Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into merge-121-tmp

app/src/main/java/org/libremediaconverter/ui/theme/Theme.kt

@@ -25,8 +25,18 @@ private val LightColorScheme = lightColorScheme(
  * Material 3 theme.
  *
  * Dynamic color (Material You) needs API 31+; minSdk is 33, so it is available
- * unconditionally and no version guard is required. It stays switchable so users can
- * opt back to the brand palette.
+ * unconditionally and no version guard is required.
+ *
+ * [dynamicColor] has no caller. `MainActivity` is the single call site and takes the
+ * default, so the parameter is always `true`, the two dynamic branches always win, and
+ * [DarkColorScheme] and [LightColorScheme] are dead: nothing in the app can opt back to the
+ * brand palette. `ThemeColorSchemeTest` reaches those two branches only by passing
+ * [dynamicColor] explicitly -- a test doing it, not a feature.
+ *
+ * That is known rather than an oversight. #68 holds the choice between adding a switch,
+ * deleting the dead branches together with the template palette, and replacing that palette
+ * first; it is undecided, so nothing here should be read as a promise that any of them
+ * happens.
  */
 @Composable
 fun LibreMediaConverterTheme(

app/src/test/java/org/libremediaconverter/ui/theme/ThemeColorSchemeTest.kt

@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.ui.theme
+
+import androidx.compose.material3.ColorScheme
+import androidx.compose.material3.MaterialTheme
+import androidx.compose.ui.graphics.luminance
+import androidx.compose.ui.test.junit4.v2.createComposeRule
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertNotEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
+import org.junit.Rule
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+
+/**
+ * The theme has to resolve the scheme its arguments name, and `ThemeKt` had no test at all --
+ * 23 lines, none of them covered, which is how #68 was found.
+ *
+ * Only two of the four branches in [LibreMediaConverterTheme]'s `when` are reachable from the
+ * app. `MainActivity` is the single call site and passes no arguments, so `dynamicColor` is
+ * always `true` and the live choice is between the dynamic dark and dynamic light schemes.
+ * Those two are what ships, and asserting on them survives whichever way #68 is decided.
+ *
+ * **The other two branches have no caller.** `dynamicColor = false` is passed below by this
+ * test and by nothing else in `app/src`, so the coverage it produces is not evidence that a
+ * switch exists -- misreading it that way is the whole reason #68 was filed. #68 is the open
+ * decision about whether one ever will exist.
+ *
+ * What the assertions distinguish the branches on was measured under Robolectric `sdk=36`
+ * rather than assumed. The dynamic palette resolves to the platform's own default there --
+ * dark background `#121318` against light `#FAF8FF`, dark primary `#B0C6FF` -- and that is a
+ * different hue from the brand palette's [Purple80] / [Purple40]. A dynamic scheme reads the
+ * device, so those exact values belong to the Robolectric stub and to no particular phone,
+ * which is why the live-branch tests compare the two resolved schemes against each other
+ * instead of hard-coding either one.
+ */
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class ThemeColorSchemeTest {
+
+    // The **v2** rule (`androidx.compose.ui.test.junit4.v2`), as everywhere else in this
+    // source set.
+    @get:Rule
+    val composeRule = createComposeRule()
+
+    /**
+     * Every scheme the `when` can produce, read out of [MaterialTheme] inside the content
+     * lambda -- the only place that shows what the theme actually chose, rather than what the
+     * caller hoped for.
+     *
+     * All four are resolved in one composition because `setContent` may be called once per
+     * test, and a comparison needs at least two of them.
+     */
+    private fun resolveAll(): Schemes {
+        lateinit var dynamicDark: ColorScheme
+        lateinit var dynamicLight: ColorScheme
+        lateinit var brandDark: ColorScheme
+        lateinit var brandLight: ColorScheme
+        composeRule.setContent {
+            LibreMediaConverterTheme(darkTheme = true) { dynamicDark = MaterialTheme.colorScheme }
+            LibreMediaConverterTheme(darkTheme = false) { dynamicLight = MaterialTheme.colorScheme }
+            LibreMediaConverterTheme(darkTheme = true, dynamicColor = false) {
+                brandDark = MaterialTheme.colorScheme
+            }
+            LibreMediaConverterTheme(darkTheme = false, dynamicColor = false) {
+                brandLight = MaterialTheme.colorScheme
+            }
+        }
+        composeRule.waitForIdle()
+        return Schemes(dynamicDark, dynamicLight, brandDark, brandLight)
+    }
+
+    private class Schemes(
+        val dynamicDark: ColorScheme,
+        val dynamicLight: ColorScheme,
+        val brandDark: ColorScheme,
+        val brandLight: ColorScheme,
+    )
+
+    /**
+     * The live branches, and the one assertion that catches them being swapped: both dynamic
+     * schemes come from the same device palette, so they are similar enough that identity or a
+     * bare inequality would prove nothing. Background luminance is not similar -- it is the
+     * thing dark mode is for.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `dark mode resolves a darker scheme than light mode`() {
+        val schemes = resolveAll()
+
+        val dark = schemes.dynamicDark.background.luminance()
+        val light = schemes.dynamicLight.background.luminance()
+        assertTrue(
+            "darkTheme = true should resolve the dynamic dark scheme, whose background " +
+                "luminance ($dark) is below the light scheme's ($light)",
+            dark < light,
+        )
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Which of the two dark branches ran, and which of the two light ones: the scheme a live
+     * call resolves is the dynamic one, not the brand palette sitting next to it.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `the live branches take the dynamic palette rather than the brand one`() {
+        val schemes = resolveAll()
+
+        assertNotEquals(
+            "the default dynamicColor = true should not resolve the brand dark palette",
+            Purple80,
+            schemes.dynamicDark.primary,
+        )
+        assertNotEquals(
+            "the default dynamicColor = true should not resolve the brand light palette",
+            Purple40,
+            schemes.dynamicLight.primary,
+        )
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The two dead branches. Nothing in `app/src` passes `dynamicColor = false`; this test
+     * does it directly, because the parameter is public, and that is the only way either
+     * branch runs. Covered so a later decision on #68 starts from a tested `when` -- not
+     * because the brand palette is reachable in the app.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `the brand palette branches run only when dynamicColor is passed explicitly`() {
+        val schemes = resolveAll()
+
+        assertEquals(Purple80, schemes.brandDark.primary)
+        assertEquals(Purple40, schemes.brandLight.primary)
+    }
+}