Re-measure after wave 3, and write down the two kinds of gap it had to separate

92.8% line (2183/2352), 81.3% branch (1091/1342), 584 JVM tests in 87 classes, measured 2026-09-02 on the tree this branch creates rather than quoted from a PR body. The shape of the wave is worth more than the number, and it is different from the two before it. Waves 1 and 2 were finding uncovered code; by wave 3 there was little of that left, so the gaps had to be sorted before any test was written. Coverage gaps -- filtered to sites where JaCoCo reports mi > 0, which is what separates a real gap from a partial branch on a compound condition, and which cut the candidate list roughly in half. And assertion gaps, where JaCoCo is green and nothing checks the answer: MainActivity's rail and bottom bar were both executed and transposing them passed the entire suite, as did swapping the two progress-notification strings and swapping Content's two destinations. No coverage number would have found any of the three. Naming the required mutation per ticket earned its keep three times, each recorded with what the weak assertion actually was. Also recorded: a green mutation is only evidence when the mutation is a real change -- one classify reordering was semantically equivalent for every reachable input, and a bad mutation and a weak test look identical in the output. Two entries came back as not gaps, which is a result rather than a shortfall: ContainerCapabilities:282's exclude filter cannot drop anything, and probeForConcat's catch arm is unreachable on this runtime -- Robolectric's MediaExtractor never throws from setDataSource, measured across four input shapes. Both denominators moved, in opposite directions and for different reasons, so they are stated rather than folded into the percentage: 1340 -> 1342 branches from MediaProbe.merge, 2348 -> 2352 lines from the ConcatJoiner interface. Neither is new untested code. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
C1 (#176 ): give ConcatWorker the seam ConversionWorker always had, and test what was behind it
2026-09-01 22:09:35 -05:00 · 2026-09-01 22:06:52 -05:00 · 2026-09-01 21:59:00 -05:00 · 2026-09-01 21:54:50 -05:00 · 2026-09-01 21:50:31 -05:00 · 2026-09-01 21:48:36 -05:00
21 changed files with 1459 additions and 20 deletions
@@ -130,9 +130,9 @@ install for code that can never run — and on API 37 the full APK does not fit
 - The `model` package is excluded from `ReturnCount` and `CyclomaticComplexMethod` only. It is the
  decision layer, where one branch is one documented user-visible outcome and the metric counts
  answers rather than complexity. Every other rule still applies there.
- **Coverage is reported, not gated** — **88.9% of lines (2087/2348), 75.4% of branches
-  (1011/1340)**, measured 2026-08-29 with `./gradlew :app:jacocoTestReport`, against 546 JVM tests
-  in 76 classes.
+- **Coverage is reported, not gated** — **92.8% of lines (2183/2352), 81.3% of branches
+  (1091/1342)**, measured 2026-09-02 with `./gradlew :app:jacocoTestReport`, against 584 JVM tests
+  in 87 classes.

  **Every figure this file carried before 2026-08-24 was an artifact, roughly half the real one.**
  Robolectric loads classes through its own sandbox classloader with no source location, JaCoCo
@@ -174,6 +174,66 @@ install for code that can never run — and on API 37 the full APK does not fit
  denominator shrank is not the same claim as one that rises because more branches are tested, and
  this entry has a history of explaining its own numbers wrongly.

+  Then wave 3 (#167-#178) on 2026-09-02 — 88.9% -> 92.8% line, 75.4% -> **81.3%** branch, 546 ->
+  584 tests, in ten PRs from #179 to #188.
+
+  **Its shape is different from the two before it, and the difference is the thing to carry
+  forward.** Waves 1 and 2 were finding uncovered code. By wave 3 there was not much of that left,
+  so the gaps were sorted into two kinds before any test was written:
+
+  - **coverage gaps** — the line never executes. Filtered to sites where JaCoCo reports `mi > 0`, a
+    concrete instruction no test runs, which is what separates a real gap from a partial branch on
+    a compound condition. That filter cut the candidate list roughly in half and was right to.
+  - **assertion gaps** — JaCoCo is green and nothing checks the answer. `MainActivity`'s rail and
+    bottom bar were both *executed* by `AppRootRestorationTest` and **transposing them passed the
+    entire suite**; so did swapping the two progress-notification strings, and swapping `Content`'s
+    two destinations. No coverage number would ever have found any of the three.
+
+  So **every ticket named the mutation that had to go red, and that was its acceptance criterion
+  rather than a coverage delta**. It caught **two vacuous tests written in the same session**,
+  before either shipped:
+
+  - a `firstContainerHolding` test asserting a refusal still offered *something*. True, and
+    useless: the source container is a candidate in its own right, so the list stays non-empty
+    whatever the fallback does. What it actually buys is the codec the user asked for.
+  - a staged-delete test scanning for a `"join-"` prefix `StagingNames.forJob` does not produce —
+    it names files `<jobId>.<ext>`, so the assertion was true of everything.
+
+  It also corrected a *third* test that was not vacuous: `probeForConcat`'s KDoc claimed to drive
+  the `catch` arm, and rethrowing from that catch left it green. That is how the arm turned out to
+  be unreachable — see the next paragraph. A passing test with a wrong explanation is its own
+  failure mode.
+
+  **A green mutation is only evidence when the mutation is a real change**, which is the mirror
+  trap: one `classify` mutation stayed green because reordering two arms was semantically
+  equivalent for every reachable input. A bad mutation and a weak test look identical in the output.
+
+  Three things came back **not as the ticket described them**, which is a result rather than a
+  shortfall:
+
+  - `ContainerCapabilities:282`'s `exclude` filter **cannot drop anything**. `repair` always
+    changes a codec on the shared container — a codec it left alone is one `validate` would not
+    have refused — and the one non-default `exclude` carries `COPY` while every candidate carries
+    `NONE`. F4-shaped.
+  - `probeForConcat`'s catch arm is **unreachable on this runtime**. Robolectric's `MediaExtractor`
+    never throws from `setDataSource`, measured across an unregistered `content://` authority, a
+    missing `file://`, a file of garbage bytes and an `http://` URL — all four returned with
+    `trackCount = 0`. It stays device-only.
+  - `JobSnapshots:31`'s missed arm was **not** the `!isFile` one the ticket named — that is already
+    covered by the `reclaimed` fixture. It was `path == null`: a job carrying no output path at
+    all. Read the report, not the ticket, when the two disagree.
+
+  One item was **included against** the F4 rule rather than exempted by it, and the distinction is
+  worth having written down since both live in the same function: `ContainerCapabilities:94`
+  (`accepts(container, VideoCodec.NONE, mode)`) is dead in production today — every caller guards
+  `NONE` first — and was tested anyway, because its audio twin at `:101` has had a test since #136
+  and the asymmetry was the argument. The `COPY -> error(...)` arms beside it stay exempt, because
+  a second line of defence that can be provoked is not one.
+
+  Denominators moved here too, in both directions and for two different reasons: 1340 -> 1342
+  branches from `MediaProbe.merge`, 2348 -> 2352 lines from the `ConcatJoiner` interface. Neither
+  is new untested code.
+
  And **re-measure before quoting**: this entry was once written quoting 81.4%, measured four hours
  earlier, and was already three points stale by the time it was ready to merge.
 - **Testable code is not done until it is tested.** If a piece is unit testable, it gets unit
@@ -24,9 +24,11 @@ import androidx.compose.runtime.saveable.Saver
 import androidx.compose.runtime.saveable.rememberSaveable
 import androidx.compose.runtime.setValue
 import androidx.compose.ui.Modifier
+import androidx.compose.ui.platform.testTag
 import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
 import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConverterScreen
 import org.libremediaconverter.join.JoinScreen
+import org.libremediaconverter.ui.TestTags
 import org.libremediaconverter.ui.theme.LibreMediaConverterTheme

 /**
@@ -114,7 +116,7 @@ internal fun AppRoot(

    if (useRail) {
        Row(modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize()) {
-            NavigationRail {
+            NavigationRail(modifier = Modifier.testTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL)) {
                Destination.entries.forEach { item ->
                    NavigationRailItem(
                        selected = destination == item,
@@ -132,7 +134,7 @@ internal fun AppRoot(
        Scaffold(
            modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize(),
            bottomBar = {
-                NavigationBar {
+                NavigationBar(modifier = Modifier.testTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR)) {
                    Destination.entries.forEach { item ->
                        NavigationBarItem(
                            selected = destination == item,
@@ -50,19 +50,42 @@ object MediaProbe {
    )

    fun probe(context: Context, uri: Uri): InputProbe {
-        val extracted = probeWithExtractor(context, uri)
-        val info = probeWithFFprobe(context, uri)
+        val merged = merge(probeWithExtractor(context, uri), probeWithFFprobe(context, uri))
+        if (merged.kind == InputKind.UNPARSEABLE) {
+            // Not a failure: an unparseable input is a strong signal that this job belongs on
+            // FFmpeg. Reporting an unknown codec makes the router say so.
+            Log.i(TAG, "Neither MediaExtractor nor FFprobe could read $uri; routing to FFmpeg.")
+        }
+        return merged
+    }

