "-c:a", "libopus")
    }

+    /**
+     * The arm most conversions actually take, and the only one in `audioArgs` with no test.
+     *
+     * `flac wav and opus select the right encoders` above covers the three named arms; MP3 has its
+     * own. AAC arrives through the `else`, so nothing named it and nothing pinned either half of
+     * what it emits -- neither `aac` nor `192k` appeared anywhere in this file. Both are shipped
+     * defaults: MP4 and M4A are the formats the picker offers first, so this is the audio
+     * every ordinary conversion gets.
+     *
+     * The bitrate is asserted as well as the encoder because it is the half a refactor is likelier
+     * to lose. An `-b:a` that quietly changed would not fail anything, would not look wrong in a
+     * command line, and would show up only as files that sound different from the ones the app
+     * produced last month.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `aac is the default encoder, at the bitrate the app ships`() {
+        assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.MP4_H264), "-c:a", "aac")
+        assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.MP4_H264), "-b:a", "192k")
+        // Through the `else` rather than through a named arm, so an AAC branch added above it later
+        // has to keep answering the same way.
+        assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.M4A_AAC), "-c:a", "aac")
+        assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.M4A_AAC), "-b:a", "192k")
+    }
+
    @Test
    fun `audio only formats never carry a video encoder`() {
        listOf(OutputFormat.MP3, OutputFormat.FLAC, OutputFormat.WAV, OutputFormat.OPUS)
@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.join
+
+import android.net.Uri
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.Data
+import androidx.work.WorkInfo
+import androidx.work.workDataOf
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.InputFile
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConcatStrategy
+import org.libremediaconverter.work.ConcatWorker
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+
+/**
+ * Every answer [joinStateFrom] can give, chosen rather than stumbled into.
+ *
+ * The join-side twin of `ConversionStateMappingTest`, and the argument is the same one: the mapping
+ * ran on every test that drove a real `ConcatWorker`, but a real worker only ever reaches a terminal
+ * state with well-formed output, so five arms had never been *chosen* by anything.
+ *
+ * ## The one that is not just coverage
+ *
+ * `an unknown strategy name is read as a re-encode rather than thrown` covers a real defect this
+ * seam exposed. The line it replaces was:
+ *
+ * ```kotlin
+ * .getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_STRATEGY)?.let(ConcatStrategy::valueOf) ?: ConcatStrategy.REENCODE
+ * ```
+ *
+ * `valueOf` throws on a name this build does not define, and this runs inside a `viewModelScope`
+ * collect with no handler — so it does not become a `Failed` state, it takes the process down.
+ * `ConcatWorker.kt` had already made this exact change for `KEY_FORMAT` and written down why; the
+ * matching read on this side had not been changed with it.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class JoinStateMappingTest {
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a running join is joining`() {
+        assertEquals(JoinState.Joining(INPUTS), map(WorkInfo.State.RUNNING))
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a blocked join looks like one that is starting`() {
+        // Folded into the RUNNING arm deliberately: a job waiting on a prerequisite is nothing the
+        // user can act on, and a separate word for it would be noise.
+        assertEquals(JoinState.Joining(INPUTS), map(WorkInfo.State.BLOCKED))
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `an enqueued join that has already run is waiting to retry`() {
+        assertEquals(JoinState.Waiting(INPUTS), map(WorkInfo.State.ENQUEUED, runAttemptCount = 1))
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `an enqueued join that has never run is simply starting`() {
+        // The other side. Without it, a mapping that ignored runAttemptCount passes the test above.
+        assertEquals(JoinState.Joining(INPUTS), map(WorkInfo.State.ENQUEUED, runAttemptCount = 0))
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a success that named no file is a failure, not an empty success`() {
+        assertEquals(
+            JoinState.Failed(JOINED_WITHOUT_A_FILE_MESSAGE),
+            map(WorkInfo.State.SUCCEEDED, data = Data.EMPTY),
+        )
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a success carries the strategy the worker actually used`() {
+        // Not cosmetic: the join screen tells the user whether their files were stream-copied or
+        // re-encoded, which is the difference between lossless and lossy.
