app/src/main/java/org/libremediaconverter/MainActivity.kt

@@ -24,9 +24,11 @@ import androidx.compose.runtime.saveable.Saver
 import androidx.compose.runtime.saveable.rememberSaveable
 import androidx.compose.runtime.setValue
 import androidx.compose.ui.Modifier
+import androidx.compose.ui.platform.testTag
 import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
 import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConverterScreen
 import org.libremediaconverter.join.JoinScreen
+import org.libremediaconverter.ui.TestTags
 import org.libremediaconverter.ui.theme.LibreMediaConverterTheme
 
 /**
@@ -114,7 +116,7 @@ internal fun AppRoot(
 
     if (useRail) {
         Row(modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize()) {
-            NavigationRail {
+            NavigationRail(modifier = Modifier.testTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL)) {
                 Destination.entries.forEach { item ->
                     NavigationRailItem(
                         selected = destination == item,
@@ -132,7 +134,7 @@ internal fun AppRoot(
         Scaffold(
             modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize(),
             bottomBar = {
-                NavigationBar {
+                NavigationBar(modifier = Modifier.testTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR)) {
                     Destination.entries.forEach { item ->
                         NavigationBarItem(
                             selected = destination == item,

app/src/main/java/org/libremediaconverter/ui/TestTags.kt

@@ -56,6 +56,20 @@ object TestTags {
      */
     const val RETRY_SAVE: String = "action.retrySave"
 
+    /**
+     * The adaptive shell around both screens -- `AppRoot`'s two layouts.
+     *
+     * Named because there is no other way to tell them apart from a test. Both render the same two
+     * destinations with the same labels and the same selection state, so every assertion that could
+     * be written without these tags is satisfied by either layout, and transposing the two bodies
+     * passed the whole suite. Exactly one of the two exists at a time, which is what makes
+     * `assertExists` / `assertDoesNotExist` on this pair a statement about the width class.
+     */
+    object Shell {
+        const val NAVIGATION_RAIL: String = "shell.navigationRail"
+        const val NAVIGATION_BAR: String = "shell.navigationBar"
+    }
+
     /** `ConverterScreen`. */
     object Converter {
         const val CHOOSE_FILE: String = "converter.chooseFile"