+    /**
+     * What the two probes together say about one input.
+     *
+     * A pure function, and `internal` for the same reason [extractedFrom] is: the precedence rules
+     * below are the answer to "which probe wins", and until this was pulled out of [probe] the only
+     * way to ask was to have a real `MediaExtractor` and a real FFprobe **disagree**, which nothing
+     * on any source set can arrange. `RemuxTest` drives this on a device against committed
+     * fixtures, but only ever with one probe answering and the other agreeing or also failing --
+     * so every elvis here was taken in one direction and never the other.
+     *
+     * The rules, each of which is a decision rather than an accident:
+     *
+     * - **The extractor wins on codecs.** It is the platform's own view of what it can decode,
+     *   which is the thing the router is about to ask about. FFprobe's name for the same track can
+     *   differ, and the copy planner keys off these strings.
+     * - **FFprobe alone reports the container.** `MediaExtractor` cannot, which is why [InputProbe]
+     *   carries a nullable one and `CopyPlanner` treats null as "container unknown".
+     * - **Duration is the larger of the two**, not the first non-zero. Either probe can report zero
+     *   for a file the other times correctly, and a zero duration makes the FFmpeg progress
+     *   percentage undefined.
+     */
+    internal fun merge(extracted: Extracted?, info: FFprobeInfo?): InputProbe {
        val videoCodec = extracted?.videoCodec ?: info?.videoCodec
        val audioCodec = extracted?.audioCodec ?: info?.audioCodec
        val kind = classify(extracted, info)

-        if (kind == InputKind.UNPARSEABLE) {
-            // Not a failure: an unparseable input is a strong signal that this job belongs on
-            // FFmpeg. Reporting an unknown codec makes the router say so.
-            Log.i(TAG, "Neither MediaExtractor nor FFprobe could read $uri; routing to FFmpeg.")
-            return UNREADABLE
-        }
+        if (kind == InputKind.UNPARSEABLE) return UNREADABLE

        return InputProbe(
            videoCodec = videoCodec,
@@ -83,7 +106,7 @@ object MediaProbe {
     * audio file and a corrupt file indistinguishable. The source-info card cannot describe either
     * honestly until they are separate, and neither can the copy planner.
     */
-    private fun classify(extracted: Extracted?, info: FFprobeInfo?): InputKind = when {
+    internal fun classify(extracted: Extracted?, info: FFprobeInfo?): InputKind = when {
        info?.isImage == true -> InputKind.IMAGE
        extracted == null && info == null -> InputKind.UNPARSEABLE
        (extracted?.videoCodec ?: info?.videoCodec) != null -> InputKind.VIDEO
@@ -162,7 +185,11 @@ object MediaProbe {
        }
    }

-    private class FFprobeInfo(
+    /**
+     * `internal` rather than `private` for the same reason [Extracted] is, and it should have been
+     * from the start: [merge] cannot be named from a test while half its signature is private.
+     */
+    internal class FFprobeInfo(
        val container: Container?,
        val videoCodec: String?,
        val audioCodec: String?,
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ import android.content.Context
 import android.net.Uri
 import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
 import org.libremediaconverter.codec.AndroidDeviceCodecs
+import org.libremediaconverter.ffmpeg.ConcatEngine
 import org.libremediaconverter.ffmpeg.FFmpegEngine
 import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConversionRequest
 import org.libremediaconverter.model.DeviceCodecs
@@ -40,6 +41,27 @@ interface SoftwareTranscoder {
    )
 }

+/**
+ * The join path. Implemented by [org.libremediaconverter.ffmpeg.ConcatEngine].
+ *
+ * Added last of the three, and the gap it closes was measured rather than guessed:
+ * `PerJobStagingTest`'s KDoc records that reverting `ConcatWorker` to a constant staging name left
+ * all 257 tests green, because nothing in the JVM suite can get past a `ConcatEngine` constructed
+ * in place. Everything after that line -- the failure mapping, the message fallback, the staged
+ * delete -- was untested on every source set.
+ *
+ * The result type stays nested in the implementation rather than being lifted here. Moving it would
+ * touch every call site to buy nothing: what a test needs is the ability to *not* run FFmpeg, and
+ * that is the method, not the type.
+ */
+interface ConcatJoiner {
+    suspend fun join(
+        inputs: List<Uri>,
+        output: File,
+        format: OutputFormat = OutputFormat.MP4_H264,
+    ): ConcatEngine.Result
+}
+
 /**
 * The seam that lets tests force failure paths.
 *
@@ -69,6 +91,9 @@ object ConversionDependencies {
    @Volatile
    var software: () -> SoftwareTranscoder = { FFmpegEngine() }

+    @Volatile
+    var concat: (Context) -> ConcatJoiner = { ConcatEngine(it) }
+
    @Volatile
    var publisher: (Context) -> OutputPublisher = { OutputPublisher(it) }

@@ -103,6 +128,7 @@ object ConversionDependencies {
    fun reset() {
        hardware = { Media3Engine(it) }
        software = { FFmpegEngine() }
+        concat = { ConcatEngine(it) }
        publisher = { OutputPublisher(it) }
        deviceCodecs = { AndroidDeviceCodecs.get() }
        probe = { context, uri -> MediaProbe.probe(context, uri) }
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ import com.arthenica.ffmpegkit.FFmpegKit
 import com.arthenica.ffmpegkit.FFmpegKitConfig
 import com.arthenica.ffmpegkit.ReturnCode
 import kotlinx.coroutines.suspendCancellableCoroutine
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConcatJoiner
 import org.libremediaconverter.convert.MediaProbe
 import org.libremediaconverter.convert.StagingNames
 import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConcatPlanner
@@ -24,11 +25,11 @@ import kotlin.coroutines.resumeWithException
 * reliably fail when they differ — it can emit a file whose later segments are
 * garbled. See [ConcatPlanner].
 */
-class ConcatEngine(private val context: Context) {
+class ConcatEngine(private val context: Context) : ConcatJoiner {

    data class Result(val strategy: ConcatStrategy, val output: File)

-    suspend fun join(inputs: List<Uri>, output: File, format: OutputFormat = OutputFormat.MP4_H264): Result {
+    override suspend fun join(inputs: List<Uri>, output: File, format: OutputFormat): Result {
        require(inputs.size >= 2) { "Joining needs at least two files." }

        val paths = inputs.map { uri ->
@@ -56,6 +56,20 @@ object TestTags {
     */
    const val RETRY_SAVE: String = "action.retrySave"

+    /**
+     * The adaptive shell around both screens -- `AppRoot`'s two layouts.
+     *
+     * Named because there is no other way to tell them apart from a test. Both render the same two
+     * destinations with the same labels and the same selection state, so every assertion that could
+     * be written without these tags is satisfied by either layout, and transposing the two bodies
+     * passed the whole suite. Exactly one of the two exists at a time, which is what makes
+     * `assertExists` / `assertDoesNotExist` on this pair a statement about the width class.
+     */
+    object Shell {
+        const val NAVIGATION_RAIL: String = "shell.navigationRail"
+        const val NAVIGATION_BAR: String = "shell.navigationBar"
+    }
+
    /** `ConverterScreen`. */
    object Converter {
        const val CHOOSE_FILE: String = "converter.chooseFile"
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ import kotlinx.coroutines.CancellationException
 import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConversionDependencies
 import org.libremediaconverter.convert.InputQuery
 import org.libremediaconverter.convert.StagingNames
-import org.libremediaconverter.ffmpeg.ConcatEngine
 import org.libremediaconverter.model.OutputFormat

 /**
@@ -37,7 +36,7 @@ class ConcatWorker(context: Context, params: WorkerParameters) : CoroutineWorker

    override suspend fun doWork(): Result {
        val uris = inputData.getStringArray(KEY_INPUT_URIS)?.map(Uri::parse)
-            ?: return Result.failure(workDataOf(KEY_ERROR to "No input files."))
+            ?: return Result.failure(workDataOf(KEY_ERROR to NO_INPUTS_MESSAGE))
        if (uris.size < 2) {
            return Result.failure(workDataOf(KEY_ERROR to TOO_FEW_INPUTS_MESSAGE))
        }
@@ -77,7 +76,7 @@ class ConcatWorker(context: Context, params: WorkerParameters) : CoroutineWorker
                ),
            )

-            val result = ConcatEngine(applicationContext).join(uris, staged, format)
+            val result = ConversionDependencies.concat(applicationContext).join(uris, staged, format)
            Result.success(
                workDataOf(
                    KEY_OUTPUT_PATH to staged.absolutePath,
@@ -148,6 +147,16 @@ class ConcatWorker(context: Context, params: WorkerParameters) : CoroutineWorker
         * Here rather than in the ViewModel because the rule is the worker's: `request(...)` takes
         * a `List<Uri>` and checks nothing about its length, so this is the guard that always runs.
         */
+        /**
+         * A job carrying no input array at all -- a downgrade, or a queue entry from a build that
+         * spelled the key differently.
+         *
+         * A constant rather than the literal it was, for the convention #158 established: a message
+         * the user can see is named once, so a test asserts the same string the worker writes
+         * rather than a copy of it that can drift.
+         */
+        const val NO_INPUTS_MESSAGE: String = "No input files."
+
        const val TOO_FEW_INPUTS_MESSAGE: String = "Pick at least two files to join."

