Merge pull request #186 from JMR-dev/test/adaptive-shell-wiring

B1 (#173): tell the rail from the bottom bar, and the Convert tab from the Join tab
This commit was merged in pull request #186.
This commit is contained in:
Jason Ross
2026-09-01 23:13:01 -05:00
committed by GitHub
4 changed files with 148 additions and 2 deletions
@@ -24,9 +24,11 @@ import androidx.compose.runtime.saveable.Saver
import androidx.compose.runtime.saveable.rememberSaveable
import androidx.compose.runtime.setValue
import androidx.compose.ui.Modifier
import androidx.compose.ui.platform.testTag
import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConverterScreen
import org.libremediaconverter.join.JoinScreen
import org.libremediaconverter.ui.TestTags
import org.libremediaconverter.ui.theme.LibreMediaConverterTheme
/**
@@ -114,7 +116,7 @@ internal fun AppRoot(
if (useRail) {
Row(modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize()) {
NavigationRail {
NavigationRail(modifier = Modifier.testTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL)) {
Destination.entries.forEach { item ->
NavigationRailItem(
selected = destination == item,
@@ -132,7 +134,7 @@ internal fun AppRoot(
Scaffold(
modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize(),
bottomBar = {
NavigationBar {
NavigationBar(modifier = Modifier.testTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR)) {
Destination.entries.forEach { item ->
NavigationBarItem(
selected = destination == item,
@@ -56,6 +56,20 @@ object TestTags {
*/
const val RETRY_SAVE: String = "action.retrySave"
/**
* The adaptive shell around both screens -- `AppRoot`'s two layouts.
*
* Named because there is no other way to tell them apart from a test. Both render the same two
* destinations with the same labels and the same selection state, so every assertion that could
* be written without these tags is satisfied by either layout, and transposing the two bodies
* passed the whole suite. Exactly one of the two exists at a time, which is what makes
* `assertExists` / `assertDoesNotExist` on this pair a statement about the width class.
*/
object Shell {
const val NAVIGATION_RAIL: String = "shell.navigationRail"
const val NAVIGATION_BAR: String = "shell.navigationBar"
}
/** `ConverterScreen`. */
object Converter {
const val CHOOSE_FILE: String = "converter.chooseFile"
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
package org.libremediaconverter
import androidx.activity.ComponentActivity
import androidx.compose.material3.windowsizeclass.WindowWidthSizeClass
import androidx.compose.ui.test.junit4.v2.createAndroidComposeRule
import androidx.compose.ui.test.onNodeWithTag
import androidx.compose.ui.test.onNodeWithText
import androidx.compose.ui.test.performClick
import androidx.media3.common.util.UnstableApi
import androidx.work.Data
import org.junit.After
import org.junit.Before
import org.junit.Rule
import org.junit.Test
import org.junit.runner.RunWith
import org.libremediaconverter.convert.ConversionDependencies
import org.libremediaconverter.convert.installTestWorkManager
import org.libremediaconverter.model.InputProbe
import org.libremediaconverter.ui.TestTags
import org.robolectric.RobolectricTestRunner
import org.robolectric.RuntimeEnvironment
/**
* Which navigation affordance the shell actually renders, and which screen it actually shows.
*
* Assertion gaps rather than coverage gaps, both of them, and that is why they lasted.
* `AppRootRestorationTest` already drives `AppRoot` at `Compact` and `Expanded`, so JaCoCo is green
* on `useRail` -- but it asserts only that the *selected tab* survives recreation, through a stub
* `content` composable. Nothing anywhere queried for a rail or a bar, and nothing rendered the real
* screens. Two consequences, both measured before this file existed:
*
* - **Transposing the `NavigationRail` and `NavigationBar` bodies passed the entire suite.**
* - **Transposing `Content`'s two arms passed it too** -- a tablet showing the phone chrome, or the
* Convert tab opening the Join screen, and 546 tests with nothing to say about either.
*
* `AppRoot`'s own KDoc is why this matters more than it looks: from targetSdk 37 the app is resized
* and rotated whether or not it is ready, so the width class is not a preference, it is whatever
* the system hands over.
*
* ## Two things this needed that the rest of the suite does not
*
* **`createAndroidComposeRule`, not `createComposeRule`.** Rendering `AppRoot` with its *default*
* content reaches `ConverterScreen`'s `viewModel = viewModel()`, which needs a
* `ViewModelStoreOwner`; the plain rule supplies none. It works because both ViewModels are
* `@JvmOverloads constructor(app: Application, …)`, so `AndroidViewModelFactory` can build them,
* and because `app/build.gradle.kts` already puts `ui-test-manifest`'s `ComponentActivity` in the
* merged manifest the unit tests build against -- which that file says in terms.
*
* **Tags on the two bars.** They are in `TestTags`, applied inside `main`, for the reason that
* file's KDoc gives: a tag the test hands down proves only that the test set it.
*/
@UnstableApi
@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner::class)
class AdaptiveShellTest {
@get:Rule
val composeRule = createAndroidComposeRule<ComponentActivity>()
@Before
fun setUp() {
val app = RuntimeEnvironment.getApplication()
installTestWorkManager(app, Data.EMPTY)
// The real screens are composed here, so their ViewModels are real too. Neither test is
// about probing or publishing; left alone they would reach the FFprobe loader and this
// machine's codec list, and decide things no assertion mentions.
ConversionDependencies.probe = { _, _ -> InputProbe() }
}
@After
fun tearDown() {
ConversionDependencies.reset()
}
@Test
fun `a phone gets the bottom bar and a tablet gets the rail`() {
setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Compact)
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR).assertExists()
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL).assertDoesNotExist()
}
@Test
fun `an expanded window gets the rail`() {
setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Expanded)
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL).assertExists()
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR).assertDoesNotExist()
}
/**
* The width class no test had ever passed.
*
* `useRail` is `!= Compact`, so Medium takes the rail with Expanded. Narrowing it to
* `== Expanded` is a one-character change that breaks every tablet and unfolded foldable and
* nothing else -- and until this test, nothing in either source set used `Medium` at all.
*/
@Test
fun `a medium window is a rail window, not a phone`() {
setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Medium)
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_RAIL).assertExists()
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Shell.NAVIGATION_BAR).assertDoesNotExist()
}
/**
* The mapping every other test stubs out: which screen each destination actually opens.
*
* Matched on each screen's own "choose a file" affordance rather than on a title, because those
* tags are applied by the screens themselves -- so this fails if the destinations are
* transposed, and it fails for the right reason.
*/
@Test
fun `Convert opens the converter and Join opens the join screen`() {
setShell(WindowWidthSizeClass.Compact)
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Converter.CHOOSE_FILE).assertExists()
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Join.CHOOSE_FILES).assertDoesNotExist()
composeRule.onNodeWithText(Destination.JOIN.label).performClick()
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Join.CHOOSE_FILES).assertExists()
composeRule.onNodeWithTag(TestTags.Converter.CHOOSE_FILE).assertDoesNotExist()
}
/** [AppRoot] with its real content, which is the half nothing else composes. */
private fun setShell(width: WindowWidthSizeClass) {
composeRule.setContent { AppRoot(width) }
}
}
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ class TagTableUniquenessTest {
fun `every tag constant has its own value`() {
val tags = tagsIn(
TestTags::class.java,
TestTags.Shell::class.java,
TestTags.Converter::class.java,
TestTags.Join::class.java,
)