+        val joined = map(
+            WorkInfo.State.SUCCEEDED,
+            data = workDataOf(
+                ConcatWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH to "/cache/conversions/joined.mp4",
+                ConcatWorker.KEY_STRATEGY to ConcatStrategy.STREAM_COPY.name,
+            ),
+        ) as JoinState.Joined
+
+        assertEquals(ConcatStrategy.STREAM_COPY, joined.strategy)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `an unknown strategy name is read as a re-encode rather than thrown`() {
+        // The defect. A build that added a third strategy leaves finished joins in the queue naming
+        // it, and WorkManager keeps those about a week -- the premise WorkerEnumFallbackTest and
+        // JobTags are both written on. With `valueOf` this throws IllegalArgumentException inside a
+        // viewModelScope collect that has no handler, so it is not a Failed state, it is a crash.
+        //
+        // REENCODE rather than STREAM_COPY because it is the conservative answer: describing an
+        // unknown join as lossless would be a claim the app cannot support.
+        val joined = map(
+            WorkInfo.State.SUCCEEDED,
+            data = workDataOf(
+                ConcatWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH to "/cache/conversions/joined.mp4",
+                ConcatWorker.KEY_STRATEGY to "SMART_CONCAT_V2",
+            ),
+        ) as JoinState.Joined
+
+        assertEquals(ConcatStrategy.REENCODE, joined.strategy)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a success with no strategy at all falls back the same way`() {
+        val joined = map(
+            WorkInfo.State.SUCCEEDED,
+            data = workDataOf(ConcatWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH to "/cache/conversions/joined.mp4"),
+        ) as JoinState.Joined
+
+        assertEquals(ConcatStrategy.REENCODE, joined.strategy)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a success from older work falls back to the format such a job really used`() {
+        val joined = map(
+            WorkInfo.State.SUCCEEDED,
+            data = workDataOf(ConcatWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH to "/cache/conversions/joined.mp4"),
+        ) as JoinState.Joined
+
+        assertEquals(ConcatWorker.outputNameFor(ConcatWorker.DEFAULT_FORMAT), joined.suggestedName)
+        assertEquals(ConcatWorker.DEFAULT_FORMAT.mimeType, joined.mimeType)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a blank name or type falls back the same way a missing one does`() {
+        val joined = map(
+            WorkInfo.State.SUCCEEDED,
+            data = workDataOf(
+                ConcatWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH to "/cache/conversions/joined.mp4",
+                ConcatWorker.KEY_SUGGESTED_NAME to "",
+                ConcatWorker.KEY_MIME_TYPE to "  ",
+            ),
+        ) as JoinState.Joined
+
+        assertEquals(ConcatWorker.outputNameFor(ConcatWorker.DEFAULT_FORMAT), joined.suggestedName)
+        assertEquals(ConcatWorker.DEFAULT_FORMAT.mimeType, joined.mimeType)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a failure carries the reason the worker gave`() {
+        assertEquals(
+            JoinState.Failed("Not enough free space to join these files."),
+            map(
+                WorkInfo.State.FAILED,
+                data = workDataOf(
+                    ConcatWorker.KEY_ERROR to "Not enough free space to join these files.",
+                ),
+            ),
+        )
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a failure with nothing said still says something`() {
+        assertEquals(
+            JoinState.Failed(ConcatWorker.GENERIC_FAILURE_MESSAGE),
+            map(WorkInfo.State.FAILED, data = Data.EMPTY),
+        )
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a failure whose message is blank falls back like a missing one`() {
+        assertEquals(
+            JoinState.Failed(ConcatWorker.GENERIC_FAILURE_MESSAGE),
+            map(WorkInfo.State.FAILED, data = workDataOf(ConcatWorker.KEY_ERROR to " ")),
+        )
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a cancellation lands wherever the caller said it should`() {
+        // A join started here goes back to Ready with the picked files; one picked up by reattach
+        // goes to Idle, because those URIs belong to a process that no longer exists.
+        assertEquals(
+            JoinState.Ready(INPUTS),
+            map(WorkInfo.State.CANCELLED, cancelled = JoinState.Ready(INPUTS)),
+        )
+        assertEquals(JoinState.Idle, map(WorkInfo.State.CANCELLED, cancelled = JoinState.Idle))
+    }
+
+    private fun map(
+        state: WorkInfo.State,
+        runAttemptCount: Int = 0,
+        data: Data = Data.EMPTY,
+        cancelled: JoinState = JoinState.Ready(INPUTS),
+    ): JoinState = joinStateFrom(
+        JoinUpdate(state = state, runAttemptCount = runAttemptCount, outputData = data),
+        inputs = INPUTS,
+        cancelled = cancelled,
+    )
+
+    private companion object {
+        val INPUTS = listOf(
+            InputFile(Uri.parse("content://test/a.mp4"), "a.mp4", 1024L),
+            InputFile(Uri.parse("content://test/b.mp4"), "b.mp4", 2048L),
+        )
+    }
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.join
+
+import android.app.Application
+import android.net.Uri
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.ListenableWorker
+import androidx.work.testing.TestListenableWorkerBuilder
+import androidx.work.workDataOf
+import kotlinx.coroutines.runBlocking
+import org.junit.After
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Before
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConversionDependencies
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.RecordingPublisher
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.installTestWorkManager
+import org.libremediaconverter.work.ConcatWorker
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+
+/**
+ * The two layers that refuse a short join, refusing it with one sentence.