        /**
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter
+
+import androidx.activity.ComponentActivity
+import androidx.compose.material3.windowsizeclass.WindowWidthSizeClass
+import androidx.compose.ui.test.junit4.v2.createAndroidComposeRule
+import androidx.compose.ui.test.onNodeWithTag
+import androidx.compose.ui.test.onNodeWithText
+import androidx.compose.ui.test.performClick
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.Data
+import org.junit.After
+import org.junit.Before
+import org.junit.Rule
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConversionDependencies
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.installTestWorkManager
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.InputProbe
+import org.libremediaconverter.ui.TestTags
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+
+/**
+ * Which navigation affordance the shell actually renders, and which screen it actually shows.
+ *
+ * Assertion gaps rather than coverage gaps, both of them, and that is why they lasted.
+ * `AppRootRestorationTest` already drives `AppRoot` at `Compact` and `Expanded`, so JaCoCo is green
+ * on `useRail` -- but it asserts only that the *selected tab* survives recreation, through a stub
+ * `content` composable. Nothing anywhere queried for a rail or a bar, and nothing rendered the real
+ * screens. Two consequences, both measured before this file existed:
+ *
+ * - **Transposing the `NavigationRail` and `NavigationBar` bodies passed the entire suite.**
+ * - **Transposing `Content`'s two arms passed it too** -- a tablet showing the phone chrome, or the
+ *   Convert tab opening the Join screen, and 546 tests with nothing to say about either.
+ *
+ * `AppRoot`'s own KDoc is why this matters more than it looks: from targetSdk 37 the app is resized
+ * and rotated whether or not it is ready, so the width class is not a preference, it is whatever
+ * the system hands over.
+ *
+ * ## Two things this needed that the rest of the suite does not
+ *
+ * **`createAndroidComposeRule`, not `createComposeRule`.** Rendering `AppRoot` with its *default*
+ * content reaches `ConverterScreen`'s `viewModel = viewModel()`, which needs a
+ * `ViewModelStoreOwner`; the plain rule supplies none. It works because both ViewModels are
+ * `@JvmOverloads constructor(app: Application, …)`, so `AndroidViewModelFactory` can build them,
+ * and because `app/build.gradle.kts` already puts `ui-test-manifest`'s `ComponentActivity` in the
+ * merged manifest the unit tests build against -- which that file says in terms.
+ *
+ * **Tags on the two bars.** They are in `TestTags`, applied inside `main`, for the reason that
+ * file's KDoc gives: a tag the test hands down proves only that the test set it.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class AdaptiveShellTest {
+
+    @get:Rule
+    val composeRule = createAndroidComposeRule<ComponentActivity>()
+
+    @Before
+    fun setUp() {
+        val app = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+        installTestWorkManager(app, Data.EMPTY)
+        // The real screens are composed here, so their ViewModels are real too. Neither test is
+        // about probing or publishing; left alone they would reach the FFprobe loader and this
+        // machine's codec list, and decide things no assertion mentions.
+        ConversionDependencies.probe = { _, _ -> InputProbe() }
+    }
+
+    @After
+    fun tearDown() {
+        ConversionDependencies.reset()
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a phone gets the bottom bar and a tablet gets the rail`() {
+        setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Compact)
+
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR).assertExists()
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL).assertDoesNotExist()
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `an expanded window gets the rail`() {
+        setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Expanded)
+
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL).assertExists()
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR).assertDoesNotExist()
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The width class no test had ever passed.
+     *
+     * `useRail` is `!= Compact`, so Medium takes the rail with Expanded. Narrowing it to
+     * `== Expanded` is a one-character change that breaks every tablet and unfolded foldable and
+     * nothing else -- and until this test, nothing in either source set used `Medium` at all.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `a medium window is a rail window, not a phone`() {
+        setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Medium)
+
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL).assertExists()
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR).assertDoesNotExist()
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The mapping every other test stubs out: which screen each destination actually opens.
+     *
+     * Matched on each screen's own "choose a file" affordance rather than on a title, because those
+     * tags are applied by the screens themselves -- so this fails if the destinations are
+     * transposed, and it fails for the right reason.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `Convert opens the converter and Join opens the join screen`() {
+        setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Compact)
+
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Converter.CHOOSE_FILE).assertExists()
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Join.CHOOSE_FILES).assertDoesNotExist()
+
+        composeRule.onNodeWithText(Destination.JOIN.label).performClick()
+
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Join.CHOOSE_FILES).assertExists()
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Converter.CHOOSE_FILE).assertDoesNotExist()
+    }
+
+    /** [AppRoot] with its real content, which is the half nothing else composes. */
+    private fun setShell(width: WindowWidthSizeClass) {
+        composeRule.setContent { AppRoot(width) }
+    }
+}
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ import org.junit.Assert.assertNull
 import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
 import org.junit.Test
 import org.libremediaconverter.model.CodecNames
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.InputProbe
 import org.libremediaconverter.model.VideoCodec

