Files
LibreMediaConverter/.github
JMR-devandClaude Opus 5 acc71bcaee Verify the SystemUI disable instead of trusting what pm reported
Four dispatches of one configuration -- API 37.0, swiftshader_indirect,
SystemUI disabled -- came back three green and one not, and the odd one out
was not a different failure so much as the same run without the fix applied.
In 32646029143 `pm disable-user` reported `new state: disabled-user` and
SystemUI then started eight more times:

  14:41:24 ActivityManager: Start proc 6412:com.android.systemui ... GradientColorWallpaper
  14:45:05 ActivityManager: Start proc 17299:com.android.systemui ... GradientColorWallpaper

with ten more RegionSampling aborts and a surfaceflinger pid that never sat
still (489, 1570, 3524, 4396, 6038, 7987, 9732, 11520, 13208, 15048). The
framework is being SIGKILLed every twenty seconds while this runs, so a
package-state change can go down with the system_server that accepted it.

Two things were wrong, and the second is why the first went unnoticed:

  - one disable attempt was treated as sufficient
  - the wait after `adb shell stop` was not a wait. It asked `service check`
    0.3 s later and got `found` from the system_server that was still on its
    way out, so it never waited for anything. Both the good and the bad run
    printed `services back after 5 s`, which is how a broken fix looked
    identical to a working one.

Now: up to three rounds of disable -> take the framework down and confirm
system_server is actually gone -> bring it back -> verify the package is in
`pm list packages -d` -> require a 45 s window with zero new aborts. Nothing
is believed because a command said so.

Also adds measure_baseline, default true. The 45 s pre-measurement is what
makes the rate comparable with the local figures, but it is 45 s of
crash-looping before the disable has to land, which is a worse starting
point than a real leg would have.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-23 09:48:53 -05:00
..