Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into m-117b-tmp

Say in the run-shape table when the wedge timeout was what killed the leg

.github/scripts/e2e-report-shape.sh

@@ -30,16 +30,31 @@
 #
 # Usage:
 #   e2e-report-shape.sh <label> <gradle-log> [<baseline-file>]
+#   E2E_WEDGED_AFTER=<seconds>   the wrapper timeout killed gradle after that many seconds
 #
 # With a third argument the run is compared against the baseline in that file (advisory mode)
 # and a `::notice::` is emitted per deviation. NEVER `::error::`: the advisory job is
 # `continue-on-error: true` and stays that way, and an error annotation would be a new way for
 # a diagnostic to change a conclusion.
+#
+# WHY THE WEDGE ARRIVES AS AN ENV VAR (#118) rather than being read out of the log like every
+# other field: there is nothing in the log to read. A wedge is gradle never returning, so gradle
+# never printed a verdict, never printed a truncation line, and never aborted instrumentation --
+# the log of a wedged leg is the log of a run that simply stops. Measured on job 98035980326:
+# `expected: 59`, `received: 59`, `completed cleanly: yes`, six seconds before the wedge warning,
+# for a leg that the timeout had killed 22 minutes in. Only e2e-run.sh knows, because only it
+# saw `timeout` exit 124, so it says so. Guessing it from a log that ends abruptly would call
+# every cancelled run a wedge.
+#
+# It is read as a STRING and only ever interpolated into one. `[ -n ... ]`, never `-gt`: it
+# crosses a process boundary from a shell that deliberately sets it EMPTY on every non-wedge
+# path, and an arithmetic test on an empty string is the header's rule four paragraphs up.
 set -uo pipefail
 
 LABEL="${1:-unknown}"
 LOG="${2:-}"
 BASELINE_FILE="${3:-}"
+WEDGED_AFTER="${E2E_WEDGED_AFTER:-}"
 
 SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd -- "$(dirname -- "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
 REPO_ROOT="$(cd -- "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && pwd)"
@@ -115,6 +130,13 @@ elif [ -n "$abort_received" ]; then
 elif [ -n "$expected" ] && [ -z "$abort_line" ]; then
   received="$expected"
   received_src="the run was not truncated, so every expected test reported"
+  # ... unless it was killed, in which case "not truncated" is only "gradle never got as far as
+  # saying so". This is the branch the wedged leg in #118 took -- with no XML written yet, the
+  # number is what the runner was TOLD to run, and the source line said the opposite in the same
+  # table that called the leg clean. The number is deliberately left alone: it is still the best
+  # available answer, and only the claim about where it came from was wrong.
+  [ -n "$WEDGED_AFTER" ] \
+    && received_src="no test XML was written and gradle never printed a truncation line — but the leg was killed mid-run, so this is what it was told to run, not what reported"
 fi
 
 failed="unknown"
@@ -152,6 +174,12 @@ elif [ "$no_run" = "nothing" ]; then
   # "cleanly" would be a lie about a run that left no evidence it happened.
   completed="unknown"
   completed_src="no runner output to read"
+elif [ -n "$WEDGED_AFTER" ]; then
+  # The wedge is checked LAST of the four, so it only ever overrides the `yes`. The two "no"s
+  # above are already right and name the abort, which the wedge row does not; `unknown` is
+  # already right too. A wedge on top of an abort is both facts, and both get printed.
+  completed="**no**"
+  completed_src="the wrapper timeout killed gradle after ${WEDGED_AFTER}s — instrumentation itself was never aborted, which is why nothing in the log says so"
 else
   completed="yes"
   completed_src="no truncation line and no \`INSTRUMENTATION_ABORTED\`"
@@ -217,6 +245,11 @@ echo "----- RUN SHAPE (api${LABEL}) -----"
 echo "  expected:          $expected"
 echo "  received:          $received"
 echo "  failed:            $failed"
+# Above `completed cleanly`, because it is the line that says what happened to the leg and the
+# other one only qualifies it. A reader who stops after three rows still sees it.
+if [ -n "$WEDGED_AFTER" ]; then
+  echo "  wedged:            yes -- gradle was killed after ${WEDGED_AFTER}s and never returned"
+fi
 echo "  completed cleanly: ${completed//\*/}"
 if [ -n "$abort_received" ]; then
   echo "  received before the abort: $abort_received"
@@ -249,6 +282,9 @@ if [ -n "${GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY:-}" ]; then
     echo "| expected | $expected | $expected_src |"
     echo "| received | $received | $received_src |"
     echo "| failed | $failed | $failed_src |"
+    if [ -n "$WEDGED_AFTER" ]; then
+      echo "| wedged | **yes** | \`timeout\` fired after ${WEDGED_AFTER}s and killed gradle (exit 124), which is what e2e-run.sh then captured the wedge diagnostics for |"
+    fi
     echo "| completed cleanly | $completed | $completed_src |"
     if [ -n "$abort_received" ]; then
       echo "| received before the abort | $abort_received | the same line — the XML above counts the truncated test as a failure, this number does not |"