 /**
@@ -133,6 +134,38 @@ class CodecVocabularyTest {
     * landed, a device with no HEVC decoder answered true for `x265` and Media3 was handed a job it
     * could not do; now the router sends it to FFmpeg without spending the attempt.
     */
+    /**
+     * The sentinel is not just another unknown name, and the difference is the whole guard.
+     *
+     * `canDecode` ends `?: true` -- a name neither table knows keeps the permissive answer, because
+     * the app would rather try than refuse a file it might handle. `InputProbe.UNPARSEABLE` has to
+     * be the exception: the platform has *already* failed to parse the input, so there is nothing
+     * for a decoder to be permissive about, and waving it through spends a Media3 attempt on a job
+     * that cannot start.
+     *
+     * The `cinepak` line is what makes the sentinel line mean something. Without it, deleting the
+     * early return leaves this test green -- both names would fall through to the same `?: true`.
+     * The pair is the assertion.
+     *
+     * `DeviceCodecs.PERMISSIVE` carries the same rule and `ConversionRouterTest` pins its routing
+     * consequence. This is the implementation that runs on a device.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `the unparseable sentinel is refused even where an unknown name is waved through`() {
+        val everything = AndroidDeviceCodecs.forTesting(
+            encoders = emptySet(),
+            decoders = setOf("video/avc", "video/hevc"),
+        )
+        assertFalse(
+            "the platform could not parse this input, so there is nothing to decode with",
+            everything.canDecode(InputProbe.UNPARSEABLE),
+        )
+        assertTrue(
+            "a merely unknown name still keeps the permissive answer",
+            everything.canDecode("cinepak"),
+        )
+    }
+
    @Test
    fun `a device without the decoder now says so for the aliases it used to wave through`() {
        val hevcOnly = AndroidDeviceCodecs.forTesting(encoders = emptySet(), decoders = setOf("video/hevc"))
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.convert
+
+import android.net.Uri
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import kotlinx.coroutines.runBlocking
+import kotlinx.coroutines.withTimeout
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertFalse
+import org.junit.Assert.assertNotEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertNull
+import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.AudioCodec
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.AudioPlan
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.Container
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConversionRequest
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.CopyPlanner
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.InputProbe
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.OutputSpec
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.VideoCodec
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.VideoPlan
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+import java.io.File
+import java.util.concurrent.CancellationException
+
+/**
+ * A job that reached Media3 with a container Media3 cannot mux.
+ *
+ * [Media3Muxers]' own KDoc names the defect this guards: *"the router claimed five containers while
+ * the engine silently wrote MP4 for all of them."* `factoryFor` answers null for fourteen of the
+ * app's containers, and `buildTransformer` turns that null into a failed job rather than letting
+ * `Transformer` fall back to its default muxer.
+ *
+ * The guard had never fired. `Media3Engine$buildTransformer$3` -- the `requireNotNull` message
+ * lambda -- was four lines and four branches at 0%, which is to say the entire repair for a defect
+ * the codebase went to the trouble of writing down was untested. Weakening it would restore that
+ * bug silently, because the wrong output is a *playable file with the wrong container*, not a crash.
+ *
+ * Same harness and same two disciplines as [Media3EngineEmptyCompositionTest]: assert the plan
+ * really is the one the test needs before driving the engine, and rule out
+ * `CancellationException` so an unresumed continuation cannot read as a pass.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class Media3MuxerGuardTest {
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a container Media3 cannot mux fails the job rather than silently writing MP4`() {
+        val context = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+        val engine = Media3Engine(context)
+        val request = ConversionRequest(
+            spec = OutputSpec(Container.WEBM, VideoCodec.VP9, AudioCodec.OPUS),
+            probe = InputProbe(videoCodec = "h264", audioCodec = "aac", container = Container.MP4),
+        )
+
+        // The premise, asserted rather than assumed -- three separate ways this test could pass
+        // over a path it never entered.
+        val plan = CopyPlanner.plan(request.spec, request.probe)
+        assertEquals("the plan has to still be WebM by the time the engine sees it", Container.WEBM, plan.container)
+        assertNull("...and Media3 really has no muxer for it", Media3Muxers.factoryFor(plan.container))
+        // Not the empty-composition refusal, which fires earlier and is a different test's subject.
+        assertNotEquals(VideoPlan.Drop, plan.video)
+        assertNotEquals(AudioPlan.Drop, plan.audio)
+
+        val failure = try {
+            runCatching {
+                runBlocking {
+                    withTimeout(TIMEOUT_MS) {
+                        engine.transcode(Uri.parse("file:///dev/null"), File(context.cacheDir, "guard.webm"), request) {
+                        }
+                    }
+                }
+            }.exceptionOrNull()
+        } finally {
+            engine.close()
+        }
+
+        assertFalse(
+            "the continuation was never resumed -- the refusal escaped instead of failing the job: $failure",
+            failure is CancellationException,
+        )
+        // Type *and* message, and the message half is the load-bearing one. Replacing the
+        // requireNotNull with a fallback factory does not make the export succeed here: it lets it
+        // run on and fail some other way, which a bare type assertion would happily accept.
+        assertTrue("expected the muxer guard to refuse the job, got $failure", failure is IllegalArgumentException)
+        assertTrue(
+            "the refusal has to name the container it could not mux, got: ${failure?.message}",
+            failure?.message.orEmpty().contains("cannot mux") &&
+                failure?.message.orEmpty().contains(Container.WEBM.name),
+        )
+    }
+
+    private companion object {
+        /** Nothing is decoded or muxed on this path -- the guard refuses before any of that. */
+        const val TIMEOUT_MS = 10_000L
+    }
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.convert
+
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertFalse
+import org.junit.Assert.assertNull
+import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.Container
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.InputKind
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.InputProbe
+
+/**
+ * Which of the two probes wins, when they disagree.
+ *
+ * [MediaProbe.probe] runs `MediaExtractor` and FFprobe independently and then merges the two, and
+ * every rule in that merge is a decision. None of them had a test, for a reason that is structural
+ * rather than an oversight: `RemuxTest` drives the whole thing on a device against committed
+ * fixtures, but only ever with **one probe answering and the other agreeing or also failing**.
+ * Nothing on any source set can arrange for a real extractor and a real FFprobe to disagree, so
+ * every elvis in the merge was taken in one direction and never the other.
+ *
+ * Cutting `merge` out of `probe` is what makes the question askable. Both halves of its signature
+ * had to become `internal` for that -- `Extracted` already was, with a KDoc giving this exact
+ * reason; `FFprobeInfo` simply never got the same treatment.
+ */
+class MediaProbeMergeTest {
+
+    /**
+     * The rule with the loudest failure mode, and `isImageFormat`'s own KDoc names it: a false
+     * positive here "makes the source-info card describe a video as an image". So the image verdict
+     * has to beat a real video codec from the extractor, and the ordering that makes it do so is
+     * the first arm of `classify` rather than anything a reader would infer from the fields.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `an image verdict from FFprobe beats a video codec from the extractor`() {
+        val merged = MediaProbe.merge(
+            extracted = extracted(video = "h264"),
+            info = info(video = "mjpeg", isImage = true),
+        )
+
+        assertEquals(InputKind.IMAGE, merged.kind)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `the extractor wins on codecs, because it is the view the router will act on`() {
+        val merged = MediaProbe.merge(
+            extracted = extracted(video = "h264", audio = "aac"),
+            info = info(video = "hevc", audio = "mp3"),
+        )
+
+        assertEquals("h264", merged.videoCodec)
+        assertEquals("aac", merged.audioCodec)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `FFprobe answers for a file the extractor could not open`() {
+        val merged = MediaProbe.merge(extracted = null, info = info(video = "vp9", audio = "opus"))
+
+        assertEquals("vp9", merged.videoCodec)
+        assertEquals("opus", merged.audioCodec)
+        assertEquals(InputKind.VIDEO, merged.kind)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `the extractor answers for a file FFprobe could not read`() {
+        val merged = MediaProbe.merge(extracted = extracted(video = "h264", audio = "aac"), info = null)
+
+        assertEquals("h264", merged.videoCodec)
+        assertEquals("aac", merged.audioCodec)
+        assertNull("only FFprobe can name the container, so it stays unknown here", merged.container)
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The larger of the two, not the first non-zero.
+     *
+     * Either probe can report zero for a file the other times correctly, and a zero duration makes
+     * the FFmpeg progress percentage undefined -- `FFmpegEngine` divides by it. Both orderings are
+     * asserted because "take the extractor's" and "take the larger" agree in one direction and not
+     * the other, and only one of them is the rule.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `duration is the longer of the two readings, whichever probe supplied it`() {
+        assertEquals(
+            5_000L,
+            MediaProbe.merge(extracted(duration = 0L), info(duration = 5_000L)).durationMs,
+        )
+        assertEquals(
+            5_000L,
+            MediaProbe.merge(extracted(duration = 5_000L), info(duration = 0L)).durationMs,
+        )
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `dimensions come from the extractor, and from FFprobe only when it has none`() {
+        assertEquals(1920, MediaProbe.merge(extracted(width = 1920), info(width = 640)).width)
+        assertEquals(640, MediaProbe.merge(extracted = null, info = info(width = 640)).width)
+        assertEquals(0, MediaProbe.merge(extracted(width = 0), info(width = 0)).width)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `the container comes from FFprobe, which is the only probe that can name one`() {
+        val merged = MediaProbe.merge(extracted(video = "h264"), info(container = Container.MKV))
+
+        assertEquals(Container.MKV, merged.container)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a file with audio and no video is audio-only, not unparseable`() {
+        val merged = MediaProbe.merge(extracted(video = null, audio = "mp3"), info = null)
+
+        assertEquals(InputKind.AUDIO_ONLY, merged.kind)
+        assertFalse(merged.hasVideo)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a file neither probe could open is the one unreadable answer`() {
+        val merged = MediaProbe.merge(extracted = null, info = null)
+
+        assertEquals(MediaProbe.UNREADABLE, merged)
+        assertEquals(InputProbe.UNPARSEABLE, merged.videoCodec)
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The arm the ticket was filed for: parsed, and carrying no stream either probe recognised.
+     *
+     * Distinct from "neither probe could open it" -- here the extractor opened the file happily and
+     * found nothing convertible, which is what a container holding only subtitles looks like. It
+     * has to reach the same [MediaProbe.UNREADABLE] answer, because the router keys off that and
+     * there is nothing here for Media3 to do either way.
+     *
+     * Its input was already being built elsewhere in the suite -- `MediaProbeTrackWalkTest` calls
+     * `extractedFrom(emptyList())` and gets exactly this -- and had simply never been handed to the
+     * merge.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `a file that parsed but carries no recognised stream is unreadable too`() {
+        val merged = MediaProbe.merge(extracted = MediaProbe.extractedFrom(emptyList()), info = null)
+
+        assertEquals(InputKind.UNPARSEABLE, merged.kind)
+        assertEquals(MediaProbe.UNREADABLE, merged)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `hasVideo follows the codec that survived the merge, not either probe alone`() {
+        assertTrue(MediaProbe.merge(extracted(video = null), info(video = "vp9")).hasVideo)
+        assertFalse(MediaProbe.merge(extracted(video = null, audio = "aac"), info(video = null)).hasVideo)
+    }
+
+    private fun extracted(
+        video: String? = "h264",
+        audio: String? = "aac",
+        duration: Long = 1_000L,
+        width: Int = 1280,
+        height: Int = 720,
+    ) = MediaProbe.Extracted(video, audio, duration, width, height)
+
+    private fun info(
+        container: Container? = null,
+        video: String? = "h264",
+        audio: String? = "aac",
+        duration: Long = 1_000L,
+        width: Int = 1280,
+        height: Int = 720,
+        isImage: Boolean = false,
+    ) = MediaProbe.FFprobeInfo(container, video, audio, duration, width, height, isImage)
+}
@@ -232,6 +232,12 @@ class OutputPublisherPublishTest {
            RowShape.NO_SIZE_COLUMN to "a cursor with no SIZE column",
            RowShape.NULL_SIZE to "a cursor whose SIZE cell is null",
            RowShape.NO_ROWS to "a cursor holding no rows",
+            // The third case the KDoc names -- "a resolver call that throws" -- and the one the
+            // list was missing. It reaches `?: false` through `runCatching` rather than through a
+            // cursor answer, so it is the only one of the four that proves the catch is load
+            // bearing: a provider that revokes its grant between the picker and the write must not
+            // have its document deleted on the way out.
+            RowShape.QUERY_THROWS to "a provider that throws out of query",
        ).forEach { (shape, description) ->
            FakeSafProvider.deleteRequests.clear()
            FakeSafProvider.backingFile(documentUri).writeBytes(ByteArray(0))
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.convert
+
+import android.net.Uri
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertNull
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConcatPlanner
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConcatStrategy
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+
+/**
+ * A clip in a join that nothing could read, from the probe all the way to the strategy.
+ *
+ * Both halves of this are covered already, and separately: `MediaProbeTrackWalkTest` pins what
+ * `concatInputFrom` makes of a track list, and `ConcatPlannerTest`'s
+ * `an unknown codec is not treated as a match` pins what the planner does with a hand-built
+ * `ConcatInput(video = null)`. **Nothing spanned the two**, and the span is the load-bearing part:
+ * the planner's safety rests on the probe really producing that shape, and the hand-built fixture
+ * would go on passing if it stopped.
+ *
+ * Measured rather than asserted: mutating `concatInputFrom`'s initial `video` to a non-null
+ * placeholder leaves `ConcatPlannerTest` green and turns this red.
+ *
+ * ## The asymmetry this protects
+ *
+ * `ConcatPlanner` guards its video check against a null codec (`ConcatStrategy.kt:51`) and its
+ * audio check not at all (`:54`). **That is correct, not an oversight.** `MediaProbe.shortName`
+ * returns a non-null `String`, so in `concatInputFrom` a null `audioCodec` means the track is
+ * *absent* — and two clips with no audio genuinely do match. A null `videoCodec` carries both
+ * meanings, absent or unreadable, which is why only that one is guarded.
+ *
+ * So the audio check is safe *because* the video guard fires first on a clip nothing could read.
+ * Nothing wrote that coupling down and nothing held it.
+ *
+ * ## What this deliberately does not cover
+ *
+ * `probeForConcat`'s `catch` arm (`MediaProbe.kt:300-302`). It is **not reachable on the JVM**:
+ * Robolectric's `MediaExtractor` never throws from `setDataSource`, measured across an
+ * unregistered `content://` authority, a missing `file://`, a file of garbage bytes and an `http://`
+ * URL — all four returned normally with `trackCount = 0`. So the failure arrives here as an empty
+ * track list rather than as an exception, which reaches the same `ConcatInput(null, null, 0, 0, 0)`
+ * by the other road. The catch stays device-only, and this file does not pretend otherwise.
+ */
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class UnreadableJoinInputTest {
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a clip nothing could read probes as unknown, and an unknown clip is re-encoded`() {
+        val unreadable = MediaProbe.probeForConcat(RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication(), UNREADABLE)
+
+        assertNull("an unreadable clip proves nothing about its video codec", unreadable.videoCodec)
+        assertNull("nor about its audio codec", unreadable.audioCodec)
+        assertEquals("nor about its dimensions", 0, unreadable.width)
+        assertEquals(0, unreadable.height)
+        assertEquals(0, unreadable.frameRate)
+
+        assertEquals(
+            "a clip nothing could read is not evidence of a match with anything",
+            ConcatStrategy.REENCODE,
+            ConcatPlanner.plan(listOf(unreadable, unreadable)),
+        )
+    }
+
+    private companion object {
+        /** `content://` so the probe takes the SAF branch a real pick takes. Nothing answers it. */
+        val UNREADABLE: Uri = Uri.parse("content://test/vanished.mp4")
+    }
+}
@@ -166,6 +166,30 @@ class FFmpegCommandBuilderTest {
        assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.OPUS), "-c:a", "libopus")
    }