+ *
+ * ## Why this is not "assert a constant equals itself"
+ *
+ * `ConcatWorker` and `JoinViewModel` both reject a join of fewer than two files, and before #158
+ * each carried **its own copy of the literal**. Only the worker's was pinned — by `RefusedJobTest`,
+ * added in #139 — so the wording on the screen could drift away from the wording in the job with no
+ * test saying anything, for one message the user sees from one condition.
+ *
+ * Sharing a constant makes them agree by construction. What it does *not* do is prove that both
+ * layers still reach it: a refactor that stops `JoinViewModel` refusing at all, or that gives it a
+ * different message, passes any test that only reads `TOO_FEW_INPUTS_MESSAGE`. So each layer is
+ * driven for real here — the ViewModel through `onInputsPicked`, the worker through `doWork` — and
+ * the assertion is that the two answers are **the same string**, taken from two running layers
+ * rather than from one declaration.
+ *
+ * That is the shape `CLAUDE.md` asks for: revert the sharing and this goes red, because the two
+ * sites drift the moment they are allowed to.
+ *
+ * ## Scope
+ *
+ * The arity guard's own behaviour on the ViewModel side — that it refuses one file, that it accepts
+ * two, that it claims ownership first — is #155's, and this deliberately does not duplicate it.
+ * This file is about the *agreement between layers*, which is what #158 changed.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class SharedFailureMessagesTest {
+
+    private lateinit var app: Application
+    private lateinit var viewModel: JoinViewModel
+
+    @Before
+    fun setUp() {
+        app = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+        ConversionDependencies.publisher = { RecordingPublisher(app) }
+        installTestWorkManager(app, workDataOf(ConcatWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH to "/dev/null"))
+        viewModel = JoinViewModel(app)
+    }
+
+    @After
+    fun tearDown() {
+        ConversionDependencies.reset()
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `both layers refuse a one-file join with the same sentence`() {
+        // The ViewModel, refusing before anything is enqueued.
+        viewModel.onInputsPicked(listOf(ONE_FILE))
+        val fromScreen = (viewModel.state.value as JoinState.Failed).message
+
+        // The worker, refusing a job that reached the queue anyway -- which it can, because
+        // ConcatWorker.request(...) takes a List<Uri> and checks nothing about its length.
+        val result = runBlocking { worker(ONE_FILE).doWork() }
+        val fromJob = (result as ListenableWorker.Result.Failure)
+            .outputData.getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_ERROR)
+
+        assertEquals(
+            "the screen and the job must say the same thing about the same refusal",
+            fromScreen,
+            fromJob,
+        )
+        // And that the shared sentence is the one either layer would have written on its own,
+        // rather than both having drifted together to something else.
+        assertEquals(ConcatWorker.TOO_FEW_INPUTS_MESSAGE, fromScreen)
+    }
+
+    private fun worker(vararg inputs: Uri): ConcatWorker = TestListenableWorkerBuilder<ConcatWorker>(
+        context = app,
+        inputData = workDataOf(
+            ConcatWorker.KEY_INPUT_URIS to inputs.map(Uri::toString).toTypedArray(),
+            ConcatWorker.KEY_TOTAL_BYTES to 1024L,
+        ),
+        runAttemptCount = 0,
+    ).build()
+
+    private companion object {
+        val ONE_FILE: Uri = Uri.parse("content://test/holiday.mp4")
+    }
+}
@@ -451,6 +451,99 @@ class ContainerCapabilitiesTest {
        }
    }

+    /**
+     * The video twin of `no audio track is accepted by every container in both modes`.
