Offer the file again after a failed save, rather than only offering to delete it #116

Merged
JMR-dev merged 2 commits from fix/failed-save-retry into main 2026-08-26 02:44:06 +00:00
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
JMR-dev 83b557409e Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into merge-116-tmp 2026-08-25 21:36:57 -05:00
JMR-devandClaude Opus 5 c887af0d83 Offer the file again after a failed save, rather than only offering to delete it
save()'s onFailure keeps the staged file on purpose -- it can be the only copy
of an hour of transcoding, and the destination did not receive it -- and then
handed the screen a Failed carrying a message and nothing else. That branch
rendered exactly one control: "Start over", wired to reset(), which discards
precisely the file the comment above it goes out of its way to keep. The intent
was already written down in main; the UI did not honour it, and the only rescue
was process death followed by reattach -- unadvertised, and bounded by a sweep
that collects anything a day old.

Failed now carries a PendingSave, and only where the failure came from save().
A transcode that died staged nothing and must not sprout a save button, so the
handle is nullable and the observe() arm leaves it null; so does a save that
found the file already gone. The branch renders "Try saving again" above "Start
over", opening the same CreateDocument flow with the same name and type the
first attempt used. A retry that fails again lands back on a carrying Failed
rather than a bare one, so the second failure cannot eat what the first kept.

Start over still deletes from there, and that is a decision rather than an
inheritance: deletion is the user's choice only once the alternative has been
offered. pendingStaged remains the single owner of the delete, so the carried
handle is a view of it rather than a second owner and no path out of the state
can drop a file the old shape could not.

pendingSave() exists so save() and each screen's CreateDocument registration
answer "what would a save target" once instead of twice -- the entry points
cast to Converted/Joined, which answered null for a Failed and fell back to the
current pickers, wrong for any spec edited since the job ran and for every
reattached job.

Both tabs, since JoinViewModel and JoinScreen have the same shape.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-25 21:16:02 -05:00