Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into m-127-tmp
This commit is contained in:
@@ -178,7 +178,12 @@ object ContainerCapabilities {
|
||||
if (!probe.hasVideo) {
|
||||
return Validation.Invalid(
|
||||
"This file has no video track to copy.",
|
||||
listOf(spec.copy(videoCodec = VideoCodec.NONE)),
|
||||
// Dropping the video is the right shape of answer, but it is only half of one:
|
||||
// `spec.copy(videoCodec = NONE)` is valid exactly when the audio axis already
|
||||
// happened to be fine, and refused otherwise — a Vorbis or PCM source into MP4,
|
||||
// an MP3 into WebM. Handing it to the shared path repairs both axes and drops
|
||||
// anything that still fails, so the chip cannot lead to a second error.
|
||||
suggestions(spec.copy(videoCodec = VideoCodec.NONE), probe, exclude = spec),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
val source = CodecNames.videoFromName(probe.videoCodec)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ import org.junit.Test
|
||||
* `OutputFormat` used to be twelve hand-picked triples, and its KDoc defended that on the grounds
|
||||
* that a closed set was what made routing decidable. Opening it up moves that burden here, so this
|
||||
* is where decidability now has to be proven.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* That includes what a refusal offers instead. `Validation.Invalid` promises every suggestion is
|
||||
* itself valid and names this class as the proof, so a branch that assembles its own suggestion
|
||||
* list rather than going through `suggestions()` is only checked here if some row happens to reach
|
||||
* it — which is how a dead-end chip survived two widenings of that table.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
class ContainerCapabilitiesTest {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -35,6 +40,29 @@ class ContainerCapabilitiesTest {
|
||||
container = Container.MP3,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* An audio-only input carrying a codec MP4 has no place for at all.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Vorbis lives in Ogg and Matroska; MP4 carries AAC, MP3, Opus and FLAC. That gap is what turns
|
||||
* a suggestion which merely drops the video track into a second refusal.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private val vorbisSource = InputProbe(
|
||||
videoCodec = null,
|
||||
audioCodec = "vorbis",
|
||||
hasVideo = false,
|
||||
kind = InputKind.AUDIO_ONLY,
|
||||
container = Container.OGG,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
/** The same shape, for the other codec MP4 refuses. One case is a coincidence; two is the rule. */
|
||||
private val pcmSource = InputProbe(
|
||||
videoCodec = null,
|
||||
audioCodec = "pcm_s16le",
|
||||
hasVideo = false,
|
||||
kind = InputKind.AUDIO_ONLY,
|
||||
container = Container.WAV,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// --- copy and encode are different questions ----------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -97,7 +125,17 @@ class ContainerCapabilitiesTest {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** A suggestion that is itself invalid is worse than no suggestion. */
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A suggestion that is itself invalid is worse than no suggestion.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Only a branch that assembles its own suggestion list can break that promise: [suggestions]
|
||||
* ends by filtering on `validate(...).isValid`, so everything routed through it is valid by
|
||||
* construction. Those branches are what this table has to cover — the image output, and copy
|
||||
* the video from a file that has none, which built its list by hand and came back refused for
|
||||
* a Vorbis or PCM source into MP4 and an MP3 into WebM. The Advanced picker showed a one-tap
|
||||
* fix that led straight to a second error, through two widenings of this table that never
|
||||
* reached the branch.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
fun `every suggestion is itself valid`() {
|
||||
val cases = listOf(
|
||||
@@ -109,15 +147,31 @@ class ContainerCapabilitiesTest {
|
||||
OutputSpec(Container.MP4, VideoCodec.COPY, AudioCodec.NONE) to mp3Source,
|
||||
OutputSpec(Container.MP4, VideoCodec.NONE, AudioCodec.NONE) to mp3Source,
|
||||
OutputSpec(Container.MP4, VideoCodec.COPY, AudioCodec.AAC) to mp3Source,
|
||||
// Copy-the-video-from-a-file-with-no-video, the last branch that built its offer by
|
||||
// hand. It escaped the five rows above because `spec.copy(videoCodec = NONE)` is valid
|
||||
// exactly when the audio axis happens to be fine — true for the AAC and MP3 sources
|
||||
// used there, false for any audio the target container cannot carry.
|
||||
OutputSpec(Container.MP4, VideoCodec.COPY, AudioCodec.COPY) to vorbisSource,
|
||||
OutputSpec(Container.MP4, VideoCodec.COPY, AudioCodec.COPY) to pcmSource,
|
||||
OutputSpec(Container.WEBM, VideoCodec.COPY, AudioCodec.COPY) to mp3Source,
|
||||
// The same branch with audio the container *can* hold, which is the half that already
|
||||
// worked and must keep working: the repair here is a copy, so the offer is the very
|
||||
// spec the caller handed to `suggestions`. It survives only because the exclusion is
|
||||
// against what the user asked for rather than against the repair.
|
||||
OutputSpec(Container.MP4, VideoCodec.COPY, AudioCodec.COPY) to mp3Source,
|
||||
// The one branch that still builds its list by hand, so that it is asserted rather
|
||||
// than merely reasoned about: an image container takes `None + None` and nothing else,
|
||||
// which makes its single offer valid by construction.
|
||||
OutputSpec(Container.GIF, VideoCodec.H264, AudioCodec.AAC) to h264Source,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
cases.forEach { (spec, probe) ->
|
||||
val invalid = ContainerCapabilities.validate(spec, probe) as? Validation.Invalid
|
||||
?: throw AssertionError("expected $spec to be rejected")
|
||||
assertTrue("no alternatives offered for $spec", invalid.suggestions.isNotEmpty())
|
||||
assertTrue("no alternatives offered for $spec on $probe", invalid.suggestions.isNotEmpty())
|
||||
invalid.suggestions.forEach { suggestion ->
|
||||
assertTrue(
|
||||
"suggested $suggestion for $spec is itself invalid",
|
||||
"suggested $suggestion for $spec on $probe is itself invalid",
|
||||
ContainerCapabilities.validate(suggestion, probe).isValid,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user