+    /**
+     * The arm most conversions actually take, and the only one in `audioArgs` with no test.
+     *
+     * `flac wav and opus select the right encoders` above covers the three named arms; MP3 has its
+     * own. AAC arrives through the `else`, so nothing named it and nothing pinned either half of
+     * what it emits -- neither `aac` nor `192k` appeared anywhere in this file. Both are shipped
+     * defaults: MP4 and M4A are the formats the picker offers first, so this is the audio
+     * every ordinary conversion gets.
+     *
+     * The bitrate is asserted as well as the encoder because it is the half a refactor is likelier
+     * to lose. An `-b:a` that quietly changed would not fail anything, would not look wrong in a
+     * command line, and would show up only as files that sound different from the ones the app
+     * produced last month.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `aac is the default encoder, at the bitrate the app ships`() {
+        assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.MP4_H264), "-c:a", "aac")
+        assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.MP4_H264), "-b:a", "192k")
+        // Through the `else` rather than through a named arm, so an AAC branch added above it later
+        // has to keep answering the same way.
+        assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.M4A_AAC), "-c:a", "aac")
+        assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.M4A_AAC), "-b:a", "192k")
+    }
+
    @Test
    fun `audio only formats never carry a video encoder`() {
        listOf(OutputFormat.MP3, OutputFormat.FLAC, OutputFormat.WAV, OutputFormat.OPUS)
@@ -451,6 +451,99 @@ class ContainerCapabilitiesTest {
        }
    }