app/src/test/java/org/libremediaconverter/AdaptiveShellTest.kt

@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter
+
+import androidx.activity.ComponentActivity
+import androidx.compose.material3.windowsizeclass.WindowWidthSizeClass
+import androidx.compose.ui.test.junit4.v2.createAndroidComposeRule
+import androidx.compose.ui.test.onNodeWithTag
+import androidx.compose.ui.test.onNodeWithText
+import androidx.compose.ui.test.performClick
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.Data
+import org.junit.After
+import org.junit.Before
+import org.junit.Rule
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConversionDependencies
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.installTestWorkManager
+import org.libremediaconverter.model.InputProbe
+import org.libremediaconverter.ui.TestTags
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+
+/**
+ * Which navigation affordance the shell actually renders, and which screen it actually shows.
+ *
+ * Assertion gaps rather than coverage gaps, both of them, and that is why they lasted.
+ * `AppRootRestorationTest` already drives `AppRoot` at `Compact` and `Expanded`, so JaCoCo is green
+ * on `useRail` -- but it asserts only that the *selected tab* survives recreation, through a stub
+ * `content` composable. Nothing anywhere queried for a rail or a bar, and nothing rendered the real
+ * screens. Two consequences, both measured before this file existed:
+ *
+ * - **Transposing the `NavigationRail` and `NavigationBar` bodies passed the entire suite.**
+ * - **Transposing `Content`'s two arms passed it too** -- a tablet showing the phone chrome, or the
+ *   Convert tab opening the Join screen, and 546 tests with nothing to say about either.
+ *
+ * `AppRoot`'s own KDoc is why this matters more than it looks: from targetSdk 37 the app is resized
+ * and rotated whether or not it is ready, so the width class is not a preference, it is whatever
+ * the system hands over.
+ *
+ * ## Two things this needed that the rest of the suite does not
+ *
+ * **`createAndroidComposeRule`, not `createComposeRule`.** Rendering `AppRoot` with its *default*
+ * content reaches `ConverterScreen`'s `viewModel = viewModel()`, which needs a
+ * `ViewModelStoreOwner`; the plain rule supplies none. It works because both ViewModels are
+ * `@JvmOverloads constructor(app: Application, …)`, so `AndroidViewModelFactory` can build them,
+ * and because `app/build.gradle.kts` already puts `ui-test-manifest`'s `ComponentActivity` in the
+ * merged manifest the unit tests build against -- which that file says in terms.
+ *
+ * **Tags on the two bars.** They are in `TestTags`, applied inside `main`, for the reason that
+ * file's KDoc gives: a tag the test hands down proves only that the test set it.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class AdaptiveShellTest {
+
+    @get:Rule
+    val composeRule = createAndroidComposeRule<ComponentActivity>()
+
+    @Before
+    fun setUp() {
+        val app = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+        installTestWorkManager(app, Data.EMPTY)
+        // The real screens are composed here, so their ViewModels are real too. Neither test is
+        // about probing or publishing; left alone they would reach the FFprobe loader and this
+        // machine's codec list, and decide things no assertion mentions.
+        ConversionDependencies.probe = { _, _ -> InputProbe() }
+    }
+
+    @After
+    fun tearDown() {
+        ConversionDependencies.reset()
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `a phone gets the bottom bar and a tablet gets the rail`() {
+        setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Compact)
+
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR).assertExists()
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL).assertDoesNotExist()
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `an expanded window gets the rail`() {
+        setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Expanded)
+
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL).assertExists()
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR).assertDoesNotExist()
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The width class no test had ever passed.
+     *
+     * `useRail` is `!= Compact`, so Medium takes the rail with Expanded. Narrowing it to
+     * `== Expanded` is a one-character change that breaks every tablet and unfolded foldable and
+     * nothing else -- and until this test, nothing in either source set used `Medium` at all.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `a medium window is a rail window, not a phone`() {
+        setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Medium)
+
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL).assertExists()
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR).assertDoesNotExist()
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The mapping every other test stubs out: which screen each destination actually opens.
+     *
+     * Matched on each screen's own "choose a file" affordance rather than on a title, because those
+     * tags are applied by the screens themselves -- so this fails if the destinations are
+     * transposed, and it fails for the right reason.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `Convert opens the converter and Join opens the join screen`() {
+        setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Compact)
+
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Converter.CHOOSE_FILE).assertExists()
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Join.CHOOSE_FILES).assertDoesNotExist()
+
+        composeRule.onNodeWithText(Destination.JOIN.label).performClick()
+
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Join.CHOOSE_FILES).assertExists()
+        composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Converter.CHOOSE_FILE).assertDoesNotExist()
+    }
+
+    /** [AppRoot] with its real content, which is the half nothing else composes. */
+    private fun setShell(width: WindowWidthSizeClass) {
+        composeRule.setContent { AppRoot(width) }
+    }
+}

app/src/test/java/org/libremediaconverter/ffmpeg/FFmpegCommandBuilderTest.kt

@@ -166,6 +166,30 @@ class FFmpegCommandBuilderTest {
         assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.OPUS), "-c:a", "libopus")
     }
 
+    /**
+     * The arm most conversions actually take, and the only one in `audioArgs` with no test.
+     *
+     * `flac wav and opus select the right encoders` above covers the three named arms; MP3 has its
+     * own. AAC arrives through the `else`, so nothing named it and nothing pinned either half of
+     * what it emits -- neither `aac` nor `192k` appeared anywhere in this file. Both are shipped
+     * defaults: MP4 and M4A are the formats the picker offers first, so this is the audio
+     * every ordinary conversion gets.
+     *
+     * The bitrate is asserted as well as the encoder because it is the half a refactor is likelier
+     * to lose. An `-b:a` that quietly changed would not fail anything, would not look wrong in a
+     * command line, and would show up only as files that sound different from the ones the app
+     * produced last month.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `aac is the default encoder, at the bitrate the app ships`() {
+        assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.MP4_H264), "-c:a", "aac")
+        assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.MP4_H264), "-b:a", "192k")
+        // Through the `else` rather than through a named arm, so an AAC branch added above it later
+        // has to keep answering the same way.
+        assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.M4A_AAC), "-c:a", "aac")
+        assertPair(cmd(OutputFormat.M4A_AAC), "-b:a", "192k")
+    }
+
     @Test
     fun `audio only formats never carry a video encoder`() {
         listOf(OutputFormat.MP3, OutputFormat.FLAC, OutputFormat.WAV, OutputFormat.OPUS)

