Re-measure coverage, because the figure here was quoted from before the test push

CLAUDE.md's own rule is "re-measure before quoting", and the figure it carried
was measured on 2026-08-24 -- before the #52 children, the MediaProbe and codec
tests, and the guards from #100/#107 landed. Quoting it now would understate the
suite by twelve points, which is the same failure the bullet directly below it
was written to describe.

Measured on b53f326 with ./gradlew :app:jacocoTestReport:

  LINE    1847/2268   81.4%   (was 1519/2194, 69.2%)
  BRANCH   837/1390   60.2%   (was 53.2%)

against 417 JVM tests in 60 classes, all green.

The denominator moved too, 2194 -> 2268: the same push added production code of
its own, so this is not a pure numerator gain and the note now says so. The
Robolectric/isIncludeNoLocationClasses history is left exactly as it was -- it
explains why every pre-2026-08-24 figure was an artifact, and that is still the
most useful thing in the entry. "That date" is now spelled out, since the
headline date above it has moved and the phrase no longer points at itself.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

CLAUDE.md

@@ -123,10 +123,10 @@ install for code that can never run — and on API 37 the full APK does not fit
 - The `model` package is excluded from `ReturnCount` and `CyclomaticComplexMethod` only. It is the
   decision layer, where one branch is one documented user-visible outcome and the metric counts
   answers rather than complexity. Every other rule still applies there.
-- **Coverage is reported, not gated** — **69.2% of lines (1519/2194), 53.2% of branches**,
-  measured 2026-08-24 with `./gradlew :app:jacocoTestReport`.
+- **Coverage is reported, not gated** — **81.4% of lines (1847/2268), 60.2% of branches**,
+  measured 2026-08-25 with `./gradlew :app:jacocoTestReport`, against 417 JVM tests in 60 classes.
 
-  **Every figure this file carried before that date was an artifact, roughly half the real one.**
+  **Every figure this file carried before 2026-08-24 was an artifact, roughly half the real one.**
   Robolectric loads classes through its own sandbox classloader with no source location, JaCoCo
   skips no-location classes by default, and nothing told it otherwise — so **not one Robolectric
   test counted**, and Robolectric is what exercises the framework edge here. The
@@ -140,9 +140,11 @@ install for code that can never run — and on API 37 the full APK does not fit
   disproportionately Robolectric, so each one added denominator and no numerator — the measurement
   was punishing exactly the tests that were hardest to write.
 
-  Two things still hold. A floor needs a baseline that has settled, and this one has now moved by
-  39 points in a single build change, so it has not. And **re-measure before quoting** — that
-  instruction is the only reason this was caught.
+  Two things still hold. A floor needs a baseline that has settled, and this one has not: it moved
+  39 points in a single build change on 2026-08-24, then another 12 as the #52 test push landed —
+  69.2% -> 81.4% line, 53.2% -> 60.2% branch — while the denominator grew 2194 -> 2268, because the
+  same push added production code of its own. And **re-measure before quoting** — that instruction
+  is the only reason either move was caught.
 - **Testable code is not done until it is tested.** If a piece is unit testable, it gets unit
   tests before it counts as done. If it is e2e testable, it gets e2e tests. Both clauses apply —
   a change that is both needs both.