+     *
+     * Dead in production today, and deliberately so: every caller guards `NONE` before asking the
+     * matrix, so nothing reaches this arm through the app. **The asymmetry is the argument, not the
+     * reachability** -- its audio counterpart at the top of the same `when` has had a dedicated
+     * test since #136, and one of a matched pair being covered is how a later reader concludes the
+     * other was considered and exempted. It was not; it was simply missed.
+     *
+     * Not the same shape as the two `COPY -> error(...)` arms, which `docs/coverage-read-findings.md`
+     * records as a named exemption (F4). Those are guards that must not be provokable. This is a
+     * documented answer -- "no video track fits anywhere" -- and an answer is a thing to pin.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `no video track is accepted by every container in both modes`() {
+        Container.entries.forEach { container ->
+            listOf(CodecMode.COPY, CodecMode.ENCODE).forEach { mode ->
+                assertTrue(
+                    "$container should accept no video track ($mode)",
+                    ContainerCapabilities.accepts(container, VideoCodec.NONE, mode),
+                )
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * A suggestion that keeps the codec the user asked for, rather than falling back to the
+     * container's first encodable one.
+     *
+     * `repairVideo`'s third arm -- "the request is not a copy, and this container can encode it" --
+     * is the one that preserves intent, and it was the only arm of the four nothing reached. The
+     * property test above executes `repairVideo` on every case it walks and lands elsewhere each
+     * time: an explicit COPY that works, a source the container can carry untouched, or no video
+     * track at all.
+     *
+     * The route is indirect because it is the only one the app has. VP9 into WebM is a perfectly
+     * good video request; what makes it invalid is the *audio* -- WebM carries Opus and Vorbis, not
+     * AAC. So `validateAudio` refuses, `suggestions` looks for a container that can hold what was
+     * asked for, and MP4 can encode VP9. The suggestion has to come back carrying VP9: swapping to
+     * the container's first encodable codec would discard the choice the user made.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `a repaired suggestion keeps the video codec the user chose`() {
+        val invalid = ContainerCapabilities.validate(
+            OutputSpec(Container.WEBM, VideoCodec.VP9, AudioCodec.AAC),
+            h264Source,
+        )
+
+        assertTrue("WebM cannot hold AAC, so this spec is invalid", invalid is Validation.Invalid)
+        val suggestions = (invalid as Validation.Invalid).suggestions
+        assertTrue(
+            "expected a suggestion that still encodes VP9, got $suggestions",
+            suggestions.any { it.videoCodec == VideoCodec.VP9 },
+        )
+        assertEverySuggestionValid(invalid, h264Source)
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The fallback in `firstContainerHolding`: when the input's own container cannot hold the
+     * codec the user asked for, any container that can will do.
+     *
+     * The preferred half -- "the container the input already uses" -- is what every other case
+     * reaches, because they all start from a file whose own container carries the codec in
+     * question. The elvis after it had never run.
+     *
+     * AVI is the input that makes it run: AVI predates H.265 and has no mapping for it, so asking
+     * an AVI for H.265 is refused, and the container the input already uses cannot be part of the
+     * answer. Without the fallback the only candidates left are AVI itself and the container
+     * holding the *source* codec -- also AVI -- so the refusal still offers something, but what it
+     * offers is H.264: the app quietly declines the codec the user asked for instead of moving them
+     * to a container that supports it.
+     *
+     * That is why this asserts the codec survives rather than that the list is non-empty. A
+     * non-empty assertion passes with the fallback deleted -- measured, not assumed.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `an input whose container cannot hold the requested codec is moved, not downgraded`() {
+        val aviSource = InputProbe(videoCodec = "h264", audioCodec = "aac", container = Container.AVI)
+
+        val invalid = ContainerCapabilities.validate(
+            OutputSpec(Container.AVI, VideoCodec.H265, AudioCodec.AAC),
+            aviSource,
+        )
+
+        assertTrue("AVI has no mapping for H.265", invalid is Validation.Invalid)
+        val suggestions = (invalid as Validation.Invalid).suggestions
+        assertTrue(
+            "expected a container that can actually hold H.265, got $suggestions",
+            suggestions.any { it.videoCodec == VideoCodec.H265 },
+        )
+        assertEverySuggestionValid(invalid, aviSource)
+    }
+
    @Test
    fun `resolving audio COPY before asking the matrix is required`() {
        // The audio twin of `resolving COPY before asking the matrix is required`, and the reason is
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.work
+
+import android.content.pm.ServiceInfo
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.annotation.Config
+
+/**
+ * [ConversionForegroundType.current] answers differently on each of the three API regimes, and
+ * until this file only one of them was ever executed.