.github/scripts/e2e-run.sh

@@ -239,20 +239,34 @@ timeout -k 30s "$WEDGE_TIMEOUT" \
   ${E2E_EXTRA_GRADLE_ARGS:-} 2>&1 | tee "$GRADLE_LOG" || status=$?
 echo "::endgroup::"
 
+# Whether the wrapper timeout fired, decided ONCE. 124 is `timeout` saying it killed the
+# command, and two places downstream need that fact: capture_wedge below, and the report, which
+# otherwise calls a killed leg `completed cleanly: yes` (#118). Deriving it twice is how those
+# two would drift apart -- the report would keep printing after someone changed what a wedge
+# means here. It stays a string: empty on every other path, so those legs pass an empty
+# E2E_WEDGED_AFTER and the report behaves exactly as before.
+wedged=""
+[ "$status" -eq 124 ] && wedged="$WEDGE_TIMEOUT"
+
 # The run-shape report: expected/received/failed and whether the run finished, every time,
 # green or red. It never changes `status` -- it is a diagnostic, and the header's rule about
 # diagnostics applies to it as much as to every probe below.
 #
+# E2E_WEDGED_AFTER is the wedge, told to the report rather than left for it to infer. It cannot
+# be inferred: a wedge is gradle never returning, so gradle printed no verdict at all, and the
+# log the report reads looks like a run that simply stopped. Only this script knows the
+# difference, because only this script saw the exit status.
+#
 # The baseline argument, and only it, turns on the comparison, and only the advisory API 37 job
 # passes E2E_ADVISORY=1. Comparing on the gating legs would announce a deviation on all five of
 # them every run, since they run the whole suite rather than the marked three. They still get
 # the report: a truncated run reporting fewer results than it ran is what #108 looks like, and
 # `completed cleanly` is the field that shows it.
 if [ "${E2E_ADVISORY:-}" = "1" ]; then
-  bash "$SCRIPT_DIR/e2e-report-shape.sh" "$LABEL" "$GRADLE_LOG" \
+  E2E_WEDGED_AFTER="$wedged" bash "$SCRIPT_DIR/e2e-report-shape.sh" "$LABEL" "$GRADLE_LOG" \
     "$REPO_ROOT/app/src/androidTest/java/org/libremediaconverter/FailsOnEmulatorApi37.kt" || true
 else
-  bash "$SCRIPT_DIR/e2e-report-shape.sh" "$LABEL" "$GRADLE_LOG" || true
+  E2E_WEDGED_AFTER="$wedged" bash "$SCRIPT_DIR/e2e-report-shape.sh" "$LABEL" "$GRADLE_LOG" || true
 fi
 
 if [ "$status" -eq 0 ]; then
@@ -260,7 +274,7 @@ if [ "$status" -eq 0 ]; then
   exit 0
 fi
 
-if [ "$status" -eq 124 ]; then
+if [ -n "$wedged" ]; then
   capture_wedge "api${LABEL}"
 else
   echo "::error::E2E api${LABEL} failed (exit $status)"

CLAUDE.md

@@ -98,6 +98,13 @@ days. Read it as the current answer, and see the git history if you need the old
   is written anyway and says nothing about it — `.github/scripts/e2e-report-shape.sh` is where that
   is measured and explained.
 
+  Every leg prints that table, advisory or not, and **on the wedge path it also carries a `wedged:`
+  row** (#118). `completed cleanly` only ever meant "instrumentation was not aborted", which stays
+  true of a leg the `WEDGE_TIMEOUT` killed 22 minutes in — so without that row the table read
+  `received: 59, completed cleanly: yes` for a leg that had just died. The wedge is passed to the
+  report as `E2E_WEDGED_AFTER` by `e2e-run.sh`, which is the only thing that can know it: a wedge
+  is gradle never returning, so the log it left says nothing about it.
+
 Still true, and the reason the advisory job is not simply deleted: **API 37 needs a manual check on
 the Pixel 10 Pro XL before each release.** Those three tests are the one thing CI cannot answer
 for.

app/src/main/java/org/libremediaconverter/model/ContainerCapabilities.kt

@@ -178,7 +178,12 @@ object ContainerCapabilities {
             if (!probe.hasVideo) {
                 return Validation.Invalid(
                     "This file has no video track to copy.",
-                    listOf(spec.copy(videoCodec = VideoCodec.NONE)),
+                    // Dropping the video is the right shape of answer, but it is only half of one:
+                    // `spec.copy(videoCodec = NONE)` is valid exactly when the audio axis already
+                    // happened to be fine, and refused otherwise — a Vorbis or PCM source into MP4,
+                    // an MP3 into WebM. Handing it to the shared path repairs both axes and drops
+                    // anything that still fails, so the chip cannot lead to a second error.
+                    suggestions(spec.copy(videoCodec = VideoCodec.NONE), probe, exclude = spec),
                 )
             }
             val source = CodecNames.videoFromName(probe.videoCodec)

app/src/test/java/org/libremediaconverter/model/ContainerCapabilitiesTest.kt

@@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ import org.junit.Test
  * `OutputFormat` used to be twelve hand-picked triples, and its KDoc defended that on the grounds
  * that a closed set was what made routing decidable. Opening it up moves that burden here, so this
  * is where decidability now has to be proven.
+ *
+ * That includes what a refusal offers instead. `Validation.Invalid` promises every suggestion is
+ * itself valid and names this class as the proof, so a branch that assembles its own suggestion
+ * list rather than going through `suggestions()` is only checked here if some row happens to reach
+ * it — which is how a dead-end chip survived two widenings of that table.
  */
 class ContainerCapabilitiesTest {
 