app/src/test/java/org/libremediaconverter/ui/TagTableUniquenessTest.kt

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ class TagTableUniquenessTest {
     fun `every tag constant has its own value`() {
         val tags = tagsIn(
             TestTags::class.java,
+            TestTags.Shell::class.java,
             TestTags.Converter::class.java,
             TestTags.Join::class.java,
         )

app/src/test/java/org/libremediaconverter/work/NotificationProgressTextTest.kt

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+package org.libremediaconverter.work
+
+import android.app.Notification
+import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
+import androidx.work.Data
+import org.junit.Assert.assertEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertNotEquals
+import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
+import org.junit.Before
+import org.junit.Test
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith
+import org.libremediaconverter.convert.installTestWorkManager
+import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
+import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
+import java.util.UUID
+
+/**
+ * The two things a progress notification can say, and that they are not the same thing.
+ *
+ * An assertion gap rather than a coverage one, and the distinction is the reason this file exists.
+ * JaCoCo is green on `build`'s `if (indeterminate)`, because `ProgressNotificationTest` drives it
+ * through a real worker -- but that test reads only the notification id and
+ * `Notification.EXTRA_PROGRESS`. **Nothing had ever read the text.** Swapping the two branches, or
+ * collapsing them into one string, passed the entire suite.
+ *
+ * What it costs to get wrong is small and constant: a conversion that has been running for four
+ * minutes still saying "Preparing", or one that has not started reporting yet claiming 0%. Neither
+ * is a crash, and neither would be found by anything else here -- which is exactly the kind of
+ * thing that survives for a long time.
+ *
+ * Nothing else in the suite constructs [ConversionNotifications] directly.
+ */
+@UnstableApi
+@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
+class NotificationProgressTextTest {
+
+    /**
+     * `build` reaches `WorkManager.getInstance` for the Cancel action's PendingIntent, so the
+     * notification cannot be built at all without one. That coupling is why nothing had ever
+     * constructed this class directly and read what it produced.
+     */
+    @Before
+    fun setUp() {
+        installTestWorkManager(RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication(), Data.EMPTY)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `an indeterminate notification says something different from a measured one`() {
+        val context = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+        val notifications = ConversionNotifications(context)
+
+        val preparing = notifications.build(JOB_ID, TITLE, percent = 0, indeterminate = true).text()
+        val measured = notifications.build(JOB_ID, TITLE, percent = 42, indeterminate = false).text()
+
+        assertNotEquals(
+            "the two states have to read differently, or the text says nothing at all",
+            preparing,
+            measured,
+        )
+        assertTrue(
+            "a measured notification has to carry its percentage, got \"$measured\"",
+            measured.contains("42"),
+        )
+        assertTrue(
+            "an indeterminate one must not invent one, got \"$preparing\"",
+            !preparing.contains("42") && !preparing.contains("0"),
+        )
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * The title is the caller's, not the builder's -- it is the file the user picked, and it is what
+     * tells two simultaneous conversions apart in the shade.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `the notification is titled with the file it is converting`() {
+        val context = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
+
+        val built = ConversionNotifications(context).build(JOB_ID, TITLE, percent = 10)
+
+        assertEquals(TITLE, built.extras.getString(Notification.EXTRA_TITLE))
+    }
+
+    private fun Notification.text(): String = extras.getString(Notification.EXTRA_TEXT).orEmpty()
+
+    private companion object {
+        const val TITLE = "holiday.mp4"
+        val JOB_ID: UUID = UUID.fromString("00000000-0000-4000-8000-00000000000a")
+    }
+}