+ *
+ * `app/src/test/resources/robolectric.properties` pins the whole JVM suite to `sdk=36`, so every
+ * Robolectric test that reaches a `ForegroundInfo` takes the `mediaProcessing` arm and no other.
+ * The 33 and 34 arms were cold: 3 lines and 3 of 4 branches, measured on `main` at `d354f64`.
+ *
+ * **The instrumented test is not a substitute, and the reason is specific.**
+ * `ConversionWorkerTest.foregroundTypeMatchesTheRunningApiLevel` asserts against whichever API the
+ * leg happens to be — one arm per leg, never the other two — and the legs that would cover 33 and
+ * 34 are the ones issue #122 wedges. `docs/coverage-read-findings.md` records an API 33 run that
+ * reported `received: 60` and `failed: unknown`: the regime *was* exercised, and that leg could
+ * not have said so if it had broken. Four `@Config` classes here pin all three arms
+ * deterministically, in the same `./gradlew` invocation as everything else.
+ *
+ * `minSdk` is 33, so none of these is dead code — each is a device someone is running the app on.
+ *
+ * **SDK 35 is in the list for the boundary, not for the answer.** It shares its answer with 36,
+ * which would make it look redundant. It is not: relaxing `>= VANILLA_ICE_CREAM` to `>` is invisible
+ * at every level except exactly 35, so without this class that mutation survives the suite.
+ */
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+@Config(sdk = [33])
+class ForegroundTypeApi33Test {
+
+    /**
+     * Zero rather than a named constant because there is no constant to name: API 33 does not
+     * require a type, and `mediaProcessing` does not exist here to pass. `ForegroundInfo` reads 0
+     * as "no type at all", which is what this regime wants.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `api 33 asks for no foreground service type`() {
+        assertEquals(0, ConversionForegroundType.current())
+    }
+}
+
+/**
+ * API 34 makes a type mandatory and still has no `mediaProcessing`, so `dataSync` is the only
+ * sensible fit. See [ForegroundTypeApi33Test] for why this file exists.
+ */
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+@Config(sdk = [34])
+class ForegroundTypeApi34Test {
+
+    @Test
+    fun `api 34 falls back to dataSync, the only type that fits`() {
+        assertEquals(ServiceInfo.FOREGROUND_SERVICE_TYPE_DATA_SYNC, ConversionForegroundType.current())
+    }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The first level with `mediaProcessing`, and therefore the one that tells `>=` from `>`.
+ * See [ForegroundTypeApi33Test].
+ */
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+@Config(sdk = [35])
+class ForegroundTypeApi35Test {
+
+    @Test
+    fun `api 35 is the first level that takes mediaProcessing`() {
+        assertEquals(ServiceInfo.FOREGROUND_SERVICE_TYPE_MEDIA_PROCESSING, ConversionForegroundType.current())
+    }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The level the rest of the suite runs at, asserted here rather than assumed — it is the one arm
+ * that was already covered, and leaving it out would make this file look like it is about the old
+ * levels rather than about all three regimes. See [ForegroundTypeApi33Test].
+ */
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+@Config(sdk = [36])
+class ForegroundTypeApi36Test {
+
+    @Test
+    fun `api 36 keeps mediaProcessing`() {
+        assertEquals(ServiceInfo.FOREGROUND_SERVICE_TYPE_MEDIA_PROCESSING, ConversionForegroundType.current())
+    }
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.work
+
+import android.app.Application
+import android.net.Uri
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.Data
+import androidx.work.ListenableWorker
+import androidx.work.testing.TestListenableWorkerBuilder
+import kotlinx.coroutines.CancellationException
+import kotlinx.coroutines.runBlocking
+import org.junit.After
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertFalse
+import org.junit.Assert.assertThrows
+import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
+import org.junit.Before
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConversionDependencies
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.HardwareTranscoder
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.SoftwareTranscoder
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.installTestWorkManager
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.Container
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConversionRequest
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.DeviceCodecs
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.EnginePreference
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.InputProbe
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.OutputFormat
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+import java.io.File
+import java.util.UUID
+
+/**
+ * What happens when the hardware engine does not finish the job.
+ *
+ * `runMedia3OrFallBack` was eleven lines at 0% on the JVM and `isCancellation` had never been
+ * called by any unit test at all. Its own KDoc calls the fallback the protection against vendor
+ * hardware encoders that "cannot be tested for correctness", so it is the branch most likely to
+ * matter on a device nobody here owns — and it was reachable the whole time through
+ * `ConversionDependencies.hardware`, which no unit test had ever used.