+    /**
+     * The video twin of `no audio track is accepted by every container in both modes`.
+     *
+     * Dead in production today, and deliberately so: every caller guards `NONE` before asking the
+     * matrix, so nothing reaches this arm through the app. **The asymmetry is the argument, not the
+     * reachability** -- its audio counterpart at the top of the same `when` has had a dedicated
+     * test since #136, and one of a matched pair being covered is how a later reader concludes the
+     * other was considered and exempted. It was not; it was simply missed.
+     *
+     * Not the same shape as the two `COPY -> error(...)` arms, which `docs/coverage-read-findings.md`
+     * records as a named exemption (F4). Those are guards that must not be provokable. This is a
+     * documented answer -- "no video track fits anywhere" -- and an answer is a thing to pin.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `no video track is accepted by every container in both modes`() {
+        Container.entries.forEach { container ->
+            listOf(CodecMode.COPY, CodecMode.ENCODE).forEach { mode ->
+                assertTrue(
+                    "$container should accept no video track ($mode)",
+                    ContainerCapabilities.accepts(container, VideoCodec.NONE, mode),
+                )
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * A suggestion that keeps the codec the user asked for, rather than falling back to the
+     * container's first encodable one.
+     *
+     * `repairVideo`'s third arm -- "the request is not a copy, and this container can encode it" --
+     * is the one that preserves intent, and it was the only arm of the four nothing reached. The
+     * property test above executes `repairVideo` on every case it walks and lands elsewhere each
+     * time: an explicit COPY that works, a source the container can carry untouched, or no video
+     * track at all.
+     *
+     * The route is indirect because it is the only one the app has. VP9 into WebM is a perfectly
+     * good video request; what makes it invalid is the *audio* -- WebM carries Opus and Vorbis, not
+     * AAC. So `validateAudio` refuses, `suggestions` looks for a container that can hold what was
+     * asked for, and MP4 can encode VP9. The suggestion has to come back carrying VP9: swapping to
+     * the container's first encodable codec would discard the choice the user made.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `a repaired suggestion keeps the video codec the user chose`() {
+        val invalid = ContainerCapabilities.validate(
+            OutputSpec(Container.WEBM, VideoCodec.VP9, AudioCodec.AAC),
+            h264Source,
+        )
+
+        assertTrue("WebM cannot hold AAC, so this spec is invalid", invalid is Validation.Invalid)
+        val suggestions = (invalid as Validation.Invalid).suggestions
+        assertTrue(
+            "expected a suggestion that still encodes VP9, got $suggestions",
+            suggestions.any { it.videoCodec == VideoCodec.VP9 },
+        )
+        assertEverySuggestionValid(invalid, h264Source)
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The fallback in `firstContainerHolding`: when the input's own container cannot hold the
+     * codec the user asked for, any container that can will do.
+     *
+     * The preferred half -- "the container the input already uses" -- is what every other case
+     * reaches, because they all start from a file whose own container carries the codec in
+     * question. The elvis after it had never run.
+     *
+     * AVI is the input that makes it run: AVI predates H.265 and has no mapping for it, so asking
+     * an AVI for H.265 is refused, and the container the input already uses cannot be part of the
+     * answer. Without the fallback the only candidates left are AVI itself and the container
+     * holding the *source* codec -- also AVI -- so the refusal still offers something, but what it
+     * offers is H.264: the app quietly declines the codec the user asked for instead of moving them
+     * to a container that supports it.
+     *
+     * That is why this asserts the codec survives rather than that the list is non-empty. A
+     * non-empty assertion passes with the fallback deleted -- measured, not assumed.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `an input whose container cannot hold the requested codec is moved, not downgraded`() {
+        val aviSource = InputProbe(videoCodec = "h264", audioCodec = "aac", container = Container.AVI)
+
+        val invalid = ContainerCapabilities.validate(
+            OutputSpec(Container.AVI, VideoCodec.H265, AudioCodec.AAC),
+            aviSource,
+        )
+
+        assertTrue("AVI has no mapping for H.265", invalid is Validation.Invalid)
+        val suggestions = (invalid as Validation.Invalid).suggestions
+        assertTrue(
+            "expected a container that can actually hold H.265, got $suggestions",
+            suggestions.any { it.videoCodec == VideoCodec.H265 },
+        )
+        assertEverySuggestionValid(invalid, aviSource)
+    }
+
    @Test
    fun `resolving audio COPY before asking the matrix is required`() {
        // The audio twin of `resolving COPY before asking the matrix is required`, and the reason is
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ class TagTableUniquenessTest {
    fun `every tag constant has its own value`() {
        val tags = tagsIn(
            TestTags::class.java,
+            TestTags.Shell::class.java,
            TestTags.Converter::class.java,
            TestTags.Join::class.java,
        )
@@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.work
+
+import android.app.Application
+import android.net.Uri
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.Data
+import androidx.work.ListenableWorker
+import androidx.work.testing.TestListenableWorkerBuilder
+import androidx.work.workDataOf
+import kotlinx.coroutines.runBlocking
+import org.junit.After
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertFalse
+import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
+import org.junit.Before
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConcatJoiner
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConversionDependencies
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.StagingNames
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.installTestWorkManager
+import org.libremediaconverter.ffmpeg.ConcatEngine
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConcatStrategy
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.OutputFormat
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+import java.io.File
+import java.util.UUID
+
+/**
+ * What a join does when the engine fails partway.
+ *
+ * Everything past `ConcatWorker`'s `setForeground` was untested on **every** source set, and the
+ * repo had already measured the cost: `PerJobStagingTest`'s KDoc records that reverting
+ * `ConcatWorker` to a constant staging name left all 257 tests green, because nothing in the JVM
+ * suite can get past a `ConcatEngine` constructed in place. `RefusedJobTest` says the same from the
+ * other side -- "the next thing past the count guard is `ConcatEngine`, which is native".
+ * `ConcatEngineTest` on a device tests the engine directly, bypassing the worker, and
+ * `ConcatWorkerTest` covers only the too-few-inputs guard and the happy path.
+ *
+ * `ConversionDependencies.concat` is the seam that closes it, added here to sit beside the
+ * `.hardware` and `.software` that `ConversionWorker` has had all along -- the asymmetry between the
+ * two workers was the whole reason one of them had a tested failure path and the other did not.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class ConcatFailureTest {
+
+    private lateinit var app: Application
+    private lateinit var publisher: AlwaysRoomPublisher
+
+    @Before
+    fun setUp() {
+        app = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+        publisher = AlwaysRoomPublisher(app)
+        ConversionDependencies.publisher = { publisher }
+        installTestWorkManager(app, Data.EMPTY)
+    }
+
+    @After
+    fun tearDown() {
+        ConversionDependencies.reset()
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a join whose engine fails reports the engine's own reason`() {
+        ConversionDependencies.concat = { FailingJoiner { error(DEMUXER_MESSAGE) } }
+
+        val result = runBlocking { joinWorker().doWork() }
+
+        assertEquals(
+            ListenableWorker.Result.failure(workDataOf(ConcatWorker.KEY_ERROR to DEMUXER_MESSAGE)),
+            result,
+        )
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * A failure carrying no message at all, which Kotlin and Java both allow and FFmpegKit's
+     * wrappers can produce.
+     *
+     * Without the fallback the user is shown an empty error, and `JoinViewModel` cannot tell that
+     * from a job that reported nothing -- the two would be one blank screen with different causes.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `a failure with no message of its own still says something`() {
+        ConversionDependencies.concat = { FailingJoiner { throw RuntimeException() } }
+
+        val result = runBlocking { joinWorker().doWork() }
+
+        assertEquals(
+            ListenableWorker.Result.failure(
+                workDataOf(ConcatWorker.KEY_ERROR to ConcatWorker.GENERIC_FAILURE_MESSAGE),
+            ),
+            result,
+        )
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The staged file is deleted on the way out.
+     *
+     * The joiner writes before it fails, exactly as `PartialThenFailingTranscoder` does on the
+     * conversion side: a stub that only threw would let a missing `staged.delete()` pass. What it
+     * costs to lose is a full-size partial per failed join, sitting in cache until the sweep is old
+     * enough to be sure nobody is coming back for it.
+     *
+     * Asserted against the file the joiner was actually handed rather than by scanning the staging
+     * directory for a name. The first draft did scan, for a `"join-"` prefix that
+     * `StagingNames.forJob` does not produce -- it names files `<jobId>.<ext>` -- so the assertion
+     * was trivially true and the mutation walked straight through it.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `a failed join leaves nothing behind in staging`() {
+        val joiner = FailingJoiner { error(DEMUXER_MESSAGE) }
+        ConversionDependencies.concat = { joiner }
+
+        runBlocking { joinWorker().doWork() }
+
+        val staged = requireNotNull(joiner.lastOutput) { "the joiner never ran, so this proves nothing" }
+        assertEquals(
+            "the fixture has to write before it fails, or the delete is unobservable",
+            PARTIAL_BYTES,
+            joiner.bytesWritten,
+        )
+        assertFalse("a failed join must not leave its partial behind: $staged", staged.exists())
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The success path, and the staging name #159's fixture and `PerJobStagingTest` both care about.
+     *
+     * Worth its place rather than a happy-path formality: `PerJobStagingTest`'s KDoc records that
+     * **reverting `ConcatWorker` to a constant staging name left all 257 tests green**, because
+     * nothing could reach the line that names the file. This is the test that was missing when that
+     * was written -- the join's output `Data` had never been read by anything on the JVM.
+     *
+     * The staged path is asserted to carry the job id, not a constant: two joins of the same format
+     * sharing one name is the defect, and `ConcatEngine`'s list file collided harder still.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `a join that works reports its own staged file, strategy and name`() {
+        val joiner = SucceedingJoiner()
+        ConversionDependencies.concat = { joiner }
+
+        val result = runBlocking { joinWorker().doWork() }
+
+        assertTrue("got $result", result is ListenableWorker.Result.Success)
+        val data = (result as ListenableWorker.Result.Success).outputData
+        assertEquals(
+            "the staged file has to be this job's, not a name every join shares",
+            File(publisherStagingDir(), StagingNames.forJob(JOB_ID, OutputFormat.MP4_H264.extension)).absolutePath,
+            data.getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_OUTPUT_PATH),
+        )
+        assertEquals(ConcatStrategy.STREAM_COPY.name, data.getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_STRATEGY))
+        assertEquals(OutputFormat.MP4_H264.mimeType, data.getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_MIME_TYPE))
+        assertTrue(
+            "the save dialog needs a name with the right extension, got ${data.getString(
+                ConcatWorker.KEY_SUGGESTED_NAME,
+            )}",
+            data.getString(ConcatWorker.KEY_SUGGESTED_NAME).orEmpty().endsWith(".${OutputFormat.MP4_H264.extension}"),
+        )
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The arm beside the count guard: no URI array at all.
+     *
+     * Covered today only by `UnopenableUriTest` on a device, although it runs before staging and
+     * before any native code. It is the exact sibling of `RefusedJobTest`'s ConversionWorker twin,
+     * and it belongs on the JVM with it -- a device test for a branch that needs no device is a
+     * slower test that reports later.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `a join with no input array at all is refused with a message`() {
+        val result = runBlocking {
+            TestListenableWorkerBuilder<ConcatWorker>(
+                context = app,
+                inputData = workDataOf(ConcatWorker.KEY_FORMAT to OutputFormat.MP4_H264.name),
+                runAttemptCount = 0,
+            ).setId(JOB_ID).build().doWork()
+        }
+
+        assertEquals(
+            ListenableWorker.Result.failure(workDataOf(ConcatWorker.KEY_ERROR to ConcatWorker.NO_INPUTS_MESSAGE)),
+            result,
+        )
+    }
+
+    private fun publisherStagingDir(): File? = publisher.createStagingFile("probe").parentFile
+
+    private fun joinWorker(): ConcatWorker = TestListenableWorkerBuilder<ConcatWorker>(
+        context = app,
+        inputData = workDataOf(
+            ConcatWorker.KEY_INPUT_URIS to arrayOf(FIRST.toString(), SECOND.toString()),
+            ConcatWorker.KEY_TOTAL_BYTES to TOTAL_BYTES,
+            ConcatWorker.KEY_FORMAT to OutputFormat.MP4_H264.name,
+        ),
+        runAttemptCount = 0,
+    ).setId(JOB_ID).build()
+
+    private companion object {
+        val FIRST: Uri = Uri.parse("file:///tmp/one.mp4")
+        val SECOND: Uri = Uri.parse("file:///tmp/two.mp4")
+        const val TOTAL_BYTES = 2048L
+        const val DEMUXER_MESSAGE = "the demuxer rejected the input list"
+        const val PARTIAL_BYTES = 2048
+        val JOB_ID: UUID = UUID.fromString("00000000-0000-4000-8000-00000000000b")
+    }
+}
+
+/** A joiner that writes something and then fails, so a missing `staged.delete()` cannot pass. */
+private class FailingJoiner(private val failure: () -> Nothing) : ConcatJoiner {
+
+    /** The handle the worker created, kept so a test can ask whether it survived the failure. */
+    var lastOutput: File? = null
+    var bytesWritten = 0
+
+    override suspend fun join(inputs: List<Uri>, output: File, format: OutputFormat): ConcatEngine.Result {
+        lastOutput = output
+        output.writeBytes(ByteArray(PARTIAL_BYTES))
+        bytesWritten = PARTIAL_BYTES
+        failure()
+    }
+
+    private companion object {
+        const val PARTIAL_BYTES = 2048
+    }
+}
+
+/** The joiner that finishes, so the success path and the output `Data` can be read on the JVM. */
+private class SucceedingJoiner : ConcatJoiner {
+    override suspend fun join(inputs: List<Uri>, output: File, format: OutputFormat): ConcatEngine.Result {
+        output.writeBytes(ByteArray(OUTPUT_BYTES))
+        return ConcatEngine.Result(ConcatStrategy.STREAM_COPY, output)
+    }
+
+    private companion object {
+        const val OUTPUT_BYTES = 4096
+    }
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.work
+
+import android.content.pm.ServiceInfo
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.annotation.Config
+
+/**
+ * [ConversionForegroundType.current] answers differently on each of the three API regimes, and
+ * until this file only one of them was ever executed.
+ *
+ * `app/src/test/resources/robolectric.properties` pins the whole JVM suite to `sdk=36`, so every
+ * Robolectric test that reaches a `ForegroundInfo` takes the `mediaProcessing` arm and no other.
+ * The 33 and 34 arms were cold: 3 lines and 3 of 4 branches, measured on `main` at `d354f64`.
+ *
+ * **The instrumented test is not a substitute, and the reason is specific.**
+ * `ConversionWorkerTest.foregroundTypeMatchesTheRunningApiLevel` asserts against whichever API the
+ * leg happens to be — one arm per leg, never the other two — and the legs that would cover 33 and
+ * 34 are the ones issue #122 wedges. `docs/coverage-read-findings.md` records an API 33 run that
+ * reported `received: 60` and `failed: unknown`: the regime *was* exercised, and that leg could
+ * not have said so if it had broken. Four `@Config` classes here pin all three arms
+ * deterministically, in the same `./gradlew` invocation as everything else.
+ *
+ * `minSdk` is 33, so none of these is dead code — each is a device someone is running the app on.
+ *
+ * **SDK 35 is in the list for the boundary, not for the answer.** It shares its answer with 36,
+ * which would make it look redundant. It is not: relaxing `>= VANILLA_ICE_CREAM` to `>` is invisible
+ * at every level except exactly 35, so without this class that mutation survives the suite.
+ */
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+@Config(sdk = [33])
+class ForegroundTypeApi33Test {
+
+    /**
+     * Zero rather than a named constant because there is no constant to name: API 33 does not
+     * require a type, and `mediaProcessing` does not exist here to pass. `ForegroundInfo` reads 0
+     * as "no type at all", which is what this regime wants.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `api 33 asks for no foreground service type`() {
+        assertEquals(0, ConversionForegroundType.current())
+    }
+}
+
+/**
+ * API 34 makes a type mandatory and still has no `mediaProcessing`, so `dataSync` is the only
+ * sensible fit. See [ForegroundTypeApi33Test] for why this file exists.
+ */
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+@Config(sdk = [34])
+class ForegroundTypeApi34Test {
+
+    @Test
+    fun `api 34 falls back to dataSync, the only type that fits`() {
+        assertEquals(ServiceInfo.FOREGROUND_SERVICE_TYPE_DATA_SYNC, ConversionForegroundType.current())
+    }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The first level with `mediaProcessing`, and therefore the one that tells `>=` from `>`.
+ * See [ForegroundTypeApi33Test].
+ */
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+@Config(sdk = [35])
+class ForegroundTypeApi35Test {
+
+    @Test
+    fun `api 35 is the first level that takes mediaProcessing`() {
+        assertEquals(ServiceInfo.FOREGROUND_SERVICE_TYPE_MEDIA_PROCESSING, ConversionForegroundType.current())
+    }
+}
+
+/**
+ * The level the rest of the suite runs at, asserted here rather than assumed — it is the one arm
+ * that was already covered, and leaving it out would make this file look like it is about the old
+ * levels rather than about all three regimes. See [ForegroundTypeApi33Test].
+ */
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+@Config(sdk = [36])
+class ForegroundTypeApi36Test {
+
+    @Test
+    fun `api 36 keeps mediaProcessing`() {
+        assertEquals(ServiceInfo.FOREGROUND_SERVICE_TYPE_MEDIA_PROCESSING, ConversionForegroundType.current())
+    }
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.work
+
+import android.app.Application
+import android.net.Uri
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.Data
+import androidx.work.ListenableWorker
+import androidx.work.testing.TestListenableWorkerBuilder
+import kotlinx.coroutines.CancellationException
+import kotlinx.coroutines.runBlocking
+import org.junit.After
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertFalse
+import org.junit.Assert.assertThrows
+import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
+import org.junit.Before
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConversionDependencies
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.HardwareTranscoder
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.SoftwareTranscoder
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.installTestWorkManager
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.Container
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.ConversionRequest
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.DeviceCodecs
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.EnginePreference
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.InputProbe
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.OutputFormat
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+import java.io.File
+import java.util.UUID
+
+/**
+ * What happens when the hardware engine does not finish the job.
+ *
+ * `runMedia3OrFallBack` was eleven lines at 0% on the JVM and `isCancellation` had never been
+ * called by any unit test at all. Its own KDoc calls the fallback the protection against vendor
+ * hardware encoders that "cannot be tested for correctness", so it is the branch most likely to
+ * matter on a device nobody here owns — and it was reachable the whole time through
+ * `ConversionDependencies.hardware`, which no unit test had ever used.
+ *
+ * The sharp one is cancellation. `runMedia3OrFallBack` catches `Throwable`, so without the
+ * `isCancellation` re-throw a user cancelling a hardware transcode would have the app quietly
+ * start a *second* conversion in software — the one thing cancelling is supposed to prevent.
+ *
+ * `ForcedFailureTest` covers the failure half on a device. It does not cover the cancellation half,
+ * and this host cannot run it either way.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class HardwareFallbackTest {
+
+    private lateinit var app: Application
+    private lateinit var hardware: RecordingHardwareTranscoder
+    private lateinit var software: RecordingSoftwareTranscoder
+
+    @Before
+    fun setUp() {
+        app = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+        hardware = RecordingHardwareTranscoder()
+        software = RecordingSoftwareTranscoder()
+        ConversionDependencies.publisher = { AlwaysRoomPublisher(app) }
+        ConversionDependencies.hardware = { hardware }
+        ConversionDependencies.software = { software }
+        // A probe with real codecs, not the default: `InputProbe()` reports UNPARSEABLE, which
+        // PERMISSIVE.canDecode refuses, and the router would send every job here straight to
+        // FFmpeg without any of these tests mentioning why.
+        ConversionDependencies.probe = { _, _ -> H264_SOURCE }
+        ConversionDependencies.deviceCodecs = { DeviceCodecs.PERMISSIVE }
+        installTestWorkManager(app, Data.EMPTY)
+    }
+
+    @After
+    fun tearDown() {
+        ConversionDependencies.reset()
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a hardware failure runs the job again in software, on a clean staging file`() {
+        hardware.failWith = { error("the vendor encoder produced nothing usable") }
+
+        val result = runBlocking { worker().doWork() }
+
+        assertTrue("the job should still succeed, got $result", result is ListenableWorker.Result.Success)
+        assertEquals("the hardware engine gets exactly one attempt", 1, hardware.attempts)
+        assertEquals("and the job then goes to software", 1, software.attempts)
+        // The `staged.delete()` between the two, asserted where it is observable: FFmpeg must not
+        // find a half-written hardware output sitting at the path it is about to write.
+        assertFalse(
+            "the partial hardware output must be gone before FFmpeg starts",
+            software.outputExistedOnEntry,
+        )
+        assertEquals("the hardware engine is closed either way", 1, hardware.closes)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a cancelled hardware transcode is not quietly retried in software`() {
+        hardware.failWith = { throw CancellationException("the user pressed Cancel") }
+
+        assertThrows(CancellationException::class.java) { runBlocking { worker().doWork() } }
+
+        assertEquals("the hardware engine ran", 1, hardware.attempts)
+        assertEquals(
+            "cancelling must not start a second conversion -- that is the whole point of cancelling",
+            0,
+            software.attempts,
+        )
+        assertEquals("and the engine is still closed on the way out", 1, hardware.closes)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a hardware transcode that works never reaches the software engine`() {
+        val result = runBlocking { worker().doWork() }
+
+        assertTrue("got $result", result is ListenableWorker.Result.Success)
+        assertEquals(1, hardware.attempts)
+        assertEquals("the fallback is a fallback, not a second pass", 0, software.attempts)
+        assertEquals(1, hardware.closes)
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * #169: the display-name fallback, which reaches further than the notification title.
+     *
+     * `inputData.getString(KEY_DISPLAY_NAME) ?: "input"` had never taken its right-hand side. The
+     * value is not only the foreground notification's title: it feeds `outputNameFor`, so it is
+     * also the filename offered in the user's save dialog. A job enqueued by an older build, or
+     * built by hand, carries no such key.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `a job that names no input file still suggests an output name`() {
+        val result = runBlocking { worker(displayName = null).doWork() }
+
+        assertTrue("got $result", result is ListenableWorker.Result.Success)
+        val suggested = (result as ListenableWorker.Result.Success)
+            .outputData.getString(ConversionWorker.KEY_SUGGESTED_NAME)
+        assertTrue(
+            "expected a name built from the fallback, got $suggested",
+            suggested.orEmpty().startsWith("input"),
+        )
+    }
+
+    private fun worker(displayName: String? = DISPLAY_NAME): ConversionWorker {
+        val spec = OutputFormat.MP4_H265.spec
+        val entries = buildMap<String, Any> {
+            put(ConversionWorker.KEY_INPUT_URI, INPUT.toString())
+            displayName?.let { put(ConversionWorker.KEY_DISPLAY_NAME, it) }
+            put(ConversionWorker.KEY_SIZE_BYTES, INPUT_BYTES)
+            put(ConversionWorker.KEY_CONTAINER, spec.container.name)
+            put(ConversionWorker.KEY_VIDEO_CODEC, spec.videoCodec.name)
+            put(ConversionWorker.KEY_AUDIO_CODEC, spec.audioCodec.name)
+            // AUTO rather than FORCE_SOFTWARE, which is what every other worker test uses and is
+            // exactly why this path had no coverage: forcing software never enters the function.
+            put(ConversionWorker.KEY_ENGINE_PREFERENCE, EnginePreference.AUTO.name)
+        }
+        return TestListenableWorkerBuilder<ConversionWorker>(
+            context = app,
+            inputData = Data.Builder().putAll(entries).build(),
+            runAttemptCount = 0,
+        ).setId(JOB_ID).build()
+    }
+
+    private companion object {
+        val INPUT: Uri = Uri.parse("file:///tmp/holiday.mp4")
+        const val DISPLAY_NAME = "holiday.mp4"
+        const val INPUT_BYTES = 1024L
+        val JOB_ID: UUID = UUID.fromString("00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000009")
+        val H264_SOURCE = InputProbe(
+            videoCodec = "h264",
+            audioCodec = "aac",
+            container = Container.MP4,
+            durationMs = 1_000,
+        )
+    }
+}
+
+/**
+ * A hardware engine that writes something before it fails, and remembers being closed.
+ *
+ * Writing first is the point, exactly as it is for `PartialThenFailingTranscoder`: an engine that
+ * only threw would let a missing `staged.delete()` pass unnoticed.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+private class RecordingHardwareTranscoder : HardwareTranscoder {
+
+    var attempts = 0
+    var closes = 0
+    var failWith: (() -> Unit)? = null
+
+    override suspend fun transcode(input: Uri, output: File, request: ConversionRequest, onProgress: (Int) -> Unit) {
+        attempts++
+        output.writeBytes(ByteArray(PARTIAL_BYTES))
+        failWith?.invoke()
+    }
+
+    override fun close() {
+        closes++
+    }
+
+    private companion object {
+        const val PARTIAL_BYTES = 2048
+    }
+}
+
+/** The software engine, recording whether the hardware attempt's leftovers were cleared first. */
+private class RecordingSoftwareTranscoder : SoftwareTranscoder {
+
+    var attempts = 0
+    var outputExistedOnEntry = false
+
+    override suspend fun run(
+        request: ConversionRequest,
+        inputPath: String,
+        output: File,
+        durationMs: Long,
+        onProgress: (Int) -> Unit,
+    ) {
+        attempts++
+        outputExistedOnEntry = output.exists()
+        output.writeBytes(ByteArray(OUTPUT_BYTES))
+    }
+
+    private companion object {
+        const val OUTPUT_BYTES = 512
+    }
+}
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ import androidx.work.testing.WorkManagerTestInitHelper
 import androidx.work.workDataOf
 import kotlinx.coroutines.runBlocking
 import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertFalse
 import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
 import org.junit.Before
 import org.junit.Test
@@ -125,6 +126,39 @@ class JobSnapshotsTest {
        assertEquals(newer.absolutePath, Reattachment.choose(snapshots)?.job?.outputPath)
    }