@@ -35,6 +40,29 @@ class ContainerCapabilitiesTest {
         container = Container.MP3,
     )
 
+    /**
+     * An audio-only input carrying a codec MP4 has no place for at all.
+     *
+     * Vorbis lives in Ogg and Matroska; MP4 carries AAC, MP3, Opus and FLAC. That gap is what turns
+     * a suggestion which merely drops the video track into a second refusal.
+     */
+    private val vorbisSource = InputProbe(
+        videoCodec = null,
+        audioCodec = "vorbis",
+        hasVideo = false,
+        kind = InputKind.AUDIO_ONLY,
+        container = Container.OGG,
+    )
+
+    /** The same shape, for the other codec MP4 refuses. One case is a coincidence; two is the rule. */
+    private val pcmSource = InputProbe(
+        videoCodec = null,
+        audioCodec = "pcm_s16le",
+        hasVideo = false,
+        kind = InputKind.AUDIO_ONLY,
+        container = Container.WAV,
+    )
+
     // --- copy and encode are different questions ----------------------------
 
     /**
@@ -97,7 +125,17 @@ class ContainerCapabilitiesTest {
         }
     }
 
-    /** A suggestion that is itself invalid is worse than no suggestion. */
+    /**
+     * A suggestion that is itself invalid is worse than no suggestion.
+     *
+     * Only a branch that assembles its own suggestion list can break that promise: [suggestions]
+     * ends by filtering on `validate(...).isValid`, so everything routed through it is valid by
+     * construction. Those branches are what this table has to cover — the image output, and copy
+     * the video from a file that has none, which built its list by hand and came back refused for
+     * a Vorbis or PCM source into MP4 and an MP3 into WebM. The Advanced picker showed a one-tap
+     * fix that led straight to a second error, through two widenings of this table that never
+     * reached the branch.
+     */
     @Test
     fun `every suggestion is itself valid`() {
         val cases = listOf(
@@ -109,15 +147,31 @@ class ContainerCapabilitiesTest {
             OutputSpec(Container.MP4, VideoCodec.COPY, AudioCodec.NONE) to mp3Source,
             OutputSpec(Container.MP4, VideoCodec.NONE, AudioCodec.NONE) to mp3Source,
             OutputSpec(Container.MP4, VideoCodec.COPY, AudioCodec.AAC) to mp3Source,
+            // Copy-the-video-from-a-file-with-no-video, the last branch that built its offer by
+            // hand. It escaped the five rows above because `spec.copy(videoCodec = NONE)` is valid
+            // exactly when the audio axis happens to be fine — true for the AAC and MP3 sources
+            // used there, false for any audio the target container cannot carry.
+            OutputSpec(Container.MP4, VideoCodec.COPY, AudioCodec.COPY) to vorbisSource,
+            OutputSpec(Container.MP4, VideoCodec.COPY, AudioCodec.COPY) to pcmSource,
+            OutputSpec(Container.WEBM, VideoCodec.COPY, AudioCodec.COPY) to mp3Source,
+            // The same branch with audio the container *can* hold, which is the half that already
+            // worked and must keep working: the repair here is a copy, so the offer is the very
+            // spec the caller handed to `suggestions`. It survives only because the exclusion is
+            // against what the user asked for rather than against the repair.
+            OutputSpec(Container.MP4, VideoCodec.COPY, AudioCodec.COPY) to mp3Source,
+            // The one branch that still builds its list by hand, so that it is asserted rather
+            // than merely reasoned about: an image container takes `None + None` and nothing else,
+            // which makes its single offer valid by construction.
+            OutputSpec(Container.GIF, VideoCodec.H264, AudioCodec.AAC) to h264Source,
         )
 
         cases.forEach { (spec, probe) ->
             val invalid = ContainerCapabilities.validate(spec, probe) as? Validation.Invalid
                 ?: throw AssertionError("expected $spec to be rejected")
-            assertTrue("no alternatives offered for $spec", invalid.suggestions.isNotEmpty())
+            assertTrue("no alternatives offered for $spec on $probe", invalid.suggestions.isNotEmpty())
             invalid.suggestions.forEach { suggestion ->
                 assertTrue(
-                    "suggested $suggestion for $spec is itself invalid",
+                    "suggested $suggestion for $spec on $probe is itself invalid",
                     ContainerCapabilities.validate(suggestion, probe).isValid,
                 )
             }