+ *
+ * The sharp one is cancellation. `runMedia3OrFallBack` catches `Throwable`, so without the
+ * `isCancellation` re-throw a user cancelling a hardware transcode would have the app quietly
+ * start a *second* conversion in software — the one thing cancelling is supposed to prevent.
+ *
+ * `ForcedFailureTest` covers the failure half on a device. It does not cover the cancellation half,
+ * and this host cannot run it either way.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class HardwareFallbackTest {
+
+    private lateinit var app: Application
+    private lateinit var hardware: RecordingHardwareTranscoder
+    private lateinit var software: RecordingSoftwareTranscoder
+
+    @Before
+    fun setUp() {
+        app = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+        hardware = RecordingHardwareTranscoder()
+        software = RecordingSoftwareTranscoder()
+        ConversionDependencies.publisher = { AlwaysRoomPublisher(app) }
+        ConversionDependencies.hardware = { hardware }
+        ConversionDependencies.software = { software }
+        // A probe with real codecs, not the default: `InputProbe()` reports UNPARSEABLE, which
+        // PERMISSIVE.canDecode refuses, and the router would send every job here straight to
+        // FFmpeg without any of these tests mentioning why.
+        ConversionDependencies.probe = { _, _ -> H264_SOURCE }
+        ConversionDependencies.deviceCodecs = { DeviceCodecs.PERMISSIVE }
+        installTestWorkManager(app, Data.EMPTY)
+    }
+
+    @After
+    fun tearDown() {
+        ConversionDependencies.reset()
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a hardware failure runs the job again in software, on a clean staging file`() {
+        hardware.failWith = { error("the vendor encoder produced nothing usable") }
+
+        val result = runBlocking { worker().doWork() }
+
+        assertTrue("the job should still succeed, got $result", result is ListenableWorker.Result.Success)
+        assertEquals("the hardware engine gets exactly one attempt", 1, hardware.attempts)
+        assertEquals("and the job then goes to software", 1, software.attempts)
+        // The `staged.delete()` between the two, asserted where it is observable: FFmpeg must not
+        // find a half-written hardware output sitting at the path it is about to write.
+        assertFalse(
+            "the partial hardware output must be gone before FFmpeg starts",
+            software.outputExistedOnEntry,
+        )
+        assertEquals("the hardware engine is closed either way", 1, hardware.closes)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a cancelled hardware transcode is not quietly retried in software`() {
+        hardware.failWith = { throw CancellationException("the user pressed Cancel") }
+
+        assertThrows(CancellationException::class.java) { runBlocking { worker().doWork() } }
+
+        assertEquals("the hardware engine ran", 1, hardware.attempts)
+        assertEquals(
+            "cancelling must not start a second conversion -- that is the whole point of cancelling",
+            0,
+            software.attempts,
+        )
+        assertEquals("and the engine is still closed on the way out", 1, hardware.closes)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a hardware transcode that works never reaches the software engine`() {
+        val result = runBlocking { worker().doWork() }
+
+        assertTrue("got $result", result is ListenableWorker.Result.Success)
+        assertEquals(1, hardware.attempts)
+        assertEquals("the fallback is a fallback, not a second pass", 0, software.attempts)
+        assertEquals(1, hardware.closes)
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * #169: the display-name fallback, which reaches further than the notification title.
+     *
+     * `inputData.getString(KEY_DISPLAY_NAME) ?: "input"` had never taken its right-hand side. The
+     * value is not only the foreground notification's title: it feeds `outputNameFor`, so it is
+     * also the filename offered in the user's save dialog. A job enqueued by an older build, or
+     * built by hand, carries no such key.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `a job that names no input file still suggests an output name`() {
+        val result = runBlocking { worker(displayName = null).doWork() }
+
+        assertTrue("got $result", result is ListenableWorker.Result.Success)
+        val suggested = (result as ListenableWorker.Result.Success)
+            .outputData.getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_SUGGESTED_NAME)
+        assertTrue(
+            "expected a name built from the fallback, got $suggested",
+            suggested.orEmpty().startsWith("input"),
+        )
+    }
+
+    private fun worker(displayName: String? = DISPLAY_NAME): ConversionWorker {
+        val spec = OutputFormat.MP4_H265.spec
+        val entries = buildMap<String, Any> {
+            put(ConversionWorker.KEY_INPUT_URI, INPUT.toString())
+            displayName?.let { put(ConversionWorker.KEY_DISPLAY_NAME, it) }
+            put(ConversionWorker.KEY_SIZE_BYTES, INPUT_BYTES)
+            put(ConversionWorker.KEY_CONTAINER, spec.container.name)
+            put(ConversionWorker.KEY_VIDEO_CODEC, spec.videoCodec.name)
+            put(ConversionWorker.KEY_AUDIO_CODEC, spec.audioCodec.name)
+            // AUTO rather than FORCE_SOFTWARE, which is what every other worker test uses and is
+            // exactly why this path had no coverage: forcing software never enters the function.