+    /**
+     * A job in the tag query that never recorded an output path at all.
+     *
+     * Distinct from the three cases above, which all *have* a path and differ in what it names. A
+     * job still running, or one that finished without writing its result key, carries no path at
+     * all -- and `getWorkInfosByTagFlow` returns it alongside the finished ones, because the tag is
+     * the worker class and every attempt ever enqueued carries it.
+     *
+     * The guard is the `?.` in `path?.let(::File)`. Without it the null goes straight into a `File`
+     * constructor. What this pins is the consequence rather than the null check: such a job must
+     * not be offered as a result, so `Reattachment.choose` has to walk past it to the job that
+     * really produced a file. Choosing it would put a Converted screen in front of the user with a
+     * Save button that has nothing to save.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `a job that recorded no output path is not offered as a result`() {
+        val real = stagedFile("real.mp4", bytes = 4096)
+        finishedWithOutput(real)
+        finishedWithNoOutput()
+
+        val snapshots = snapshots()
+
+        assertEquals("both jobs carry the tag, so both come back", 2, snapshots.size)
+        val silent = snapshots.single { it.outputPath == null }
+        assertFalse("no path means no output, not an empty one", silent.outputExists)
+        assertEquals("and no time either, for the same reason", 0L, silent.outputModifiedAt)
+        assertEquals(
+            "the reattachment has to walk past it to the job that really produced a file",
+            real.absolutePath,
+            Reattachment.choose(snapshots)?.job?.outputPath,
+        )
+    }
+
    private fun snapshots(): List<JobSnapshot> = runBlocking {
        workManager.jobSnapshots(
            tag = ConversionWorker::class.java.name,
@@ -152,6 +186,11 @@ class JobSnapshotsTest {
        ).result.get()
    }

