probe() runs MediaExtractor and FFprobe independently and merges the two, and every rule
in that merge is a decision nothing held. The reason is structural rather than an
oversight: RemuxTest drives the whole thing on a device against committed fixtures, but
only ever with one probe answering and the other agreeing or also failing. Nothing on any
source set can arrange for a real extractor and a real FFprobe to *disagree*, so every
elvis in the merge was taken in one direction and never the other.
The seam is `internal fun merge(Extracted?, FFprobeInfo?): InputProbe`, pulled out of
probe() whole -- probe() now reads the two probes, merges, and keeps the log. FFprobeInfo
becomes internal alongside it; Extracted already was, with a KDoc giving this exact reason,
and FFprobeInfo simply never got the same treatment. Half a signature being private is
what made the function unnameable from a test.
Eleven tests, and the mutations that hold them:
image beats a real video codec demote the isImage arm below the video arm
the extractor wins on codecs flip the elvis to FFprobe-first
duration is the larger reading replace maxOf with extractor-first
dimensions prefer the extractor flip the width elvis
no recognised stream is unreadable narrow the guard to `extracted == null && info == null`
All five red, then restored. One mutation I tried first was *semantically equivalent* --
moving the image arm above the both-null arm changes nothing for any reachable input -- so
it stayed green and is recorded here rather than counted: a green mutation is only evidence
when the mutation is a real change.
The last row is the arm the ticket was filed for: parsed, and carrying no stream either
probe recognised, which is what a container holding only subtitles looks like. Its input
was already being constructed elsewhere in the suite -- MediaProbeTrackWalkTest calls
extractedFrom(emptyList()) and gets exactly it -- and had never been handed to the merge.
568 -> 579 JVM tests, 0 failures.
MediaProbe: 35 -> 24 missed lines, 72 -> 40 missed branches.
Line 2103/2348 -> 2173/2348; branch 1029/1340 -> 1091/1342.
The branch denominator moved by two, and it is the seam that moved it -- worth stating
separately from the numerator, because CLAUDE.md's coverage entry has a documented history
of explaining its own numbers wrongly.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two assertion gaps, not coverage gaps, which is why they lasted. AppRootRestorationTest
already drives AppRoot at Compact and Expanded, so JaCoCo is green on useRail -- but it
asserts only that the selected tab survives recreation, through a stub `content`
composable. Nothing anywhere queried for a rail or a bar, and nothing composed the real
screens. Measured before this file existed:
- transposing the NavigationRail and NavigationBar bodies passed the entire suite
- transposing Content's two arms passed it too
A tablet showing phone chrome, or the Convert tab opening the Join screen, and 546 tests
with nothing to say about either. AppRoot's own KDoc is why that matters more than it
looks: from targetSdk 37 the app is resized and rotated whether or not it is ready, so the
width class is not a preference.
WindowWidthSizeClass.Medium appears in no test in either source set today. useRail is
`!= Compact`, so Medium takes the rail; narrowing it to `== Expanded` is one character and
breaks every tablet and unfolded foldable. That mutation is red now, and it is red only
because of the Medium test -- the Compact and Expanded ones both survive it.
Two things this needed:
**createAndroidComposeRule rather than createComposeRule.** Rendering AppRoot with its
default content reaches ConverterScreen's `viewModel = viewModel()`, which needs a
ViewModelStoreOwner. It works because both ViewModels are
`@JvmOverloads constructor(app: Application, ...)` so AndroidViewModelFactory can build
them, and because ui-test-manifest's debugImplementation entry already puts a
ComponentActivity in the merged manifest the unit tests build against -- which
app/build.gradle.kts says in terms. Checked with a throwaway spike before the ticket was
filed, rather than discovered here.
**Two tags, applied inside main.** The only production change: TestTags.Shell, set on the
rail and the bar. There is no other way to tell the two apart -- both render the same two
destinations with the same labels and the same selection state, so any assertion writable
without them is satisfied by either layout. In TestTags and applied by the shell rather
than handed down by the test, for the reason that file's KDoc gives: a tag the test
supplies proves only that the test set it. TagTableUniquenessTest covers the new group.
564 -> 568 JVM tests, 0 failures.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
audioArgs has six arms. Five are named codecs with tests; AAC arrives through the `else`,
so nothing named it -- neither "aac" nor "192k" appeared anywhere in
FFmpegCommandBuilderTest. It is the audio MP4 and M4A get, which is to say the audio the
picker offers first and most conversions produce.
Both halves are asserted, and the bitrate is the half worth arguing for: an -b:a that
quietly changed would fail nothing, look wrong in no command line, and surface only as
files that sound different from the ones the app produced last month. Both mutations
confirmed red -- 192k -> 128k and aac -> libfdk_aac.
Asserted through MP4_H264 and M4A_AAC rather than one of them, so an AAC arm added above
the `else` later has to keep answering the same way for both.
**Deliberately not added here: an ENCODABLE_AUDIO-vs-audioArgs agreement test**, the
obvious companion to VideoCodecMimeAgreementTest. It would freeze the answer to F1, which
is open: ContainerCapabilities.kt:84 says "nothing here emits a Vorbis encoder" and
FFmpegCommandBuilder.kt:188 does. docs/coverage-read-findings.md says in terms that the
tempting fix there locks in the wrong answer and that the decision comes first. This is
the AAC arm only.
563 -> 564 JVM tests, 0 failures. No production code changed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
JMR-devandClaude Opus 5