C2 (#136): test the audio half of validate, and the one video refusal missing

The two halves of ContainerCapabilities.validate were written together and only one of them was ever checked. Six audio outcomes had no test -- every one a string the user reads -- while the video twin of each was already covered. Seven tests, deliberately shaped like their twins rather than as a fresh idea about what to assert: unidentifiable source audio on a COPY twin of `an unidentifiable source codec cannot be copied` container cannot hold the copied source twin of `a codec the container cannot hold is refused...` container cannot carry it on encode twin of `H265 in AVI is refused` this app cannot encode it twin of `copying is offered as the fix when...` accepts(_, AudioCodec.NONE, _) -> true twin of the VideoCodec.NONE arm accepts(_, AudioCodec.COPY, _) throws twin of `resolving COPY before asking the matrix is required` The seventh is not the audio axis: validateVideo's copy-into-a-container- that-cannot-hold-it refusal was the one video outcome with no test, and it is the same shape and the same file. Each asserts the message verbatim and re-validates every suggestion the refusal offers. Validation.Invalid promises its suggestions are themselves valid and names this class as the proof; the existing property test walks the presets, and no preset reaches suggestions() through validateAudio. Seven mutations run, seven red, each isolated to exactly one test: CARRIES_AUDIO check -> false encode-path test only drop the COPY error arm resolve-first test only AudioCodec.NONE -> false no-audio-track test only drop ENCODABLE_AUDIO check unencodable test only drop audio copy container check audio-copy test only drop video copy container check video-copy test only drop unidentified-audio guard unidentifiable test only Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-26 22:27:27 -05:00
parent 099b7fd7c4
commit 04850a0415
1 changed files with 116 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -358,4 +358,120 @@ class ContainerCapabilitiesTest {
                assertEquals(emptyList<VideoCodec>(), ContainerCapabilities.encodableVideo(container))
            }
    }
+
+    // --- the audio axis -----------------------------------------------------
+    //
+    // Every rule below has a video twin already tested above. The two halves of `validate` were
+    // written together and only one of them was ever checked, so these are deliberately shaped like
+    // their twins rather than as a fresh idea about what to assert.
+
+    @Test
+    fun `an unidentifiable source audio codec cannot be copied`() {
+        // The audio twin of `an unidentifiable source codec cannot be copied`. Never guess: a copy
+        // of an unidentified codec is how you ship a file that does not play.
+        val unknownAudio = InputProbe(videoCodec = "h264", audioCodec = null, container = Container.MP4)
+        val spec = OutputSpec(Container.MP4, VideoCodec.H264, AudioCodec.COPY)
+
+        val invalid = ContainerCapabilities.validate(spec, unknownAudio) as? Validation.Invalid
+            ?: throw AssertionError("copying an unidentified audio codec must be refused")
+
+        assertTrue(invalid.message, invalid.message.contains("could not be identified"))
+        assertEverySuggestionValid(invalid, unknownAudio)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `copying an audio codec the container cannot hold is refused`() {
+        // MP4 carries AAC, MP3, Opus and FLAC. Vorbis lives in Ogg and Matroska, so a stream copy
+        // out of a Vorbis source into MP4 has nowhere to put the track.
+        val vorbisAudio = InputProbe(videoCodec = "h264", audioCodec = "vorbis", container = Container.MKV)
+        val spec = OutputSpec(Container.MP4, VideoCodec.H264, AudioCodec.COPY)
+
+        val invalid = ContainerCapabilities.validate(spec, vorbisAudio) as? Validation.Invalid
+            ?: throw AssertionError("Vorbis copied into MP4 must be refused")
+
+        assertEquals("MP4 cannot hold Vorbis audio.", invalid.message)
+        assertEverySuggestionValid(invalid, vorbisAudio)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `an audio codec the container cannot hold is refused on the encode path too`() {
+        // WAV carries PCM and nothing else. The twin is `H265 in AVI is refused`.
+        val spec = OutputSpec(Container.WAV, VideoCodec.NONE, AudioCodec.AAC)
+
+        val invalid = ContainerCapabilities.validate(spec, mp3Source) as? Validation.Invalid
+            ?: throw AssertionError("AAC in WAV must be refused")
+
+        assertEquals("WAV cannot hold AAC audio.", invalid.message)
+        assertEverySuggestionValid(invalid, mp3Source)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `an audio codec this app cannot encode is refused, and copying is offered instead`() {
+        // Matroska carries Vorbis; nothing here encodes it. The refusal has to say so *and* say
+        // what would work, which is the audio twin of `copying is offered as the fix when the codec
+        // is right but unencodable`.
+        val spec = OutputSpec(Container.MKV, VideoCodec.H264, AudioCodec.VORBIS)
+
+        val invalid = ContainerCapabilities.validate(spec, h264Source) as? Validation.Invalid
+            ?: throw AssertionError("encoding Vorbis must be refused")
+
+        assertEquals(
+            "This app cannot encode Vorbis audio. It can still be copied from a Vorbis source.",
+            invalid.message,
+        )
+        assertEverySuggestionValid(invalid, h264Source)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `copying a video codec the container cannot hold is refused`() {
+        // Not the audio axis, but the one video refusal with no test: AVI predates H.265, so a
+        // stream copy out of an HEVC source into AVI has nowhere to put the track. `H265 in AVI is
+        // refused` covers the matrix; this covers what validate() does with it.
+        val h265Source = InputProbe(videoCodec = "hevc", audioCodec = "mp3", container = Container.MP4)
+        val spec = OutputSpec(Container.AVI, VideoCodec.COPY, AudioCodec.MP3)
+
+        val invalid = ContainerCapabilities.validate(spec, h265Source) as? Validation.Invalid
+            ?: throw AssertionError("H.265 copied into AVI must be refused")
+
+        assertEquals("AVI cannot hold H.265 video.", invalid.message)
+        assertEverySuggestionValid(invalid, h265Source)
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `no audio track is accepted by every container in both modes`() {
+        // The audio twin of VideoCodec.NONE -> true. A container that refused "no audio" would make
+        // every video-only output invalid.
+        Container.entries.forEach { container ->
+            listOf(CodecMode.COPY, CodecMode.ENCODE).forEach { mode ->
+                assertTrue(
+                    "$container should accept no audio track ($mode)",
+                    ContainerCapabilities.accepts(container, AudioCodec.NONE, mode),
+                )
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    fun `resolving audio COPY before asking the matrix is required`() {
+        // The audio twin of `resolving COPY before asking the matrix is required`, and the reason is
+        // identical: silently answering "false" would refuse a perfectly good remux.
+        runCatching { ContainerCapabilities.accepts(Container.MP4, AudioCodec.COPY, CodecMode.COPY) }
+            .onSuccess { throw AssertionError("expected audio COPY to be rejected by the matrix") }
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Every alternative a refusal offers has to be one the same input could actually take.
+     *
+     * `Validation.Invalid` promises exactly this and names this class as the proof. The global
+     * property test walks the presets; these paths reach `suggestions()` through `validateAudio`,
+     * which no preset does.
+     */
+    private fun assertEverySuggestionValid(invalid: Validation.Invalid, probe: InputProbe) {
+        invalid.suggestions.forEach {
+            assertTrue(
+                "suggestion $it is itself invalid, so the chip leads to a second error",
+                ContainerCapabilities.validate(it, probe).isValid,
+            )
+        }
+    }
 }