+    /** A job that carries the tag and no result key -- still running, or finished without one. */
+    private fun finishedWithNoOutput() {
+        workManager.enqueue(OneTimeWorkRequestBuilder<ConversionWorker>().build()).result.get()
+    }
+
    private companion object {
        /** Two fixed moments a day apart, so the ordering is stated rather than raced for. */
        const val OLDER_MS = 1_700_000_000_000L
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.work
+
+import android.app.Notification
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.Data
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertNotEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
+import org.junit.Before
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.installTestWorkManager
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+import java.util.UUID
+
+/**
+ * The two things a progress notification can say, and that they are not the same thing.
+ *
+ * An assertion gap rather than a coverage one, and the distinction is the reason this file exists.
+ * JaCoCo is green on `build`'s `if (indeterminate)`, because `ProgressNotificationTest` drives it
+ * through a real worker -- but that test reads only the notification id and
+ * `Notification.EXTRA_PROGRESS`. **Nothing had ever read the text.** Swapping the two branches, or
+ * collapsing them into one string, passed the entire suite.
+ *
+ * What it costs to get wrong is small and constant: a conversion that has been running for four
+ * minutes still saying "Preparing", or one that has not started reporting yet claiming 0%. Neither
+ * is a crash, and neither would be found by anything else here -- which is exactly the kind of
+ * thing that survives for a long time.
+ *
+ * Nothing else in the suite constructs [ConversionNotifications] directly.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class NotificationProgressTextTest {
+
+    /**
+     * `build` reaches `WorkManager.getInstance` for the Cancel action's PendingIntent, so the
+     * notification cannot be built at all without one. That coupling is why nothing had ever
+     * constructed this class directly and read what it produced.
+     */
+    @Before
+    fun setUp() {
+        installTestWorkManager(RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication(), Data.EMPTY)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `an indeterminate notification says something different from a measured one`() {
+        val context = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+        val notifications = ConversionNotifications(context)
+
+        val preparing = notifications.build(JOB_ID, TITLE, percent = 0, indeterminate = true).text()
+        val measured = notifications.build(JOB_ID, TITLE, percent = 42, indeterminate = false).text()
+
+        assertNotEquals(
+            "the two states have to read differently, or the text says nothing at all",
+            preparing,
+            measured,
+        )
+        assertTrue(
+            "a measured notification has to carry its percentage, got \"$measured\"",
+            measured.contains("42"),
+        )
+        assertTrue(
+            "an indeterminate one must not invent one, got \"$preparing\"",
+            !preparing.contains("42") && !preparing.contains("0"),
+        )
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The title is the caller's, not the builder's -- it is the file the user picked, and it is what
+     * tells two simultaneous conversions apart in the shade.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `the notification is titled with the file it is converting`() {
+        val context = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+
+        val built = ConversionNotifications(context).build(JOB_ID, TITLE, percent = 10)
+
+        assertEquals(TITLE, built.extras.getString(Notification.EXTRA_TITLE))
+    }
+
+    private fun Notification.text(): String = extras.getString(Notification.EXTRA_TEXT).orEmpty()
+
+    private companion object {
+        const val TITLE = "holiday.mp4"
+        val JOB_ID: UUID = UUID.fromString("00000000-0000-4000-8000-00000000000a")
+    }
+}