+            put(ConversionWorker.KEY_ENGINE_PREFERENCE, EnginePreference.AUTO.name)
+        }
+        return TestListenableWorkerBuilder<ConversionWorker>(
+            context = app,
+            inputData = Data.Builder().putAll(entries).build(),
+            runAttemptCount = 0,
+        ).setId(JOB_ID).build()
+    }
+
+    private companion object {
+        val INPUT: Uri = Uri.parse("file:///tmp/holiday.mp4")
+        const val DISPLAY_NAME = "holiday.mp4"
+        const val INPUT_BYTES = 1024L
+        val JOB_ID: UUID = UUID.fromString("00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000009")
+        val H264_SOURCE = InputProbe(
+            videoCodec = "h264",
+            audioCodec = "aac",
+            container = Container.MP4,
+            durationMs = 1_000,
+        )
+    }
+}
+
+/**
+ * A hardware engine that writes something before it fails, and remembers being closed.
+ *
+ * Writing first is the point, exactly as it is for `PartialThenFailingTranscoder`: an engine that
+ * only threw would let a missing `staged.delete()` pass unnoticed.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+private class RecordingHardwareTranscoder : HardwareTranscoder {
+
+    var attempts = 0
+    var closes = 0
+    var failWith: (() -> Unit)? = null
+
+    override suspend fun transcode(input: Uri, output: File, request: ConversionRequest, onProgress: (Int) -> Unit) {
+        attempts++
+        output.writeBytes(ByteArray(PARTIAL_BYTES))
+        failWith?.invoke()
+    }
+
+    override fun close() {
+        closes++
+    }
+
+    private companion object {
+        const val PARTIAL_BYTES = 2048
+    }
+}
+
+/** The software engine, recording whether the hardware attempt's leftovers were cleared first. */
+private class RecordingSoftwareTranscoder : SoftwareTranscoder {
+
+    var attempts = 0
+    var outputExistedOnEntry = false
+
+    override suspend fun run(
+        request: ConversionRequest,
+        inputPath: String,
+        output: File,
+        durationMs: Long,
+        onProgress: (Int) -> Unit,
+    ) {
+        attempts++
+        outputExistedOnEntry = output.exists()
+        output.writeBytes(ByteArray(OUTPUT_BYTES))
+    }
+
+    private companion object {
+        const val OUTPUT_BYTES = 512
+    }
+}
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ import androidx.work.testing.WorkManagerTestInitHelper
 import androidx.work.workDataOf
 import kotlinx.coroutines.runBlocking
 import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertFalse
 import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
 import org.junit.Before
 import org.junit.Test
@@ -125,6 +126,39 @@ class JobSnapshotsTest {
        assertEquals(newer.absolutePath, Reattachment.choose(snapshots)?.job?.outputPath)
    }

+    /**
+     * A job in the tag query that never recorded an output path at all.
+     *
+     * Distinct from the three cases above, which all *have* a path and differ in what it names. A
+     * job still running, or one that finished without writing its result key, carries no path at
+     * all -- and `getWorkInfosByTagFlow` returns it alongside the finished ones, because the tag is
+     * the worker class and every attempt ever enqueued carries it.
