#142 -- openOutputStream refuses two ways and only one was reachable. A
provider that has gone away throws from inside the call, which
`a destination the provider will not open...` already drives. A provider
that is present and declines returns null, and nothing could produce that
on demand. openDestination is the seam; the test asserts the failure names
the destination, which is what separates the `?: error(...)` from an NPE
inside `use`.
#143 -- the sweep's re-read. **The seam the ticket proposed does not reach
it.** Overriding the listing fires before the entries are snapshotted, so
StagingSweep.collectable is handed the new timestamp, the file is never
proposed for deletion, and the guard is never exercised. Measured: with an
entriesIn seam, deleting the guard outright left the test green.
The race is a file that *was* collectable when the snapshot was taken and
is not by the time the delete comes round, so the seam has to sit at the
snapshot. `snapshot(listing)` does, and deleting the guard now reddens the
test.
Three mutations after the move, three red:
null stream returns silently null-return test
null stream via !! instead null-return test
sweep deletes unconditionally race test
OutputPublisher.kt now has no never-executed lines at all. Two partial
branches are left and both are named exemptions rather than gaps:
L216's `getOrNull() ?: false` and L304's `getOrDefault(absoluteFile)` are
the failure arms of a runCatching whose body cannot be made to throw
through any public entry point -- the same shape as the `size >= 0`
exemption recorded in the previous commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
WorkerEnumFallbackTest already existed for this defect class -- a name
this build does not define, read above the try, throwing out of doWork
entirely: FAILED with reschedule=false, empty output Data so the screen
said "Conversion failed." with nothing else, and the staged file never
deleted. It covered 2 of the 5 above-the-try reads. readSpec's three
were the ones left, and all three were cold.
The baseline is the part worth reviewing. readSpec returns the *entire*
fallback spec the moment any one axis fails to resolve, so a test
starting from MP4_H265 -- which is itself the fallback -- cannot tell a
worker that read the spec correctly from one that gave up on it. These
start from MKV/H.264, which differs on container and video codec at
once, and assert the spec that actually reached the transcoder rather
than only that a Result came back.
Mutations run, four for three tests:
KEY_CONTAINER `?: return fallback` -> `?: error(...)` -> container test red
KEY_VIDEO_CODEC same -> video test red
KEY_AUDIO_CODEC same -> audio test red
fallback = MP4_H264 instead of MP4_H265 -> all three red
The first three confirm the tests are isolated to their own axis; the
fourth confirms they pin *which* spec ran, which is what "a Result at
all" would have missed.
readSpec is now fully covered, branches included.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>