+     *
+     * The guard is the `?.` in `path?.let(::File)`. Without it the null goes straight into a `File`
+     * constructor. What this pins is the consequence rather than the null check: such a job must
+     * not be offered as a result, so `Reattachment.choose` has to walk past it to the job that
+     * really produced a file. Choosing it would put a Converted screen in front of the user with a
+     * Save button that has nothing to save.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `a job that recorded no output path is not offered as a result`() {
+        val real = stagedFile("real.mp4", bytes = 4096)
+        finishedWithOutput(real)
+        finishedWithNoOutput()
+
+        val snapshots = snapshots()
+
+        assertEquals("both jobs carry the tag, so both come back", 2, snapshots.size)
+        val silent = snapshots.single { it.outputPath == null }
+        assertFalse("no path means no output, not an empty one", silent.outputExists)
+        assertEquals("and no time either, for the same reason", 0L, silent.outputModifiedAt)
+        assertEquals(
+            "the reattachment has to walk past it to the job that really produced a file",
+            real.absolutePath,
+            Reattachment.choose(snapshots)?.job?.outputPath,
+        )
+    }
+
    private fun snapshots(): List<JobSnapshot> = runBlocking {
        workManager.jobSnapshots(
            tag = ConversionWorker::class.java.name,
@@ -152,6 +186,11 @@ class JobSnapshotsTest {
        ).result.get()
    }

+    /** A job that carries the tag and no result key -- still running, or finished without one. */
+    private fun finishedWithNoOutput() {
+        workManager.enqueue(OneTimeWorkRequestBuilder<ConversionWorker>().build()).result.get()
+    }
+
    private companion object {
        /** Two fixed moments a day apart, so the ordering is stated rather than raced for. */
        const val OLDER_MS = 1_700_000_000_000L
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.work
+
+import android.app.Notification
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.Data
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertNotEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
+import org.junit.Before
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.installTestWorkManager
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+import java.util.UUID
+
+/**
+ * The two things a progress notification can say, and that they are not the same thing.
+ *
+ * An assertion gap rather than a coverage one, and the distinction is the reason this file exists.
+ * JaCoCo is green on `build`'s `if (indeterminate)`, because `ProgressNotificationTest` drives it
+ * through a real worker -- but that test reads only the notification id and
+ * `Notification.EXTRA_PROGRESS`. **Nothing had ever read the text.** Swapping the two branches, or
+ * collapsing them into one string, passed the entire suite.
+ *
+ * What it costs to get wrong is small and constant: a conversion that has been running for four
+ * minutes still saying "Preparing", or one that has not started reporting yet claiming 0%. Neither
+ * is a crash, and neither would be found by anything else here -- which is exactly the kind of
+ * thing that survives for a long time.
+ *
+ * Nothing else in the suite constructs [ConversionNotifications] directly.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class NotificationProgressTextTest {
+
+    /**
+     * `build` reaches `WorkManager.getInstance` for the Cancel action's PendingIntent, so the
+     * notification cannot be built at all without one. That coupling is why nothing had ever
+     * constructed this class directly and read what it produced.
+     */
+    @Before
+    fun setUp() {
+        installTestWorkManager(RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication(), Data.EMPTY)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `an indeterminate notification says something different from a measured one`() {
+        val context = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+        val notifications = ConversionNotifications(context)
+
+        val preparing = notifications.build(JOB_ID, TITLE, percent = 0, indeterminate = true).text()
+        val measured = notifications.build(JOB_ID, TITLE, percent = 42, indeterminate = false).text()
+
+        assertNotEquals(
+            "the two states have to read differently, or the text says nothing at all",
+            preparing,
+            measured,
+        )
+        assertTrue(
+            "a measured notification has to carry its percentage, got \"$measured\"",
+            measured.contains("42"),
+        )
+        assertTrue(
+            "an indeterminate one must not invent one, got \"$preparing\"",
+            !preparing.contains("42") && !preparing.contains("0"),
+        )
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The title is the caller's, not the builder's -- it is the file the user picked, and it is what
+     * tells two simultaneous conversions apart in the shade.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `the notification is titled with the file it is converting`() {
+        val context = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+
+        val built = ConversionNotifications(context).build(JOB_ID, TITLE, percent = 10)
+
+        assertEquals(TITLE, built.extras.getString(Notification.EXTRA_TITLE))
+    }
+
+    private fun Notification.text(): String = extras.getString(Notification.EXTRA_TEXT).orEmpty()
+
+    private companion object {
+        const val TITLE = "holiday.mp4"
+        val JOB_ID: UUID = UUID.fromString("00000000-0000-4000-8000-00000000000a")
+    }
+}
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ class RefusedJobTest {

        assertEquals(
            ListenableWorker.Result.failure(
-                workDataOf(ConcatWorker.KEY_ERROR to "Pick at least two files to join."),
+                workDataOf(ConcatWorker.KEY_ERROR to ConcatWorker.TOO_FEW_INPUTS_MESSAGE),
            ),
            result,
        )